Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH V4 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa"
2020 Aug 04
0
[PATCH V5 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
> and update irq offloading respectively by register/unregister
> and re-register the irq_bypass_producer.
>
> With these functions, this commit can setup/unsetup
> irq offloading through setting DRIVER_OK/!DRIVER_OK, and
> update irq offloading through SET_VRING_CALL.
>
2020 Aug 04
0
[PATCH V5 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 05:31:38PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
> On 8/4/2020 4:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>
> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
> and update irq offloading respectively by register/unregister
> and re-register the irq_bypass_producer.
>
>
2020 Aug 05
0
[PATCH V5 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/8/4 ??5:31, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 8/4/2020 4:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
>>> and update irq offloading respectively by register/unregister
>>> and re-register the irq_bypass_producer.
>>>
>>> With these
2020 Aug 05
0
[PATCH V5 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/8/5 ??1:45, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 8/5/2020 10:36 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/8/4 ??5:31, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/4/2020 4:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>>>> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
2020 Jul 17
0
[PATCH V2 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/16 ??7:23, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
> and update irq offloading respectively by register/unregister
> and re-register the irq_bypass_producer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu at intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 1 +
>
2020 Jul 13
0
[PATCH 3/7] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading functions in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/12 ??10:49, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
> and update irq offloading respectively by register/unregister
> and re-register the irq_bypass_producer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file
2020 Jul 15
0
[PATCH 3/7] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading functions in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/13 ??5:47, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 7/13/2020 4:22 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/7/12 ??10:49, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
>>> and update irq offloading respectively by register/unregister
>>> and re-register the irq_bypass_producer.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by:
2020 Aug 05
0
[PATCH 2/2] vhost_vdpa: unified set_vq_irq() and update_vq_irq()
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 07:38:32PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This commit merge vhost_vdpa_update_vq_irq() logics into
> vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), so that code are unified.
>
> In vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(), added checks for the existence
> for get_vq_irq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu at intel.com>
which commit should I squash this into?
commit
2020 Jul 15
0
[PATCH 3/7] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading functions in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/15 ??4:56, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>
>
> On 7/15/2020 4:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/7/13 ??5:47, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/13/2020 4:22 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2020/7/12 ??10:49, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>>>> This patch introduce a set of functions for setup/unsetup
2020 Sep 09
0
[PATCH] vhost_vdpa: remove unnecessary spin_lock in vhost_vring_call
On 2020/9/9 ??2:52, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This commit removed unnecessary spin_locks in vhost_vring_call
> and related operations. Because we manipulate irq offloading
> contents in vhost_vdpa ioctl code path which is already
> protected by dev mutex and vq mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu at intel.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at
2020 Jul 17
0
[PATCH V2 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
Hi Zhu,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on vhost/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on kvm/linux-next linus/master v5.8-rc5 next-20200716]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url:
2020 Feb 05
0
[PATCH] vhost: introduce vDPA based backend
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 11:30:11AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2020/1/31 ??11:36, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > This patch introduces a vDPA based vhost backend. This
> > backend is built on top of the same interface defined
> > in virtio-vDPA and provides a generic vhost interface
> > for userspace to accelerate the virtio devices in guest.
> >
> > This backend is
2020 Jul 29
0
[PATCH V4 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/28 ??5:04, Eli Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:24:03PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>
>> +static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, int qid)
>> +{
>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &v->vqs[qid];
>> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = v->vdpa->config;
>> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
>> +
2020 Aug 05
0
[PATCH V5 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> +static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid)
> +{
> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &v->vqs[qid];
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = v->vdpa->config;
> + struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> + int ret, irq;
> +
> + spin_lock(&vq->call_ctx.ctx_lock);
> + irq =
2020 Jul 29
0
[PATCH V4 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/29 ??5:55, Eli Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 05:21:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 2020/7/28 ??5:04, Eli Cohen wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:24:03PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>>>> +static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, int qid)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &v->vqs[qid];
2020 Jul 28
0
[PATCH V4 4/6] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/28 ??5:18, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>>>
>>> ?????? * status to 0.
>>> @@ -167,6 +220,15 @@ static long vhost_vdpa_set_status(struct
>>> vhost_vdpa *v, u8 __user *statusp)
>>> ????? if (status != 0 && (ops->get_status(vdpa) & ~status) != 0)
>>> ????????? return -EINVAL;
>>> ? +??? /* vq irq is not expected to be
2020 Feb 04
10
[PATCH] vhost: introduce vDPA based backend
On 2020/1/31 ??11:36, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> This patch introduces a vDPA based vhost backend. This
> backend is built on top of the same interface defined
> in virtio-vDPA and provides a generic vhost interface
> for userspace to accelerate the virtio devices in guest.
>
> This backend is implemented as a vDPA device driver on
> top of the same ops used in virtio-vDPA. It will
2020 Feb 04
10
[PATCH] vhost: introduce vDPA based backend
On 2020/1/31 ??11:36, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> This patch introduces a vDPA based vhost backend. This
> backend is built on top of the same interface defined
> in virtio-vDPA and provides a generic vhost interface
> for userspace to accelerate the virtio devices in guest.
>
> This backend is implemented as a vDPA device driver on
> top of the same ops used in virtio-vDPA. It will
2020 Jul 15
0
[PATCH 3/7] vhost_vdpa: implement IRQ offloading functions in vhost_vdpa
On 2020/7/15 ??5:20, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I meant something like:
>>>>
>>>> unregister();
>>>> vq->call_ctx.producer.token = ctx;
>>>> register();
>>> This is what we are doing now, or I must missed somethig:
>>> if (ctx && ctx != token) {
>>>
2020 Aug 04
0
[PATCH V5 1/6] vhost: introduce vhost_vring_call
On 2020/7/31 ??2:55, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
> This commit introduces struct vhost_vring_call which replaced
> raw struct eventfd_ctx *call_ctx in struct vhost_virtqueue.
> Besides eventfd_ctx, it contains a spin lock and an
> irq_bypass_producer in its structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu at intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at