similar to: [PATCH v2 0/4] Remove 32-bit Xen PV guest support

The long term plan has been to replace Xen PV guests by PVH. The first victim of that plan are now 32-bit PV guests, as those are used only rather seldom these days. Xen on x86 requires 64-bit support and with Grub2 now supporting PVH officially since version 2.04 there is no need to keep 32-bit PV guest support alive in the Linux kernel. Additionally Meltdown mitigation is not available in the

A lot of cleanup after removal of 32-bit Xen PV guest support in paravirt code. Changes in V4: - dropped patches 1-3, as already committed - addressed comments to V3 - added new patches 5+6 Changes in V3: - addressed comments to V2 - split patch 1 into 2 patches - new patches 3 and 7 Changes in V2: - rebase to 5.8 kernel - addressed comments to V1 - new patches 3 and 4 Juergen Gross (6):

The long term plan has been to replace Xen PV guests by PVH. The first victim of that plan are now 32-bit PV guests, as those are used only rather seldom these days. Xen on x86 requires 64-bit support and with Grub2 now supporting PVH officially since version 2.04 there is no need to keep 32-bit PV guest support alive in the Linux kernel. Additionally Meltdown mitigation is not available in the

The long term plan has been to replace Xen PV guests by PVH. The first victim of that plan are now 32-bit PV guests, as those are used only rather seldom these days. Xen on x86 requires 64-bit support and with Grub2 now supporting PVH officially since version 2.04 there is no need to keep 32-bit PV guest support alive in the Linux kernel. Additionally Meltdown mitigation is not available in the

This series removes some no longer needed stuff from paravirt infrastructure and puts large quantities of paravirt ops under a new config option PARAVIRT_XXL which is selected by XEN_PV only. A pvops kernel without XEN_PV being configured is about 2.5% smaller with this series applied. tip commit 5800dc5c19f34e6e03b5adab1282535cb102fafd ("x86/paravirt: Fix spectre-v2 mitigations for

Today paravirtualization is a all-or-nothing game: either a kernel is compiled with no paravirtualization support at all, or it is supporting paravirtualized environments like Xen pv-guests or lguest additionally to some paravirtualized tuning for KVM, Hyperv, VMWare or Xen HVM-guests. As support of pv-guests requires quite intrusive pv-hooks (e.g. all access functions to page table entries,

Today paravirtualization is a all-or-nothing game: either a kernel is compiled with no paravirtualization support at all, or it is supporting paravirtualized environments like Xen pv-guests or lguest additionally to some paravirtualized tuning for KVM, Hyperv, VMWare or Xen HVM-guests. As support of pv-guests requires quite intrusive pv-hooks (e.g. all access functions to page table entries,

The last 32-bit user of stuff under CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL is gone. Remove 32-bit specific parts. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> --- arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.c | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 92 +++------------------ arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 21 ----- arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level_types.h | 5 --

The last 32-bit user of stuff under CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL is gone. Remove 32-bit specific parts. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> --- arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.c | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 120 ++------------------ arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 21 ---- arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable-3level_types.h | 5 -

This series removes some no longer needed stuff from paravirt infrastructure and puts large quantities of paravirt ops under a new config option PARAVIRT_XXL which is selected by XEN_PV only. A pvops kernel without XEN_PV being configured is about 2.5% smaller with this series applied. tip commit 5800dc5c19f34e6e03b5adab1282535cb102fafd ("x86/paravirt: Fix spectre-v2 mitigations for

On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > @@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val) > { > pteval_t ret; > > - if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long)) > - ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val >> 32); > - else > - ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); > + ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); >

On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > @@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val) > { > pteval_t ret; > > - if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long)) > - ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val >> 32); > - else > - ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); > + ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val); >

On 8/10/20 12:39 AM, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > On 09.08.20 04:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> @@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val) >>> ? { >>> ????? pteval_t ret; >>> ? -??? if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long)) >>> -??????? ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val

This is a small series getting rid of paravirt patching by switching completely to alternative patching for the same functionality. The basic idea is to add the capability to switch from indirect to direct calls via a special alternative patching option. This removes _some_ of the paravirt macro maze, but most of it needs to stay due to the need of hiding the call instructions from the compiler

This is a small series getting rid of paravirt patching by switching completely to alternative patching for the same functionality. The basic idea is to add the capability to switch from indirect to direct calls via a special alternative patching option. This removes _some_ of the paravirt macro maze, but most of it needs to stay due to the need of hiding the call instructions from the compiler

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Hi all, [ Change since last post: change name to ptep_modify_prot_, on the grounds that it isn't really a general pte-modification interface. ] This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native),

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,

Hi all, This little series adds a new transaction-like abstraction for doing RMW updates to a pte, hooks it into paravirt_ops, and then makes use of it in Xen. The basic problem is that mprotect is very slow under Xen (up to 50x slower than native), primarily because of the ptent = ptep_get_and_clear(mm, addr, pte); ptent = pte_modify(ptent, newprot); /* ... */ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte,