similar to: [RFC 0/3] virtio: NUMA-aware memory allocation

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > > someone picks up this work again in the future. > > > > The goal of these patches is to

On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > > someone picks up this work again in the future. > > > > The goal of these patches is to

Defines XENMEM subop hypercall for PV vNUMA enabled guests and data structures that provide vNUMA topology information from per-domain vnuma topology build info. Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com> --- Changes since RFC v2: - fixed code style; - the memory copying in hypercall happens in one go for arrays; - fixed error codes logic; --- xen/common/domain.c | 10

Enables numa if vnuma topology hypercall is supported and it is domU. Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva <ufimtseva@gmail.com> --- arch/x86/xen/setup.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c index 68c054f..0aab799 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/setup.c @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include

We don’t preserve the NUMA properties of the VM across the migration. Just disable the migration for now. Also, setting disable_migrate doesn’t seem to stop one from actually migrating a VM. So, this patch is only for documentation. -dulloor Signed-off-by : Dulloor <dulloor@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Rusty, I have a mind to include this patchset for this merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, I have a mind to include this patchset for this merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, I have a mind to send this patches for the next merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, I have a mind to send this patches for the next merge window. Any input on this? This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a

Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a clear violation of virtio

Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device before setting ACKNOWLEDGE and DRIVER bits 2. on probe, drivers aren't prepared to handle config interrupts arriving before probe returns 3. on probe, drivers use device before DRIVER_OK it set Note that 1 is a clear violation of virtio

Hi, These patches add support for S4 to virtio (pci) and all drivers. For each driver, all vqs are removed before hibernation, and then re-created after restore. Some driver-specific uninit and init work is also done in the freeze and restore functions. All the drivers in testing work fine: * virtio-blk is used for the only disk in the VM, IO works fine before and after. 'dd

Hi, These patches add support for S4 to virtio (pci) and all drivers. For each driver, all vqs are removed before hibernation, and then re-created after restore. Some driver-specific uninit and init work is also done in the freeze and restore functions. All the drivers in testing work fine: * virtio-blk is used for the only disk in the VM, IO works fine before and after. 'dd

Hi, These patches add support for S4 to virtio (pci) and all drivers. Michael saw some race in virtio-net module removal which will need a similar fix for the freeze code as well. I'll update the virtio-net patch with that fix once the fix is settled upon and applied. For each driver, all vqs are removed before hibernation, and then re-created after restore. Some driver-specific uninit

Hi, These patches add support for S4 to virtio (pci) and all drivers. Michael saw some race in virtio-net module removal which will need a similar fix for the freeze code as well. I'll update the virtio-net patch with that fix once the fix is settled upon and applied. For each driver, all vqs are removed before hibernation, and then re-created after restore. Some driver-specific uninit

On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > someone picks up this work again in the future. > > The goal of these patches is to allocate virtqueues and driver state from the > device's NUMA node for optimal memory

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 10:26:46AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 02:34:37PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2020/6/25 ??9:57, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > These patches are not ready to be merged because I was unable to measure a > > > performance improvement. I'm publishing them so they are archived in case > > > someone

Changes from v4: rename virtio_enable_vqs_early() to virtio_device_ready() Note: Rusty requested we add a BUG_ON in the virtio_ring code. This can be done by a separate patch on top. Good for bisectability in case BUG_ON starts triggering :) Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device

Changes from v4: rename virtio_enable_vqs_early() to virtio_device_ready() Note: Rusty requested we add a BUG_ON in the virtio_ring code. This can be done by a separate patch on top. Good for bisectability in case BUG_ON starts triggering :) Rusty, please review this, and consider for this merge window. This fixes the following virtio spec compliance issues: 1. on restore, drivers use device

Hi, These patches add support for S4 to virtio (pci) and all drivers. For each driver, all vqs are removed before hibernation, and then re-created after restore. Some driver-specific uninit and init work is also done in the freeze and restore functions. All the drivers in testing work fine: * virtio-blk is used for the only disk in the VM, IO works fine before and after. * virtio-console: