similar to: [PATCH RFC] vhost: add an SOF Audio DSP driver

Hi Pierre, Thanks for the review! On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 11:50:48AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > > > > +config VHOST_SOF > > + tristate "Vhost SOF driver" > > + depends on SND_SOC_SOF > > you probably want to make sure VHOST_SOF and SND_SOC_SOF are both built-in > or module. Without constraints you are likely to trigger errors with

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]

This patch set is a follow up to "Add a vhost RPMsg API" [1], it is marked as an RFC because firstly it depends on the RPMsg API series and secondly it is currently being reviewed on ALSA and SOF mailing lists, but any early comments from virtualisation developers would be highly appreciated too! Thanks Guennadi [1]

Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and no support for VirtIO servers. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg server implementation, which makes it possible to use RPMsg over VirtIO between guest VMs and the host. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> ---

Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg server implementation. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> --- drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/vhost/Makefile | 3 +

Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg server implementation. Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at linux.intel.com> --- drivers/vhost/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/vhost/Makefile | 3 +

Hi Mathieu, On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:50:39PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 04:44:58PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a

Hi Mathieu, On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:39:46PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good afternoon, > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:46:36PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a

Hi Mathieu, On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:01:38PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 01:13:51PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > > no support for VirtIO servers. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > >

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 05:09:27PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Linux supports running the RPMsg protocol over the VirtIO transport > protocol, but currently there is only support for VirtIO clients and > no support for a VirtIO server. This patch adds a vhost-based RPMsg > server implementation. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski at

Hi Mathieu, On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:22:11AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good morning Guennadi, > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:38:54AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:39:46PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > Good afternoon, > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 07:46:36PM +0200,

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 11:33:13AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 09:46:56AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:22:11AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > > > Good morning Guennadi, > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:38:54AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >

we have implemented this function for 3.1p1, and have been using it in production sense may 2002. The patch has been ported to 3.7.1p2, we have been using it in 3.7.1p2 for awhile, if anyone is interested, here it is. This is the same patch David Bradford talked about on 2002-06-05 Regards, Greg Hayes diff -u -r openssh-3.7.1p2/sftp-client.c openssh-3.7.1p2_sftp/sftp-client.c ---

On 7/15/19 1:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > --- > .gitignore | 1 + > README | 2 + > configure.ac | 9 + > examples/Makefile.am | 22 ++ > examples/glib-main-loop.c | 501 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 535 insertions(+) > Rough review (since I've never used a glib main loop

--- .gitignore | 1 + README | 2 + configure.ac | 9 + examples/Makefile.am | 22 ++ examples/glib-main-loop.c | 501 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 535 insertions(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index edbf941..79b95b5 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ Makefile.in

--- .gitignore | 1 + README | 2 + configure.ac | 9 + examples/Makefile.am | 22 ++ examples/glib-main-loop.c | 511 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 545 insertions(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index ce02aef..9a8ba37 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ Makefile.in

There was a theoretic race in this example: If the server was very fast at handling commands then it's possible that in a call such as: cookie = nbd_aio_pread_callback (..., callback, ...); buffers[i].cookie = cookie; nbd_aio_pread_callback finished and calls the callback before returning. buffers[i].cookie would therefore not be set, but the callback() function was checking the list of

$ gcc -O2 -c -Woverlength-strings stupid.c stupid.c: In function ?insert_lf_record?: stupid.c:22: warning: string length ?7394? is greater than the length ?509? ISO C90 compilers are required to support Without -O2 the error message goes away. Even ISO C99 compilers don't help - they raise the limit to a mere 4095 bytes. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat

GCC has two warnings related to large stack frames. We were already using the -Wframe-larger-than warning, but this reduces the threshold from 10000 to 5000 bytes. However that warning only covers the static part of frames (not alloca). So this change also enables -Wstack-usage=10000 which covers both the static and dynamic usage (alloca and variable length arrays). Multiple changes are made