similar to: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu/virtio: Add topology description to virtio-iommu config space

> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker > Sent: Saturday, February 29, 2020 1:26 AM > > Platforms without device-tree do not currently have a method for > describing the vIOMMU topology. Provide a topology description embedded > into the virtio device. > > Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to > discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes

> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker > Sent: Saturday, February 29, 2020 1:26 AM > > Platforms without device-tree do not currently have a method for > describing the vIOMMU topology. Provide a topology description embedded > into the virtio device. > > Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to > discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes

> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker > Sent: Saturday, February 29, 2020 1:26 AM > > Platforms without device-tree do not currently have a method for > describing the vIOMMU topology. Provide a topology description embedded > into the virtio device. > > Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to > discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes

Some hypervisors don't implement either device-tree or ACPI, but still need a method to describe the IOMMU topology. Read the virtio-iommu config early and parse the topology description. Hook into the dma_setup() callbacks to initialize the IOMMU before probing endpoints. If the virtio-iommu uses the virtio-pci transport, this will only work if the PCI root complex is the first device

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:50:00AM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Some hypervisors don't implement either device-tree or ACPI, but still > need a method to describe the IOMMU topology. Read the virtio-iommu > config early and parse the topology description. Hook into the > dma_setup() callbacks to initialize the IOMMU before probing endpoints. > > If the virtio-iommu

Add topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 platforms. Since the RFC [1] I've mostly given up on ACPI tables, since the internal discussions seem to have reached a dead end. The built-in topology description presented here isn't ideal, but it is simple to implement and doesn't impose a dependency on ACPI or device-tree, which can be beneficial to lightweight

To support topology description from ACPI and from the builtin description, add helpers to keep track of I/O topology descriptors. To ease re-use of the helpers by other drivers and future ACPI extensions, use the "virt_" prefix rather than "virtio_" when naming structs and functions. Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe at linaro.org> ---

Hi Jean, On 8/21/20 3:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > To support topology description from ACPI and from the builtin > description, add helpers to keep track of I/O topology descriptors. > > To ease re-use of the helpers by other drivers and future ACPI > extensions, use the "virt_" prefix rather than "virtio_" when naming > structs and functions. >

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:25:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h > index 237e36a280cb..ec57d215086a 100644 > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_iommu.h > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_BYPASS 3 > #define VIRTIO_IOMMU_F_PROBE 4 >

Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 platforms. Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for booting (for example microvm), and will

Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 platforms. Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a minimal format. However some platforms don't use either ACPI or DT for booting (for example microvm), and will

I'm seeking feedback on multi-platform support for virtio-iommu. At the moment only devicetree (DT) is supported and we don't have a pleasant solution for other platforms. Once we figure out the topology description, x86 support is trivial. Since the IOMMU manages memory accesses from other devices, the guest kernel needs to initialize the IOMMU before endpoints start issuing DMA.

I'm seeking feedback on multi-platform support for virtio-iommu. At the moment only devicetree (DT) is supported and we don't have a pleasant solution for other platforms. Once we figure out the topology description, x86 support is trivial. Since the IOMMU manages memory accesses from other devices, the guest kernel needs to initialize the IOMMU before endpoints start issuing DMA.

Platforms without device-tree nor ACPI can provide a topology description embedded into the virtio config space. Parse it. Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes place, and the virtio driver may be loaded much later. Since we discover the topology description when probing the PCI hierarchy, the virtual IOMMU

Hi Jean, On 8/21/20 3:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Platforms without device-tree nor ACPI can provide a topology > description embedded into the virtio config space. Parse it. > > Use PCI FIXUP to probe the config space early, because we need to > discover the topology before any DMA configuration takes place, and the > virtio driver may be loaded much later. Since we

This patch finally gives us full proper -ENOSPC handling for btrfs. Now whenever you do a btrfs_start_transaction, you must specify the number of items you are planning to add/delete/modify. The worst case number of blocks that could be modified by changing that number of items will be calculated and checked against the amount of free space in the space_info where the root you are modifying

Hey all, Alright. So we decided to not go with Avaya for our next PBX and we are now full on into an Asterisk/Lync 2010 implementation. Asterisk/FreePBX is our SIP gateway and call center and Lync is our internal UC and IP-PBX server. I've already got Asterisk tied with our Nortel/Merridian Option 11 with QSig and all is beautiful (except for the Opt11 not receiving names from * but

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 03:15:34PM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > platforms. > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > minimal

Hi, On 8/21/20 3:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > platforms. > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a > new vendor-agnostic table describing para-virtual topologies in a > minimal format. However some

On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 06:24:12PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote: > Hi, > > On 8/21/20 3:15 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > Add a topology description to the virtio-iommu driver and enable x86 > > platforms. > > > > Since [v2] we have made some progress on adding ACPI support for > > virtio-iommu, which is the preferred boot method on x86. It will be a >