similar to: [PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ"

2019 Dec 23
0
[PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 09:40:11AM -0800, Alistair Delva wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 6:09 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by > > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending commands > > through CTRL_VQ. So it does not make sense to > > acknowledge
2020 Jan 06
0
[PATCH v2] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On 2020/1/5 ??9:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending commands > through CTRL_VQ. So it does not make sense to > acknowledge VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS without > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. > > The spec does not outlaw devices with such a configuration, so we have > to
2020 Jan 07
0
[PATCH v2] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On 2020/1/6 ??8:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:47:35AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2020/1/5 ??9:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by >>> VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending commands >>> through CTRL_VQ. So it does not make sense to >>> acknowledge
2020 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending commands through CTRL_VQ. So it does not make sense to acknowledge VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS without VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. The spec does not outlaw devices with such a configuration, so we have to support it. Simply clear VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS. Note that Linux is still
2020 Jan 05
2
[PATCH v2] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending commands through CTRL_VQ. So it does not make sense to acknowledge VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS without VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. The spec does not outlaw devices with such a configuration, so we have to support it. Simply clear VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS. Note that Linux is still
2019 Dec 22
0
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 10:54:23AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 9:57 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019
2020 Jan 07
1
[PATCH v2] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 10:29:08AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/1/6 ??8:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:47:35AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2020/1/5 ??9:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by > > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending
2020 Jan 06
2
[PATCH v2] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:47:35AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/1/5 ??9:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by > > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending commands > > through CTRL_VQ. So it does not make sense to > > acknowledge VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS without > >
2020 Jan 06
2
[PATCH v2] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:47:35AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/1/5 ??9:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > The only way for guest to control offloads (as enabled by > > VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS) is by sending commands > > through CTRL_VQ. So it does not make sense to > > acknowledge VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS without > >
2019 Dec 22
1
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 4:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 10:54:23AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 9:57 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11
2020 Jan 05
0
[PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:21:56PM -0800, Alistair Delva wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:12 PM Willem de Bruijn > <willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:56 PM Willem de Bruijn > > <willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > 00fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > > > > Call
2019 Dec 24
0
[PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On 2019/12/24 ??4:21, Alistair Delva wrote: > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:12 PM Willem de Bruijn > <willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:56 PM Willem de Bruijn >> <willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote: >>> 00fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 >>>>> Call Trace: >>>>> ?
2019 Dec 25
0
[PATCH net] virtio_net: CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS depends on CTRL_VQ
On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 3:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 12:12 PM Willem de Bruijn > <willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2019 at 2:56 PM Willem de Bruijn > > <willemdebruijn.kernel at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > 00fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > >
2019 Dec 22
0
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On devices without
2019 Dec 22
0
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > > kernel: > > > > kernel BUG at
2019 Dec 22
2
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 9:57 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22
2019 Dec 22
2
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 9:57 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 09:21:43AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22
2019 Dec 21
2
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > kernel: > > kernel BUG at drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1591! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > CPU: 1 PID: 483 Comm: Binder:330_1 Not
2019 Dec 21
2
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > implementation in crosvm[1], attempting to configure LRO will panic the > kernel: > > kernel BUG at drivers/net/virtio_net.c:1591! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > CPU: 1 PID: 483 Comm: Binder:330_1 Not
2019 Dec 22
2
[PATCH net] virtio-net: Skip set_features on non-cvq devices
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 8:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 10:08:41PM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 4:22 PM Alistair Delva <adelva at google.com> wrote: > > > > > > On devices without control virtqueue support, such as the virtio_net > > > implementation in crosvm[1],