similar to: [PATCH net 0/2] vsock/virtio: fix null-pointer dereference and related precautions

Previous to commit 22b5c0b63f32 ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug"), vsock_core_init() was called from virtio_vsock_probe(). Now, virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() can be called before vsock_core_init() has the chance to run. [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000110 [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] #PF error:

Previous to commit 22b5c0b63f32 ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug"), vsock_core_init() was called from virtio_vsock_probe(). Now, virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() can be called before vsock_core_init() has the chance to run. [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000110 [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] #PF error:

Previous to commit 22b5c0b63f32 ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug"), vsock_core_init() was called from virtio_vsock_probe(). Now, virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() can be called before vsock_core_init() has the chance to run. [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000110 [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] #PF error:

Previous to commit 22b5c0b63f32 ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug"), vsock_core_init() was called from virtio_vsock_probe(). Now, virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() can be called before vsock_core_init() has the chance to run. [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000110 [Wed Feb 27 14:17:09 2019] #PF error:

This series is based on v4.7. This RFC is the implementation for the new VIRTIO Socket device. It is developed in parallel with the VIRTIO device specification and proves the design. Once the specification has been accepted I will send a non-RFC version of this patch series. v6: * Add VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING ioctl to start/stop vhost cleanly * Add graceful shutdown to avoid port reuse while

This series is based on v4.7. This RFC is the implementation for the new VIRTIO Socket device. It is developed in parallel with the VIRTIO device specification and proves the design. Once the specification has been accepted I will send a non-RFC version of this patch series. v6: * Add VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING ioctl to start/stop vhost cleanly * Add graceful shutdown to avoid port reuse while

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

This series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use VSOCK with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using VMware

Hi Adalbert, thanks for catching this issue, I have a comment below. On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 08:01:45PM +0200, Adalbert Laz?r wrote: > Previous to commit 22b5c0b63f32 ("vsock/virtio: fix kernel panic after device hot-unplug"), > vsock_core_init() was called from virtio_vsock_probe(). Now, > virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() can be called before vsock_core_init() > has the

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

I run latest sparse from git on virtio drivers (turns out the version I had was rather outdated). This patchset fixes a couple of bugs this uncovered, and adds some annotations to make it sparse-clean. In particular, endian-ness is often tricky, so this patchset enabled endian-ness checks for sparse builds. Michael S. Tsirkin (10): virtio_console: drop unused config fields drm/virtio: fix

I run latest sparse from git on virtio drivers (turns out the version I had was rather outdated). This patchset fixes a couple of bugs this uncovered, and adds some annotations to make it sparse-clean. In particular, endian-ness is often tricky, so this patchset enabled endian-ness checks for sparse builds. Michael S. Tsirkin (10): virtio_console: drop unused config fields drm/virtio: fix