similar to: [PATCH] drm/simple-kms: Standardize arguments for callbacks

Passing the wrong type feels icky, everywhere else we use the pipe as the first parameter. Spotted while discussing patches with Thomas Zimmermann. Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> Cc: Noralf Tr?nnes <noralf at tronnes.org> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> Cc:

Passing the wrong type feels icky, everywhere else we use the pipe as the first parameter. Spotted while discussing patches with Thomas Zimmermann. Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> Cc: Noralf Tr?nnes <noralf at tronnes.org> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric at anholt.net> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com> Cc:

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:16 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > there are two types of callbacks in struct > drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs: functions that are genuine to simple KMS, > and functions that are merely forwarded from another structure (crtc, > plane, etc). > > In the former category are enable(), disable(), check(), and

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:16 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > there are two types of callbacks in struct > drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs: functions that are genuine to simple KMS, > and functions that are merely forwarded from another structure (crtc, > plane, etc). > > In the former category are enable(), disable(), check(), and

Hi, there are two types of callbacks in struct drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs: functions that are genuine to simple KMS, and functions that are merely forwarded from another structure (crtc, plane, etc). In the former category are enable(), disable(), check(), and update(). Those should probably receive a simple display pipe as their first argument. In the latter category are mode_valid(),

Hi Am 22.10.19 um 21:03 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 7:16 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> there are two types of callbacks in struct >> drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs: functions that are genuine to simple KMS, >> and functions that are merely forwarded from another structure (crtc, >> plane,

Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs.h | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_kms.c | 178 +++++++++--------------------- 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 131 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs.h index a7f6723bebdd..36f6ee725d13 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs.h +++

This set contains fixes for some "wouldn't it be nice if" issues, however most of the patches seen here have been on the MLs, but were left unreviewed. Lee Jones (42): drm/amd/amdgpu/atombios_encoders: Remove set but unused variable 'backlight_level' drm/armada/armada_overlay: Staticify local function 'armada_overlay_duplicate_state'

The ingenic driver uses empty implementations for its encoders. Replace the code with the generic simple encoder. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> --- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c | 12 +++--------- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 12 +++--------- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c | 17 +++-------------- drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tv.c

[sending again, as `git send-email` crashed!] This set contains fixes for some "wouldn't it be nice if" issues, however most of the patches seen here have been on the MLs, but were left unreviewed. Lee Jones (42): drm/amd/amdgpu/atombios_encoders: Remove set but unused variable 'backlight_level' drm/armada/armada_overlay: Staticify local function

Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 11:24, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > > confusing. Split them out. > > > > To make sure I

With this we can drop the final kfree from the release function. I also noticed that cirrus forgot to call drm_dev_fini(). v2: Don't call kfree(cirrus) after we've handed overship of that to drm_device and the drmm_ stuff. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> Cc:

Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:

Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:

Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is confusing. Split them out. To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of drm_crtc_helper.h includes. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc:

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > confusing. Split them out. > > To make sure I actually achieved the goal here I went through all > drivers. And indeed, all atomic drivers are now free of >

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 10:45:23AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 10:56:39PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:11:33AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > Having the probe helper stuff (which pretty much everyone needs) in > > > the drm_crtc_helper.h file (which atomic drivers should never need) is > > > confusing.

With this we can drop the final kfree from the release function. I also noticed that cirrus forgot to call drm_dev_fini(). v2: Don't call kfree(cirrus) after we've handed overship of that to drm_device and the drmm_ stuff. Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> Cc:

With this we can drop the final kfree from the release function. I also noticed that cirrus forgot to call drm_dev_fini(). v2: Don't call kfree(cirrus) after we've handed overship of that to drm_device and the drmm_ stuff. Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com> Cc: