similar to: [PATCH v2] virtio: add VIRTIO_RING_NO_LEGACY

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:53:44PM +0000, Matej Genci wrote: > Add macro to disable legacy functions vring_init and vring_size. > > Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> > --- > > V2: Put all legacy APIs inside guards. > > --- > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git

From: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Add macro to disable legacy vring functions. Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190911124942.243713-1-matej.genci at nutanix.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++++ 2

From: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Add macro to disable legacy vring functions. Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190911124942.243713-1-matej.genci at nutanix.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++++ 2

From: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Add macro to disable legacy vring functions. Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190911124942.243713-1-matej.genci at nutanix.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++++ 2

From: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Add macro to disable legacy vring functions. Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190911124942.243713-1-matej.genci at nutanix.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++++ 2

From: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Add macro to disable legacy vring functions. Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190911124942.243713-1-matej.genci at nutanix.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++++ 2

From: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Add macro to disable legacy vring functions. Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190911124942.243713-1-matej.genci at nutanix.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++++ 2

On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 12:42:14PM +0000, Matej Genci wrote: > Add macro to disable legacy functions vring_init and vring_size. > > Signed-off-by: Matej Genci <matej.genci at nutanix.com> > --- > include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_ring.h >

On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 04:48:41PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Introduce VIRTIO_RING_NO_LEGACY to support disabling legacy > macros and layout definitions. > > Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > VRING_AVAIL_ALIGN_SIZE, VRING_USED_ALIGN_SIZE and VRING_DESC_ALIGN_SIZE > are not pre-virtio

Introduce VIRTIO_RING_NO_LEGACY to support disabling legacy macros and layout definitions. Suggested-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> --- VRING_AVAIL_ALIGN_SIZE, VRING_USED_ALIGN_SIZE and VRING_DESC_ALIGN_SIZE are not pre-virtio 1.0, but can also be disabled by VIRTIO_RING_NO_LEGACY in this patch, because their names are not

On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 09:56:42AM +0000, Matej Genci wrote: > On 8/31/2019 6:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 05:58:23PM +0000, Matej Genci wrote: > >> On 8/30/2019 3:02 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 03:20:57PM +0000, Matej Genci wrote: > >>>> Compilers such as g++ 7.3 complain about assigning

On 2020/4/21 ??4:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The ring element addresses are passed between components with different > alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and > host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the > compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from > assuming pointer is aligned. > > This actually

On 2020/4/22 ??10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The ring element addresses are passed between components with different > alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and > host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the > compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from > assuming pointer is aligned. > > This actually

The ring element addresses are passed between components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from assuming pointer is aligned. This actually triggers on ARM with -mabi=apcs-gnu - which is a deprecated configuration, but it

The ring element addresses are passed between components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from assuming pointer is aligned. This actually triggers on ARM with -mabi=apcs-gnu - which is a deprecated configuration, but it

The ring element addresses are passed between components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from assuming pointer is aligned. This actually triggers on ARM with -mabi=apcs-gnu - which is a deprecated configuration, but it

On 28/08/20 14:21, Matej Genci wrote: > VirtIO 1.0 spec says > The removed and rescan events ... when sent for LUN 0, they MAY > apply to the entire target so the driver can ask the initiator > to rescan the target to detect this. > > This change introduces the behaviour described above by scanning the > entire scsi target when LUN is set to 0. This is both a

On 28/08/20 14:21, Matej Genci wrote: > VirtIO 1.0 spec says > The removed and rescan events ... when sent for LUN 0, they MAY > apply to the entire target so the driver can ask the initiator > to rescan the target to detect this. > > This change introduces the behaviour described above by scanning the > entire scsi target when LUN is set to 0. This is both a

The ring element addresses are passed between components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from assuming pointer is aligned. This actually triggers on ARM with -mabi=apcs-gnu - which is a deprecated configuration, but it

The ring element addresses are passed between components with different alignments assumptions. Thus, if guest/userspace selects a pointer and host then gets and dereferences it, we might need to decrease the compiler-selected alignment to prevent compiler on the host from assuming pointer is aligned. This actually triggers on ARM with -mabi=apcs-gnu - which is a deprecated configuration, but it