similar to: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 13/16] virtio-blk: limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 13/16] virtio-blk: limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids"

2019 Apr 27
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 65/79] virtio-blk: limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> [ Upstream commit bf348f9b78d413e75bb079462751a1d86b6de36c ] When tag_set->nr_maps is 1, the block layer limits the number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids. No matter how many hw queues are used by virtio-blk, as it has (tag_set->nr_maps == 1), it can use at most nr_cpu_ids hw queues. In addition, specifically for pci scenario, when the
2019 Apr 27
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 44/53] virtio-blk: limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> [ Upstream commit bf348f9b78d413e75bb079462751a1d86b6de36c ] When tag_set->nr_maps is 1, the block layer limits the number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids. No matter how many hw queues are used by virtio-blk, as it has (tag_set->nr_maps == 1), it can use at most nr_cpu_ids hw queues. In addition, specifically for pci scenario, when the
2019 Apr 27
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 26/32] virtio-blk: limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> [ Upstream commit bf348f9b78d413e75bb079462751a1d86b6de36c ] When tag_set->nr_maps is 1, the block layer limits the number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids. No matter how many hw queues are used by virtio-blk, as it has (tag_set->nr_maps == 1), it can use at most nr_cpu_ids hw queues. In addition, specifically for pci scenario, when the
2019 Mar 27
0
[PATCH 1/2] virtio-blk: limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids
When tag_set->nr_maps is 1, the block layer limits the number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids. No matter how many hw queues are used by virtio-blk, as it has (tag_set->nr_maps == 1), it can use at most nr_cpu_ids hw queues. In addition, specifically for pci scenario, when the 'num-queues' specified by qemu is more than maxcpus, virtio-blk would not be able to allocate more than maxcpus
2019 Mar 27
6
[PATCH 0/2] Limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids for virtio-blk and virtio-scsi
When tag_set->nr_maps is 1, the block layer limits the number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids. No matter how many hw queues are use by virtio-blk/virtio-scsi, as they both have (tag_set->nr_maps == 1), they can use at most nr_cpu_ids hw queues. In addition, specifically for pci scenario, when the 'num-queues' specified by qemu is more than maxcpus, virtio-blk/virtio-scsi would not be
2019 Mar 27
0
[PATCH 2/2] scsi: virtio_scsi: limit number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids
When tag_set->nr_maps is 1, the block layer limits the number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids. No matter how many hw queues are used by virtio-scsi, as it has (tag_set->nr_maps == 1), it can use at most nr_cpu_ids hw queues. In addition, specifically for pci scenario, when the 'num_queues' specified by qemu is more than maxcpus, virtio-scsi would not be able to allocate more than maxcpus
2019 Mar 14
0
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:12:32 +0800 Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > On 3/13/19 5:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:26:04 +0800 > > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > > > >> On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) > >>> Dongli
2019 Mar 15
0
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
On 2019/3/14 ??2:12, Dongli Zhang wrote: > > On 3/13/19 5:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:26:04 +0800 >> Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) >>>> Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote:
2019 Mar 14
4
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
On 3/13/19 5:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:26:04 +0800 > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > >> On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) >>> Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I observed that there is one msix vector for
2019 Mar 14
4
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
On 3/13/19 5:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:26:04 +0800 > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > >> On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) >>> Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I observed that there is one msix vector for
2019 Mar 20
0
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
On 2019/3/19 ??10:22, Dongli Zhang wrote: > Hi Jason, > > On 3/18/19 3:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2019/3/15 ??8:41, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:50:11 +0800 >>> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Or something like I proposed several years ago? >>>>
2019 Mar 19
3
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
Hi Jason, On 3/18/19 3:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/3/15 ??8:41, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:50:11 +0800 >> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Or something like I proposed several years ago? >>> https://do-db2.lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/25/169 >>> >>> Btw, for virtio-net, I think we actually
2019 Mar 19
3
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
Hi Jason, On 3/18/19 3:47 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/3/15 ??8:41, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:50:11 +0800 >> Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> >>> Or something like I proposed several years ago? >>> https://do-db2.lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/25/169 >>> >>> Btw, for virtio-net, I think we actually
2016 Jun 18
2
[PATCH] drivers: virtio_blk: notify blk-core when hw-queue number changes
On 13/06/2016 11:58, Bob Liu wrote: > A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the > blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git
2016 Jun 18
2
[PATCH] drivers: virtio_blk: notify blk-core when hw-queue number changes
On 13/06/2016 11:58, Bob Liu wrote: > A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the > blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. > > Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git
2016 Jul 28
0
[PATCH] drivers: virtio_blk: notify blk-core when hw-queue number changes
On 06/19/2016 06:10 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 13/06/2016 11:58, Bob Liu wrote: >> A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the >> blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> >> --- >> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c |
2019 Mar 13
2
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > >> I observed that there is one msix vector for config and one shared vector >> for all queues in below qemu cmdline, when the num-queues for virtio-blk >> is more than the number of possible cpus: >> >> qemu:
2019 Mar 13
2
virtio-blk: should num_vqs be limited by num_possible_cpus()?
On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > >> I observed that there is one msix vector for config and one shared vector >> for all queues in below qemu cmdline, when the num-queues for virtio-blk >> is more than the number of possible cpus: >> >> qemu:
2016 Jun 13
0
[PATCH] drivers: virtio_blk: notify blk-core when hw-queue number changes
A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 42758b5..c169238 100644 ---
2016 Jun 13
0
[PATCH] drivers: virtio_blk: notify blk-core when hw-queue number changes
A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 42758b5..c169238 100644 ---