similar to: [PATCH v2 00/17] Share TTM code among DRM framebuffer drivers

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

Several simple framebuffer drivers copy most of the TTM code from each other. The implementation is always the same; except for the name of some data structures. As recently discussed, this patch set provides generic memory-management code for simple framebuffers with dedicated video memory. It further converts the respective drivers to the generic code. The shared code is basically the same

A kernel test bot reported a problem with the locktorture testcase that was triggered by the GEM VRAM helpers. ... [ 10.004734] RIP: 0010:ttm_bo_validate+0x41/0x141 [ttm] ... [ 10.015669] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0xd [ 10.016157] ? get_lock_stats+0x11/0x3f [ 10.016607] drm_gem_vram_pin+0x77/0xa2 [drm_vram_helper] [ 10.017229]

A kernel test bot reported a problem with the locktorture testcase that was triggered by the GEM VRAM helpers. ... [ 10.004734] RIP: 0010:ttm_bo_validate+0x41/0x141 [ttm] ... [ 10.015669] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x5/0xd [ 10.016157] ? get_lock_stats+0x11/0x3f [ 10.016607] drm_gem_vram_pin+0x77/0xa2 [drm_vram_helper] [ 10.017229]

VRAM MM and GEM VRAM are only used with each other. This patch set moves VRAM MM into GEM VRAM source files and cleans up the helper's public interface. Thomas Zimmermann (4): drm/vram: Move VRAM memory manager to GEM VRAM implementation drm/vram: Have VRAM MM call GEM VRAM functions directly drm/vram: Unexport internal functions of VRAM MM drm/vram: Unconditonally set BO call-back

VRAM MM and GEM VRAM are only used with each other. This patch set moves VRAM MM into GEM VRAM source files and cleans up the helper's public interface. Version 2 of the patch set doesn't contain functional changes. I'm reposting due to the rebasing onto the debugfs patches. v2: * updated for debugfs support * fixed typos in comments Thomas Zimmermann (4): drm/vram: Move VRAM

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:27:45PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The new interfaces drm_gem_vram_{pin/unpin}_reserved() are variants of the > GEM VRAM pin/unpin functions that do not reserve the BO during validation. > The mgag200 driver requires this behavior for its cursor handling. The > patch also converts the driver to use the new interfaces. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas

On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:27:45PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The new interfaces drm_gem_vram_{pin/unpin}_reserved() are variants of the > GEM VRAM pin/unpin functions that do not reserve the BO during validation. > The mgag200 driver requires this behavior for its cursor handling. The > patch also converts the driver to use the new interfaces. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas

Am 20.05.19 um 18:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > [CAUTION: External Email] > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 06:19:00PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 06:27:45PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>> The new interfaces drm_gem_vram_{pin/unpin}_reserved() are variants of the >>> GEM VRAM pin/unpin functions that do not reserve the BO during validation.

Hi Thomas. Some minor things and some bikeshedding too. One general^Wbikeshedding thing - unint32_t is used in many places. And then s64 in one place. Seems like two concepts are mixed. Maybe be consistent and use u32, s32 everywhere? I did not read the code carefully enough to understand it. I cannot give a r-b or a-b - as I feel I need to understand it to do so. Sam On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at

Hi Thomas. Some minor things and some bikeshedding too. One general^Wbikeshedding thing - unint32_t is used in many places. And then s64 in one place. Seems like two concepts are mixed. Maybe be consistent and use u32, s32 everywhere? I did not read the code carefully enough to understand it. I cannot give a r-b or a-b - as I feel I need to understand it to do so. Sam On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at

Not needed any more because we don't have vram specific fops any more. DEFINE_DRM_GEM_FOPS() can be used instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- include/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.h | 18 ---- include/drm/drm_vram_mm_helper.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.c | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c

Not needed any more because we don't have vram specific fops any more. DEFINE_DRM_GEM_FOPS() can be used instead. Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com> --- include/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.h | 18 ---- include/drm/drm_vram_mm_helper.h | 82 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.c | 5 +- drivers/gpu/drm/bochs/bochs_drv.c

DRM client buffers are permanently mapped throughout their lifetime. This prevents us from using generic framebuffer emulation for devices with small dedicated video memory, such as ast or mgag200. With fb buffers permanently mapped, such devices often won't have enougth space left to display other content (e.g., X11). This patch set introduces unmappable DRM client buffers for framebuffer

DRM client buffers are permanently mapped throughout their lifetime. This prevents us from using generic framebuffer emulation for devices with small dedicated video memory, such as ast or mgag200. With fb buffers permanently mapped, such devices often won't have enougth space left to display other content (e.g., X11). This patch set introduces unmappable DRM client buffers for framebuffer

DRM's fbdev console uses regular load and store operations to update framebuffer memory. The bochs driver on sparc64 requires the use of I/O-specific load and store operations. We have a workaround, but need a long-term solution to the problem. This patchset changes GEM's vmap/vunmap interfaces to forward pointers of type struct dma_buf_map and updates the generic fbdev emulation to use

DRM's fbdev console uses regular load and store operations to update framebuffer memory. The bochs driver on sparc64 requires the use of I/O-specific load and store operations. We have a workaround, but need a long-term solution to the problem. This patchset changes GEM's vmap/vunmap interfaces to forward pointers of type struct dma_buf_map and updates the generic fbdev emulation to use