Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "[PULL] virtio,vhost: cleanups and fixes"
2019 Feb 05
2
[PATCH 0/5 v6] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous
> versions can be found here:
>
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
>
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
>
> V3:
2019 Feb 05
2
[PATCH 0/5 v6] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous
> versions can be found here:
>
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
>
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
>
> V3:
2019 Feb 07
5
[PATCH v7 0/5] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB
Hi,
here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous
versions can be found here:
V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
V3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123163049.24863-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
V4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190129084342.26030-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
2019 Feb 05
0
[vhost:linux-next 3/23] include/linux/swiotlb.h:105:20: error: static declaration of 'is_swiotlb_active' follows non-static declaration
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next
head: 104f89a60ef5ec77d6f559eac4676844b3480740
commit: 155fcd8511de5f99c27a726e9153b87cce528b6e [3/23] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-8 (Debian 8.2.0-14) 8.2.0
reproduce:
git checkout 155fcd8511de5f99c27a726e9153b87cce528b6e
#
2019 Feb 07
0
[PATCH v7 2/5] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
This function will be used from dma_direct code to determine
the maximum segment size of a dma mapping.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk at oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
---
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 9
2019 Feb 07
0
[PATCH v7 3/5] dma: Introduce dma_max_mapping_size()
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de>
The function returns the maximum size that can be mapped
using DMA-API functions. The patch also adds the
implementation for direct DMA and a new dma_map_ops pointer
so that other implementations can expose their limit.
Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk at oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:54:37AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of
> a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc.
> This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX.
>
> An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c:
> u32 v, max_size;
>
> max_size =
2023 Jul 04
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:54:37AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of
> a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc.
> This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX.
>
> An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c:
> u32 v, max_size;
>
> max_size =
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote:
> > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of
> > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc.
> > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX.
> >
>
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:44?AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote:
> > > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of
> > > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct
2019 Jul 22
2
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:55:09PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA
> mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with
> a virtual IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
2019 Jul 22
2
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:55:09PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA
> mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with
> a virtual IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
2023 May 10
2
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote:
> Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of
> a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc.
> This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX.
>
> An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c:
> u32 v, max_size;
>
>
2023 May 10
3
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of
a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc.
This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX.
An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c:
u32 v, max_size;
max_size = virtio_max_dma_size(vdev); -> implicit convert
err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX,
2023 May 18
0
[PATCH 4/4] swiotlb: unexport is_swiotlb_active
Drivers have no business looking at dma-mapping or swiotlb internals.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index af2e304c672c43..9f1fd28264a067 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -921,7 +921,6 @@ bool is_swiotlb_active(struct
2019 Feb 05
0
[vhost:linux-next 2/23] include/linux/swiotlb.h:99:22: error: static declaration of 'swiotlb_max_mapping_size' follows non-static declaration
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next
head: 104f89a60ef5ec77d6f559eac4676844b3480740
commit: 951a381d4c0d45a9b44de30228c6ef17083854ea [2/23] swiotlb: Introduce swiotlb_max_mapping_size()
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-8 (Debian 8.2.0-14) 8.2.0
reproduce:
git checkout 951a381d4c0d45a9b44de30228c6ef17083854ea
#
2019 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On 22/07/2019 15:55, Eric Auger wrote:
> Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA
> mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with
> a virtual IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at
2019 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On 22/07/2019 15:55, Eric Auger wrote:
> Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA
> mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with
> a virtual IOMMU.
>
> Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at
2019 Jul 22
0
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA
mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference.
This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with
a virtual IOMMU.
Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()")
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
---
2019 Jul 22
6
[PATCH 0/2] Fix NULL pointer dereference with virtio-blk-pci and virtual IOMMU
When running a guest featuring a virtio-blk-pci protected with a virtual
IOMMU we hit a NULL pointer dereference.
This series removes the dma_max_mapping_size() call in
virtio_max_dma_size when the device does not have any dma_mask set.
A check is also added to early return in dma_addressing_limited()
if the dma_mask is NULL.
Eric Auger (2):
dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited against