similar to: [PATCH 0/5 v6] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 0/5 v6] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB"

2019 Feb 07
5
[PATCH v7 0/5] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB
Hi, here is the next version of this patch-set. Previous versions can be found here: V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190110134433.15672-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ V2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190115132257.6426-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ V3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190123163049.24863-1-joro at 8bytes.org/ V4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190129084342.26030-1-joro at 8bytes.org/
2019 Mar 10
0
[PULL] virtio,vhost: cleanups and fixes
The following changes since commit 1c163f4c7b3f621efff9b28a47abb36f7378d783: Linux 5.0 (2019-03-03 15:21:29 -0800) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to cfdbb4ed31aa777d59b288810f66eb06249ee5b7: vhost: silence an unused-variable warning (2019-03-06 11:32:37 -0500)
2019 Feb 05
0
[vhost:linux-next 3/23] include/linux/swiotlb.h:105:20: error: static declaration of 'is_swiotlb_active' follows non-static declaration
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next head: 104f89a60ef5ec77d6f559eac4676844b3480740 commit: 155fcd8511de5f99c27a726e9153b87cce528b6e [3/23] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-8 (Debian 8.2.0-14) 8.2.0 reproduce: git checkout 155fcd8511de5f99c27a726e9153b87cce528b6e #
2019 Feb 07
0
[PATCH v7 2/5] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> This function will be used from dma_direct code to determine the maximum segment size of a dma mapping. Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk at oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> --- include/linux/swiotlb.h | 6 ++++++ kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 9
2019 Feb 07
0
[PATCH v7 3/5] dma: Introduce dma_max_mapping_size()
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel at suse.de> The function returns the maximum size that can be mapped using DMA-API functions. The patch also adds the implementation for direct DMA and a new dma_map_ops pointer so that other implementations can expose their limit. Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk at oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
2019 Jul 22
6
[PATCH 0/2] Fix NULL pointer dereference with virtio-blk-pci and virtual IOMMU
When running a guest featuring a virtio-blk-pci protected with a virtual IOMMU we hit a NULL pointer dereference. This series removes the dma_max_mapping_size() call in virtio_max_dma_size when the device does not have any dma_mask set. A check is also added to early return in dma_addressing_limited() if the dma_mask is NULL. Eric Auger (2): dma-mapping: Protect dma_addressing_limited against
2019 Feb 07
0
[PATCH 0/5 v6] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB
Hi Michael, On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 03:52:38PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 05:33:58PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > > Changes to v5 are: > > > > - Changed patch 3 to uninline dma_max_mapping_size() > > And this lead to problems reported by kbuild :( Hmm, I didn't get any kbuild emails for this series. Can you please forward it me so
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:54:37AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote: > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: > u32 v, max_size; > > max_size =
2023 Jul 04
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 10:54:37AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote: > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: > u32 v, max_size; > > max_size =
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > >
2023 May 10
1
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:44?AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 11:26:54AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote: > > On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > > > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > > > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct
2019 Jul 22
2
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:55:09PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA > mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. > > This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with > a virtual IOMMU. > > Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()") > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
2019 Jul 22
2
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:55:09PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA > mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. > > This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with > a virtual IOMMU. > > Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()") > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
2023 May 10
2
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
On Wed, 10 May 2023 10:54:37 +0800, zhenwei pi <pizhenwei at bytedance.com> wrote: > Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of > a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. > This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. > > An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: > u32 v, max_size; > >
2023 May 10
3
[PATCH] virtio_ring: use u32 for virtio_max_dma_size
Both split ring and packed ring use 32bits to describe the length of a descriptor: see struct vring_desc and struct vring_packed_desc. This means the max segment size supported by virtio is U32_MAX. An example of virtio_max_dma_size in virtio_blk.c: u32 v, max_size; max_size = virtio_max_dma_size(vdev); -> implicit convert err = virtio_cread_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX,
2019 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On 22/07/2019 15:55, Eric Auger wrote: > Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA > mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. > > This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with > a virtual IOMMU. > > Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()") > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at
2019 Jul 22
4
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On 22/07/2019 15:55, Eric Auger wrote: > Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA > mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. > > This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with > a virtual IOMMU. > > Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()") > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at
2019 Jul 22
0
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with a virtual IOMMU. Fixes: e6d6dd6c875e ("virtio: Introduce virtio_max_dma_size()") Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger at redhat.com> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de> ---
2019 Jul 23
0
[PATCH 2/2] virtio/virtio_ring: Fix the dma_max_mapping_size call
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:33:35AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:55:09PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote: > > Do not call dma_max_mapping_size for devices that have no DMA > > mask set, otherwise we can hit a NULL pointer dereference. > > > > This occurs when a virtio-blk-pci device is protected with > > a virtual IOMMU. > > >
2019 Feb 05
0
[vhost:linux-next 2/23] include/linux/swiotlb.h:99:22: error: static declaration of 'swiotlb_max_mapping_size' follows non-static declaration
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next head: 104f89a60ef5ec77d6f559eac4676844b3480740 commit: 951a381d4c0d45a9b44de30228c6ef17083854ea [2/23] swiotlb: Introduce swiotlb_max_mapping_size() config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-8 (Debian 8.2.0-14) 8.2.0 reproduce: git checkout 951a381d4c0d45a9b44de30228c6ef17083854ea #