similar to: [PATCH net-next V3] virtio_net: ethtool tx napi configuration

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net-next V3] virtio_net: ethtool tx napi configuration"

2018 Sep 13
5
[PATCH net-next V2] virtio_net: ethtool tx napi configuration
Implement ethtool .set_coalesce (-C) and .get_coalesce (-c) handlers. Interrupt moderation is currently not supported, so these accept and display the default settings of 0 usec and 1 frame. Toggle tx napi through a bit in tx-frames. So as to not interfere with possible future interrupt moderation, value 1 means tx napi while value 0 means not. To properly synchronize with the data path, tx napi
2018 Sep 13
5
[PATCH net-next V2] virtio_net: ethtool tx napi configuration
Implement ethtool .set_coalesce (-C) and .get_coalesce (-c) handlers. Interrupt moderation is currently not supported, so these accept and display the default settings of 0 usec and 1 frame. Toggle tx napi through a bit in tx-frames. So as to not interfere with possible future interrupt moderation, value 1 means tx napi while value 0 means not. To properly synchronize with the data path, tx napi
2018 Sep 13
0
[PATCH net-next V2] virtio_net: ethtool tx napi configuration
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 1:40 AM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > Implement ethtool .set_coalesce (-C) and .get_coalesce (-c) handlers. > Interrupt moderation is currently not supported, so these accept and > display the default settings of 0 usec and 1 frame. > > Toggle tx napi through a bit in tx-frames. So as to not interfere > with possible future
2015 Feb 09
0
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 12 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+) diff
2015 Feb 09
0
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 12 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+) diff
2015 Feb 10
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, which means we'd deprecate this in the next virtio standard. I think the right answer is to extend like we did with
2015 Feb 10
4
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, which means we'd deprecate this in the next virtio standard. I think the right answer is to extend like we did with
2015 Feb 10
0
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: > > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. > > The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt > coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, > which means we'd deprecate this in
2015 Feb 10
0
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:02:37PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: > > This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. > > The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt > coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, > which means we'd deprecate this in
2015 Feb 10
0
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: >> This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. > > The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt > coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, > which means
2015 Feb 10
0
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 4/6] virtio-net: add basic interrupt coalescing support
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty at rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> writes: >> This patch enables the interrupt coalescing setting through ethtool. > > The problem is that there's nothing network specific about interrupt > coalescing. I can see other devices wanting exactly the same thing, > which means
2023 Jul 27
2
[PATCH net-next V4 2/3] virtio_net: support per queue interrupt coalesce command
On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 16:07 +0300, Gavin Li wrote: > Add interrupt_coalesce config in send_queue and receive_queue to cache user > config. > > Send per virtqueue interrupt moderation config to underlying device in > order to have more efficient interrupt moderation and cpu utilization of > guest VM. > > Additionally, address all the VQs when updating the global
2023 Jul 28
1
[PATCH net-next V4 2/3] virtio_net: support per queue interrupt coalesce command
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 03:28:32PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 16:07 +0300, Gavin Li wrote: > > Add interrupt_coalesce config in send_queue and receive_queue to cache user > > config. > > > > Send per virtqueue interrupt moderation config to underlying device in > > order to have more efficient interrupt moderation and cpu utilization of >
2018 Oct 11
0
[PATCH net-next V3] virtio_net: ethtool tx napi configuration
From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 10:06:26 +0800 > Implement ethtool .set_coalesce (-C) and .get_coalesce (-c) handlers. > Interrupt moderation is currently not supported, so these accept and > display the default settings of 0 usec and 1 frame. > > Toggle tx napi through setting tx-frames. So as to not interfere > with possible future
2015 Feb 09
10
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 0/6] enable tx interrupts for virtio-net
Hi: This is a new version of trying to enable tx interrupts for virtio-net. We used to try to avoid tx interrupts and orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks socket accounting and can lead serveral other side effects e.g: - Several other functions which depends on socket accounting can not work correctly (e.g TCP Small Queue) - No tx completion which make BQL or
2015 Feb 09
10
[PATCH RFC v5 net-next 0/6] enable tx interrupts for virtio-net
Hi: This is a new version of trying to enable tx interrupts for virtio-net. We used to try to avoid tx interrupts and orphan packets before transmission for virtio-net. This breaks socket accounting and can lead serveral other side effects e.g: - Several other functions which depends on socket accounting can not work correctly (e.g TCP Small Queue) - No tx completion which make BQL or
2017 Jan 06
2
[PATCH V4 net-next 3/3] tun: rx batching
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:13:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often > lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do > some batching during rx before submitting them to host network > stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from > sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet
2017 Jan 06
2
[PATCH V4 net-next 3/3] tun: rx batching
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 10:13:17AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often > lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do > some batching during rx before submitting them to host network > stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from > sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet
2019 Jan 02
1
[PATCH RFC 1/2] virtio-net: bql support
On 2018/12/31 ??2:48, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 06:04:53PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2018/12/26 ??11:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 04:17:36PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> On 2018/12/6 ??6:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> When use_napi is set, let's enable BQLs. Note: some of the issues
2017 Jan 18
0
[PATCH net-next V5 3/3] tun: rx batching
We can only process 1 packet at one time during sendmsg(). This often lead bad cache utilization under heavy load. So this patch tries to do some batching during rx before submitting them to host network stack. This is done through accepting MSG_MORE as a hint from sendmsg() caller, if it was set, batch the packet temporarily in a linked list and submit them all once MSG_MORE were cleared. Tests