similar to: [RFC] VSOCK: About Virtio-vsock support "Multiqueue" feature ?

On 2018/11/15 15:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:56:03AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >> >> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net". >> This idea has two advantages: >> First, it can use many great features of virtio-net, like batching, >> mergeable rx

On 2018/11/15 15:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 11:56:03AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >> >> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net". >> This idea has two advantages: >> First, it can use many great features of virtio-net, like batching, >> mergeable rx

On 2018/11/6 11:32, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/6 ??11:17, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/6 10:41, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/6 ??10:17, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> On 2018/11/5 17:21, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> On 2018/11/5 ??3:43, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>>>> Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve

On 2018/11/6 11:32, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/6 ??11:17, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/6 10:41, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/6 ??10:17, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> On 2018/11/5 17:21, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> On 2018/11/5 ??3:43, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>>>> Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 10:21:40AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > On 2018/12/4 9:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:10:58AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > >> On 2018/11/30 21:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 2018/11/30 ??8:55, Jason Wang

Hi Stefan & All: Now I find vhost-vsock has two performance problems even if it is not designed for performance. First, I think vhost-vsock should faster than vhost-net because it is no TCP/IP stack, but the real test result vhost-net is 5~10 times than vhost-vsock, currently I am looking for the reason. Second, vhost-vsock only supports two vqs(tx and rx), that means if multiple sockets in

Hi Stefan & All: Now I find vhost-vsock has two performance problems even if it is not designed for performance. First, I think vhost-vsock should faster than vhost-net because it is no TCP/IP stack, but the real test result vhost-net is 5~10 times than vhost-vsock, currently I am looking for the reason. Second, vhost-vsock only supports two vqs(tx and rx), that means if multiple sockets in

On 2018/11/5 17:21, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/5 ??3:43, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve >> high performance. As previous discussed with Jason Wang, I revisit the >> idea of vhost-net about mergeable rx buffer and implement the mergeable >> rx buffer in vhost-vsock, it can allow big packet to be

On 2018/11/5 17:21, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/5 ??3:43, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve >> high performance. As previous discussed with Jason Wang, I revisit the >> idea of vhost-net about mergeable rx buffer and implement the mergeable >> rx buffer in vhost-vsock, it can allow big packet to be

Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve high performance. As previous discussed with Jason Wang, I revisit the idea of vhost-net about mergeable rx buffer and implement the mergeable rx buffer in vhost-vsock, it can allow big packet to be scattered in into different buffers and improve performance obviously. I write a tool to test the vhost-vsock performance, mainly

Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve high performance. As previous discussed with Jason Wang, I revisit the idea of vhost-net about mergeable rx buffer and implement the mergeable rx buffer in vhost-vsock, it can allow big packet to be scattered in into different buffers and improve performance obviously. I write a tool to test the vhost-vsock performance, mainly

On 2018/11/6 10:41, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/6 ??10:17, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/5 17:21, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/5 ??3:43, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve >>>> high performance. As previous discussed with Jason Wang, I revisit the >>>> idea of vhost-net

On 2018/11/6 10:41, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/6 ??10:17, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/5 17:21, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/5 ??3:43, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> Now vsock only support send/receive small packet, it can't achieve >>>> high performance. As previous discussed with Jason Wang, I revisit the >>>> idea of vhost-net

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:10:58AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > On 2018/11/30 21:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> On 2018/11/30 ??8:55, Jason Wang wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>>> If you want to compare it with

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:10:58AM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: > On 2018/11/30 21:40, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> On 2018/11/30 ??8:55, Jason Wang wrote: > >>> > >>> On 2018/11/30 ??8:52, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>>>>> If you want to compare it with

On 2018/11/15 16:19, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/15 ??2:46, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/15 12:19, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/15 ??11:56, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >>>> >>>> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net". >>>> This idea has two

On 2018/11/15 16:19, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/15 ??2:46, jiangyiwen wrote: >> On 2018/11/15 12:19, Jason Wang wrote: >>> On 2018/11/15 ??11:56, jiangyiwen wrote: >>>> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >>>> >>>> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net". >>>> This idea has two

On 2018/11/15 12:19, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/15 ??11:56, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >> >> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net". >> This idea has two advantages: >> First, it can use many great features of virtio-net, like batching, >> mergeable rx buffer and multiqueue,

On 2018/11/15 12:19, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2018/11/15 ??11:56, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, >> >> Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net". >> This idea has two advantages: >> First, it can use many great features of virtio-net, like batching, >> mergeable rx buffer and multiqueue,

Hi Stefan, Michael, Jason and everyone, Several days ago, I discussed with jason about "Vsock over Virtio-net". This idea has two advantages: First, it can use many great features of virtio-net, like batching, mergeable rx buffer and multiqueue, etc. Second, it can reduce many duplicate codes and make it easy to be maintained. Before the implement, I want to discuss with everyone