Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net-next v9 0/6] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop"
2018 Sep 25
6
[REBASE PATCH net-next v9 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4
Tonghao Zhang (4):
net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
net: vhost: factor out busy
2018 Aug 01
5
[PATCH net-next v7 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4.
v6->v7:
fix issue and rebase codes:
1. on tx, busypoll will vhost_net_disable/enable_vq rx vq.
[This is suggested by Toshiaki Makita
2018 Jul 21
7
[PATCH net-next v6 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue
at the same time. handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4.
v5->v6:
rebase the codes.
Tonghao Zhang (4):
net: vhost: lock the vqs one by one
net: vhost: replace magic number of lock annotation
2018 Aug 01
2
[PATCH net-next v7 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018?08?01? 11:00, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> In the handle_tx, the busypoll will vhost_net_disable/enable_vq
> because we
2018 Aug 01
2
[PATCH net-next v7 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018?08?01? 11:00, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> In the handle_tx, the busypoll will vhost_net_disable/enable_vq
> because we
2018 Dec 11
2
[PATCH net 2/4] vhost_net: rework on the lock ordering for busy polling
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 05:44:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> When we try to do rx busy polling in tx path in commit 441abde4cd84
> ("net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path"), we lock rx vq mutex
> after tx vq mutex is held. This may lead deadlock so we try to lock vq
> one by one in commit 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by
> one"). With this
2018 Dec 11
2
[PATCH net 2/4] vhost_net: rework on the lock ordering for busy polling
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 05:44:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> When we try to do rx busy polling in tx path in commit 441abde4cd84
> ("net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path"), we lock rx vq mutex
> after tx vq mutex is held. This may lead deadlock so we try to lock vq
> one by one in commit 78139c94dc8c ("net: vhost: lock the vqs one by
> one"). With this
2018 Dec 11
2
[PATCH net 2/4] vhost_net: rework on the lock ordering for busy polling
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:06:43AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2018/12/11 ??9:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 05:44:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > When we try to do rx busy polling in tx path in commit 441abde4cd84
> > > ("net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path"), we lock rx vq mutex
> > > after tx vq mutex is
2018 Dec 11
2
[PATCH net 2/4] vhost_net: rework on the lock ordering for busy polling
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:06:43AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2018/12/11 ??9:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 05:44:52PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > When we try to do rx busy polling in tx path in commit 441abde4cd84
> > > ("net: vhost: add rx busy polling in tx path"), we lock rx vq mutex
> > > after tx vq mutex is
2018 Jul 04
8
[PATCH net-next v5 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive and transmit performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time.
handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4.
v4 -> v5:
fix some issues
v3 -> v4:
fix some issues
v2 -> v3:
This patches are splited from previous big patch:
2018 Jul 04
8
[PATCH net-next v5 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive and transmit performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time.
handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4.
v4 -> v5:
fix some issues
v3 -> v4:
fix some issues
v2 -> v3:
This patches are splited from previous big patch:
2018 Jul 02
5
[PATCH net-next v4 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive and transmit performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time.
handle_rx do that in the same way.
For more performance report, see patch 4.
v3 -> v4:
fix some issues
v2 -> v3:
This patches are splited from previous big patch:
2018 Jul 03
2
[PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018?07?02? 20:57, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao at didichuxing.com>
> ---
>
2018 Jul 03
2
[PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018?07?02? 20:57, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao at didichuxing.com>
> ---
>
2018 Jun 30
9
[PATCH net-next v3 0/4] net: vhost: improve performance when enable busyloop
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
This patches improve the guest receive and transmit performance.
On the handle_tx side, we poll the sock receive queue at the same time.
handle_rx do that in the same way.
This patches are splited from previous big patch:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/934673/
For more performance report, see patch 4.
Tonghao Zhang (4):
net: vhost:
2018 Jul 03
1
[PATCH net-next v4 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018?07?03? 13:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:12 AM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018?07?02? 20:57, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
>>> used for in tx path in the
2018 Jul 02
1
[PATCH net-next v3 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018?06?30? 14:33, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao at didichuxing.com>
> ---
>
2018 Jul 23
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> ---
...
>
2018 Jul 23
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> ---
...
>
2018 Jul 24
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/24 2:31, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:20 PM Toshiaki Makita
> <toshiaki.makita1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/07/23 (?) 21:43, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:58 PM Toshiaki Makita
>>> <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at