similar to: [PATCH] vhost/scsi: truncate T10 PI iov_iter to prot_bytes

The following patches were made over Linus's tree and fix an issue where windows guests will send iovecs with offset/lengths that result in IOs that are not aligned to 512. The LIO layer will then send them to Linux's block layer but it requires 512 byte alignment, so depending on the block driver being used we will get IO errors or hung IO. The following patches have vhost-scsi detect

This is to silence an uninitialized variable warning in debug output. The problem is this line: pr_debug("vhost_get_vq_desc: head: %d, out: %u in: %u\n", head, out, in); If "head == vq->num" is true on the first iteration then "out" and "in" aren't initialized. We handle that a few lines after the printk. I was tempted to just delete the

This is to silence an uninitialized variable warning in debug output. The problem is this line: pr_debug("vhost_get_vq_desc: head: %d, out: %u in: %u\n", head, out, in); If "head == vq->num" is true on the first iteration then "out" and "in" aren't initialized. We handle that a few lines after the printk. I was tempted to just delete the

The following patches were made over Linus's tree and fix an issue where windows guests will send iovecs with offset/lengths that result in IOs that are not aligned to 512. The LIO layer will then send them to Linux's FS/block layer but it requires 512 byte alignment, so depending on the FS/block driver being used we will get IO errors or hung IO. The following patches have vhost-scsi

Hi: This series try to prvernt a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Jason Wang (4): vhost: introduce vhost_exceeds_weight() vhost_net: fix possible

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

Hi: This series try to prevent a guest triggerable CPU hogging through vhost kthread. This is done by introducing and checking the weight after each requrest. The patch has been tested with reproducer of vsock and virtio-net. Only compile test is done for vhost-scsi. Please review. This addresses CVE-2019-3900. Changs from V1: - fix user-ater-free in vosck patch Jason Wang (4): vhost:

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -

Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V5 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/138. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on TX PPS when doing pktgen from guest to host. No ovbious improvement on RX PPS. We can do lots of optimizations on top but for simple

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test

The following changes since commit 84df9525b0c27f3ebc2ebb1864fa62a97fdedb7d: Linux 4.19 (2018-10-22 07:37:37 +0100) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 79f800b2e76923cd8ce0aa659cb5c019d9643bc9: MAINTAINERS: remove reference to bogus vsock file (2018-10-24 21:16:14 -0400)

The following changes since commit 84df9525b0c27f3ebc2ebb1864fa62a97fdedb7d: Linux 4.19 (2018-10-22 07:37:37 +0100) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 79f800b2e76923cd8ce0aa659cb5c019d9643bc9: MAINTAINERS: remove reference to bogus vsock file (2018-10-24 21:16:14 -0400)

On Wed, Aug 08, 2018 at 01:29:55PM -0600, Greg Edwards wrote: > The current value of VHOST_SCSI_PREALLOC_PROT_SGLS is too small to > accommodate larger I/Os, e.g. 16-32 MiB, when the VIRTIO_SCSI_F_T10_PI > feature bit is negotiated and the backing store supports T10 PI. > > vhost-scsi rejects the command with errors like: > > [ 59.581317] vhost_scsi_calc_sgls: requested

Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when