Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items"
2018 Aug 05
2
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
On 25/07/2018 10:59 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:40:12 +0300
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>>
>>> Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis.
2018 Aug 05
2
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
On 25/07/2018 10:59 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:40:12 +0300
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
>>>
>>> Add some ethtool stat items useful for performance analysis.
2018 Aug 05
0
[PATCH net-next 0/6] virtio_net: Add ethtool stat items
On 05/08/2018 4:15 PM, Tariq Toukan wrote:
>
>
> On 25/07/2018 10:59 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com>
>> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 12:40:12 +0300
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:36:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>> From: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
2017 Dec 25
2
[PATCH net-next] virtio_net: Add ethtool stats
On 2017/12/25 3:16, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 13:40:37 +0900
> Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> +
>> +static const struct virtnet_gstats virtnet_gstrings_stats[] = {
>> + { "rx_packets", VIRTNET_NETDEV_STAT(rx_packets) },
>> + { "tx_packets", VIRTNET_NETDEV_STAT(tx_packets) },
>>
2017 Dec 25
2
[PATCH net-next] virtio_net: Add ethtool stats
On 2017/12/25 3:16, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 13:40:37 +0900
> Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>
>> +
>> +static const struct virtnet_gstats virtnet_gstrings_stats[] = {
>> + { "rx_packets", VIRTNET_NETDEV_STAT(rx_packets) },
>> + { "tx_packets", VIRTNET_NETDEV_STAT(tx_packets) },
>>
2018 Jul 24
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/24 2:31, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:20 PM Toshiaki Makita
> <toshiaki.makita1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/07/23 (?) 21:43, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:58 PM Toshiaki Makita
>>> <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at
2018 Jul 24
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/24 2:31, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:20 PM Toshiaki Makita
> <toshiaki.makita1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 18/07/23 (?) 21:43, Tonghao Zhang wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 5:58 PM Toshiaki Makita
>>> <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at
2018 Jul 31
2
[PATCH net-next 2/2] virtio-net: get rid of unnecessary container of rq stats
On 2018/07/31 18:43, Jason Wang wrote:
> We don't maintain tx counters in rx stats any more. There's no need
> for an extra container of rq stats.
>
> Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1
2018 Jul 31
2
[PATCH net-next 2/2] virtio-net: get rid of unnecessary container of rq stats
On 2018/07/31 18:43, Jason Wang wrote:
> We don't maintain tx counters in rx stats any more. There's no need
> for an extra container of rq stats.
>
> Cc: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1
2018 Jul 02
2
[PATCH vhost] vhost_net: Fix too many vring kick on busypoll
On 2018/07/02 15:17, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018?07?02? 12:37, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> On 2018/07/02 11:54, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 2018?07?02? 10:45, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/06/29 18:30, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> On 2018?06?29? 16:09, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>> ...
2018 Jul 02
2
[PATCH vhost] vhost_net: Fix too many vring kick on busypoll
On 2018/07/02 15:17, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018?07?02? 12:37, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> On 2018/07/02 11:54, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 2018?07?02? 10:45, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>
>>>> On 2018/06/29 18:30, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> On 2018?06?29? 16:09, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>> ...
2018 Jul 03
2
[PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] vhost_net: Avoid rx vring kicks during busyloop
On 2018?07?03? 15:31, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> We may run out of avail rx ring descriptor under heavy load but busypoll
> did not detect it so busypoll may have exited prematurely. Avoid this by
> checking rx ring full during busypoll.
Actually, we're checking whether it was empty in fact?
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
2018 Jul 03
2
[PATCH v2 net-next 4/4] vhost_net: Avoid rx vring kicks during busyloop
On 2018?07?03? 15:31, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> We may run out of avail rx ring descriptor under heavy load but busypoll
> did not detect it so busypoll may have exited prematurely. Avoid this by
> checking rx ring full during busypoll.
Actually, we're checking whether it was empty in fact?
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki at lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
2017 Dec 20
4
[PATCH net-next] virtio_net: Add ethtool stats
The main purpose of this patch is adding a way of checking per-queue stats.
It's useful to debug performance problems on multiqueue environment.
$ ethtool -S ens10
NIC statistics:
rx_packets: 4172939
tx_packets: 5855538
rx_bytes: 6317757408
tx_bytes: 8865151846
rx_dropped: 0
rx_length_errors: 0
rx_frame_errors: 0
tx_dropped: 0
tx_fifo_errors: 0
2017 Dec 20
4
[PATCH net-next] virtio_net: Add ethtool stats
The main purpose of this patch is adding a way of checking per-queue stats.
It's useful to debug performance problems on multiqueue environment.
$ ethtool -S ens10
NIC statistics:
rx_packets: 4172939
tx_packets: 5855538
rx_bytes: 6317757408
tx_bytes: 8865151846
rx_dropped: 0
rx_length_errors: 0
rx_frame_errors: 0
tx_dropped: 0
tx_fifo_errors: 0
2018 Jul 23
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> ---
...
>
2018 Jul 23
3
[PATCH net-next v6 3/4] net: vhost: factor out busy polling logic to vhost_net_busy_poll()
On 2018/07/22 3:04, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
>
> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be
> used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch,
> qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com>
> ---
...
>
2018 Jul 02
2
[PATCH vhost] vhost_net: Fix too many vring kick on busypoll
On 2018/07/02 11:54, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018?07?02? 10:45, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> On 2018/06/29 18:30, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 2018?06?29? 16:09, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> ...
>>>> To fix this, poll the work instead of enabling notification when
>>>> busypoll is interrupted by something. IMHO signal_pending() and
2018 Jul 02
2
[PATCH vhost] vhost_net: Fix too many vring kick on busypoll
On 2018/07/02 11:54, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018?07?02? 10:45, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> On 2018/06/29 18:30, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 2018?06?29? 16:09, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> ...
>>>> To fix this, poll the work instead of enabling notification when
>>>> busypoll is interrupted by something. IMHO signal_pending() and
2018 Jul 02
1
[PATCH vhost] vhost_net: Fix too many vring kick on busypoll
On 2018/07/02 16:52, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 2018?07?02? 15:11, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> On 2018/07/02 15:17, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> On 2018?07?02? 12:37, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>> On 2018/07/02 11:54, Jason Wang wrote:
>>>>> On 2018?07?02? 10:45, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>>>