similar to: [PATCH v2 1/2] compiler-gcc.h: add gnu_inline to all inline declarations

On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 10:23 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Perhaps these are simpler as > > #define __inline__ inline > #define __inline inline Currently, there are these uses of inline variants in the kernel $ git grep -w inline | wc -l 68410 $ git grep -w __inline__ | wc -l 503 $ git grep -w __inline | wc -l 57 So it seems it's also reasonable to sed all uses of __inline to

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:54:33PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > It would be great to hear from kernel people if it works adequately for > what you guys want it for :-) Sure, ping me when you have the final version and I'll try to build gcc with it and do some size comparisons. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the

On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 01:54:33PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > It would be great to hear from kernel people if it works adequately for > what you guys want it for :-) Sure, ping me when you have the final version and I'll try to build gcc with it and do some size comparisons. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the

>What happens if you make SPEEX_PREPROCESS_SET_ECHO_SUPPRESS_ACTIVE less >aggressive. Does it end up with too much echo or it just doesn't realise >that it's in double-talk conditions? My impression is that it does not make much difference on the timing to set this parameter less aggressive. Depending on the how loud the near end is talking it may detect double talk but most

Hi Jean-Marc > Can you explain what you mean here by "speech switching" By speech switching I mean the adaption of "gain2" when near-end or far-end is talking. What is important is that the timing is good and that the gain is low/high while far/near-end is talking. By timing I mean that the "gain2" should remain low until all far-end talk is final and that the

Hello, I have some data covering contaminant concentrations in fish over a time period of ~35 years. Each year, multiple samples of fish were taken (with varying sample sizes each year). Ultimately, I want an estimation of the variance between years, and the variance within years + random effects. I used a linear mixed model to estimate these variances, but after reading a number of different

Dear friends, I hope this email finds you all well. This is the dataset I am working with: dput(random_mod12_data2) structure(list(Index = c(1L, 5L, 11L, 3L, 2L, 8L, 9L, 4L), x = c(5, 13, 25, 9, 7, 19, 21, 11), n = c(500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500, 500), r = c(100, 211, 391, 147, 122, 310, 343, 176), ratio = c(0.2, 0.422, 0.782, 0.294, 0.244, 0.62, 0.686, 0.352)), row.names = c(NA, -8L),

Hi, I'm wondering if the Dirac granulepos parsing in liboggz and display in the oggz tools is currently correct, as I'd like to do a release of these soon. A couple of days ago David Schleef mentioned there were some problems. David, is that currently true (ie. since David Flynn's recent updates to support Dirac), and if so could you please explain what the problems are, or point me

Dear Masters, first I'd like to wish u all a great 2011 and happy holydays by now, second (here it come the boring stuff) I have a question to which I hope u would answer: I run a logistic regression by glm(), on the following data type (y1=1,x1=x1); (y2=0,x2=x2);......(yn=0,xn=xn), where the response (y) is abinary outcome on 0,1 amd x is any explanatory variable (continuous or not)

Full_Name: Wolfgang Huber Version: 2.4.0 (2006-06-24 r38403) OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (134.60.107.160) The simple example script below fails in the call to makepdf1 with "Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : object "p" not found" I believe this is a problem in the pdf() function, having to do with the line: lapply(Call, function(x) eval.parent(x, 2))

On 15-Feb-08, at 6:44 AM, ogg.k.ogg.k@googlemail.com wrote: > Well, it doesn't quite work because the second part of the gpos is > an offset, > rather than absolute, and the precision we shed on one, we need to > recover > on the other one, to keep the ability to timestamp events at the > correct > granularity. It would have worked if the second part was absolute

This small patch will make st->Zlast = Zframe, to allow applications access to an estimate of the signal-to-noise level. This used to be in there earlier, but was removed when Zlast was no longer used to compute Pframe. -------------- next part -------------- Index: preprocess.c =================================================================== --- preprocess.c (revision 10007) +++

I am trying to compare Vbert growth curves from several years of fish data. I am following the code provided by: http://www.ncfaculty.net/dogle/fishR/gnrlex/VonBertalanffy/VonBertalanffy.pdf. Specifically the section on VBGM Comparisons between groups. ? This code is pretty cut and dry. I am able to run it perfectly with the "fake" data that is provided. But when I run it with my own

On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 12:50 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:14 PM Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 10:23 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Perhaps these are simpler as > > > > > > #define __inline__ inline > > > #define __inline inline > > > > Currently,

The trailing semicolon is an empty statement that does no operation. Removing it since it doesn't do anything. Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg at kernel.org> --- Hi, After fixing the same thing in drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/, Joe Perches suggested I fix it treewide [0]. Best regards Luis [0]

Hi All We are working on an ARM-based speaker phone application where the speaker and microphone is placed roughly 8 cm from each other (similar to this one: http://www.voipsupply.com/images/CHAT50SPLASH.jpg). We are using Speex AEC and preprocessor to handle the acoustic echo. The AEC typically contribute with ERLE of 15-20 dB which should be as expected from the algorithm. Additionally we need

Hi Peter, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 9:58 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 09:33:35PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Ok, > > > > with Segher's help I've been playing with his patch ontop of bleeding > > edge gcc 9 and here are my observations. Please double-check me for > > booboos so that they can be

From 1.2rc1 source code: preprocess.c: /* FIXME: This VAD is a kludge */ st->speech_prob = Pframe; if (st->vad_enabled) { if (st->speech_prob > st->speech_prob_start || (st->was_speech && st->speech_prob > st->speech_prob_continue)) { st->was_speech=1; return 1; } else { st->was_speech=0; return 0; } } else { return 1; } AND case

Hi The latest SVN trunk for speex has changed the SpeexPreprocessState to an opaque structure, for jolly good software engineering reasons. However, the Analogue AGC (AAGC) feature of iaxclient (in audio_enode.c) relies on some members of this. It uses speech_prob to detect when there is enough speech to consider AAGC and then loudness2 to decide how to adjust the input mixer. We want to use

I have been trying to understand how to get the VAD algorithm working. I sent an input stream of all zeros into the preprocessor but still got a return value of 1 indicating that speech was detected. Is this feature not available with the latest release? I thought at the very least it would detect this as silence and return 0 but that does not seem to be the case. Does anyone have any