similar to: [PATCH RFC 0/2] Packed ring for vhost

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[PATCH RFC 0/2] Packed ring for vhost"

2018 Mar 26
12
[RFC PATCH V2 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event
2018 Mar 26
12
[RFC PATCH V2 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with pmd implement by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html. Minor change was needed for pmd codes to kick virtqueue since it assumes a busy polling backend. Test were done between localhost and guest. Testpmd (rxonly) in guest reports 2.4Mpps. Testpmd (txonly) repots about 2.1Mpps. Notes: The event
2018 May 29
9
[RFC V5 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring layout for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V5 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/5/22/138. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on TX PPS when doing pktgen from guest to host. No ovbious improvement on RX PPS. We can do lots of optimizations on top but for simple
2018 Jul 03
12
[PATCH net-next 0/8] Packed virtqueue for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when
2018 Jul 03
12
[PATCH net-next 0/8] Packed virtqueue for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V6 at https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/6/5/120. Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test virtio-net pmd as well when
2018 May 16
12
[RFC V4 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring layout for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work
2018 May 16
12
[RFC V4 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring layout for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V3 ahttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/25/34. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run for event index. Pktgen reports about 20% improvement on PPS (event index is off). More testing is ongoing. Notes for tester: - Start from this version, vhost need qemu co-operation to work
2018 Apr 23
11
[RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -
2018 Apr 23
11
[RFC V3 PATCH 0/8] Packed ring for vhost
Hi all: This RFC implement packed ring layout. The code were tested with Tiwei's RFC V2 a thttps://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/1/48. Some fixups and tweaks were needed on top of Tiwei's code to make it run. TCP stream and pktgen does not show obvious difference compared with split ring. Changes from V2: - do not use & in checking desc_event_flags - off should be most significant bit -
2018 Feb 27
1
[PATCH RFC 2/2] vhost: packed ring support
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:37:09AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: [...] > +static void set_desc_used(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, > + struct vring_desc_packed *desc, bool wrap_counter) > +{ > + __virtio16 flags = desc->flags; > + > + if (wrap_counter) { > + desc->flags |= cpu_to_vhost16(vq, DESC_AVAIL); > + desc->flags |= cpu_to_vhost16(vq, DESC_USED); > + } else
2018 Jul 16
11
[PATCH net-next V2 0/8] Packed virtqueue support for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test
2018 Jul 16
11
[PATCH net-next V2 0/8] Packed virtqueue support for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues. The code were tested with Tiwei's guest driver series at https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/942297/ Pktgen test for both RX and TX does not show obvious difference with split virtqueues. The main bottleneck is the guest Linux driver, since it can not stress vhost for a 100% CPU utilization. A full TCP benchmark is ongoing. Will test
2019 Jul 17
17
[PATCH V3 00/15] Packed virtqueue support for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues which were described at [1]. In this version we try to address the performance regression saw by V2. The root cause is packed virtqueue need more times of userspace memory accesssing which turns out to be very expensive. Thanks to the help of 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address"), such overhead cold be
2019 Jul 17
17
[PATCH V3 00/15] Packed virtqueue support for vhost
Hi all: This series implements packed virtqueues which were described at [1]. In this version we try to address the performance regression saw by V2. The root cause is packed virtqueue need more times of userspace memory accesssing which turns out to be very expensive. Thanks to the help of 7f466032dc9e ("vhost: access vq metadata through kernel virtual address"), such overhead cold be
2018 Mar 30
1
[RFC PATCH V2 8/8] vhost: event suppression for packed ring
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:38:53AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch introduces basic support for event suppression aka driver > and device area. Compile tested only. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- [...] > + > +static bool vhost_notify_packed(struct vhost_dev *dev, > + struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > +{ > + __virtio16
2018 Feb 14
0
[PATCH RFC 2/2] vhost: packed ring support
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 14 +- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 351 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 6 +- 3 files changed, 343 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c index c613d2e..65b27c9 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c @@
2020 Jun 08
14
[PATCH RFC v6 00/11] vhost: ring format independence
This adds infrastructure required for supporting multiple ring formats. The idea is as follows: we convert descriptors to an independent format first, and process that converting to iov later. Used ring is similar: we fetch into an independent struct first, convert that to IOV later. The point is that we have a tight loop that fetches descriptors, which is good for cache utilization. This will
2018 May 30
2
[RFC V5 PATCH 8/8] vhost: event suppression for packed ring
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:10:30AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch introduces basic support for event suppression aka driver > and device area. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 191 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 10 +- >
2018 May 30
2
[RFC V5 PATCH 8/8] vhost: event suppression for packed ring
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:10:30AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch introduces basic support for event suppression aka driver > and device area. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 191 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 10 +- >
2020 Jun 02
21
[PATCH RFC 00/13] vhost: format independence
We let the specifics of the ring format seep through to vhost API callers - mostly because there was only one format so it was hard to imagine what an independent API would look like. Now that there's an alternative in form of the packed ring, it's easier to see the issues, and fixing them is perhaps the cleanest way to add support for more formats. This patchset does this by indtroducing