Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[PATCH net-next 10/12] tools/virtio: more stubs to fix tools build"
2018 Sep 07
0
[PATCH] virtio: add unlikely() to WARN_ON_ONCE()
The condition to test is unlikely() to be true. Add the hint.
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa at huawei.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com>
Cc: Virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
---
tools/virtio/linux/kernel.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
2018 Dec 10
1
[PATCH net 4/4] vhost: log dirty page correctly
Hi Jason,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on net/master]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Wang/Fix-various-issue-of-vhost/20181210-223236
config: i386-randconfig-x072-201849 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-1) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All
2020 Jul 28
0
[vhost:vhost 38/45] include/linux/vdpa.h:43:21: error: expected ':', ',', ';', '}' or '__attribute__' before '.' token
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git vhost
head: 84d40e4b4bc64456abf5ef5663871053b40e84ac
commit: fee8fe6bd8ccacd27e963b71b4f943be3721779e [38/45] vdpa: make sure set_features in invoked for legacy
config: m68k-randconfig-r022-20200727 (attached as .config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget
2017 Jul 11
0
[regression drm/noveau] suspend to ram -> BOOM: exception RIP: drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+335
Some details that may be useful in analysis of the bug:
1. lspci -nn -d 10de:
2. What displays, if any, you have plugged into the NVIDIA board when
this happens?
3. Any boot parameters, esp relating to ACPI, PM, or related?
Cheers,
-ilia
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I met $subject in master-rt post drm merge, but
2017 Jul 11
2
[regression drm/noveau] suspend to ram -> BOOM: exception RIP: drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos+335
Greetings,
I met $subject in master-rt post drm merge, but taking the config
(attached) to virgin v4.12-10624-g9967468c0a10, it's reproducible.
KERNEL: vmlinux-4.12.0.g9967468-preempt.gz
DUMPFILE: vmcore
CPUS: 8
DATE: Tue Jul 11 18:55:28 2017
UPTIME: 00:02:03
LOAD AVERAGE: 3.43, 1.39, 0.52
TASKS: 467
NODENAME: homer
RELEASE:
2006 May 15
3
Eicon Diva - problems building new v3 melware driver
Hi Armin!
I have problems on debian sarge with standard 2.6.8-2-386 kernel.
I've installed the packages:
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2
kernel-headers-2.6.8-2-386
kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386
kernel-kbuild-2.6-3
kernel-source-2.6.8
Then I unpacked the kernel sources into /usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.8 and
made a symlink from /usr/src/linux --> kernel-source-2.6.8
Then I entered
2012 Nov 06
0
[ablock84-btrfs:btrfs-far 19/20] fs/far/far-path.c:42:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'IS_ERR'
tree: git://github.com/ablock84/linux-btrfs.git btrfs-far
head: f9a5bb450a8cc7aa5fd4f11d0306b3f48cf2771d
commit: 29aefeaaf482ab396ff53c2bbf5c35ce237b91c0 [19/20] fs: add libfarstream support
config: make ARCH=s390 allmodconfig
All error/warnings:
In file included from include/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:4:0,
from arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:4,
2006 Feb 26
0
Unable to build linux-2.6-xen.hg
Greetings,
I''m unable to build current (Sun Feb 26 18:14:23 UTC 2006)
linux-2.6-xen.hg on Debian sarge AMD64 host.
Following error messgaes appears:
-- CUT HERE --
sunfire:/usr/src/xen-subarch/linux-2.6-xen.hg# make
CHK include/linux/version.h
SPLIT include/linux/autoconf.h -> include/config/*
CC arch/x86_64/kernel/asm-offsets.s
In file included from
2018 Jan 27
0
Thread-local-storage memory layout
Hi
I am writing a freestanding statically linked x86_64 kernel. And now I
want to load and use thread-local storage. As I have a freestanding
binary I can't use libc/Linux kernel thread-local mechanism and need
to implement initialization code by myself.
I am trying to find a clear explanation of what is the memory layout
for x86 TLS but can't find anything useful. Maybe LLVM developers
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] no paravirt for X86_VOYAGER or X86_VISWS
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Since Voyager and Visual WS already define ARCH_SETUP,
it looks like PARAVIRT shouldn't be offered for them.
In file included from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:63:
include/asm-i386/mach-visws/setup_arch.h:8:1: warning: "ARCH_SETUP" redefined
In file included from include/asm/msr.h:5,
from include/asm/processor.h:17,
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] no paravirt for X86_VOYAGER or X86_VISWS
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Since Voyager and Visual WS already define ARCH_SETUP,
it looks like PARAVIRT shouldn't be offered for them.
In file included from arch/i386/kernel/setup.c:63:
include/asm-i386/mach-visws/setup_arch.h:8:1: warning: "ARCH_SETUP" redefined
In file included from include/asm/msr.h:5,
from include/asm/processor.h:17,
2019 Sep 11
0
[vhost:linux-next 16/17] include/linux/page_reporting.h:9:34: note: in expansion of macro 'pageblock_order'
tree: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next
head: 39c226b6b576b23d6d558331e6895f02b0892555
commit: 990055c63121520ad29deca72b1167b392563ddd [16/17] virtio-balloon: Add support for providing unused page reports to host
config: riscv-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget
2006 Mar 06
2
Problem compiling a custom kernel for xen-3.0
Hello,
I am trying to run xen-3.0 in some of my dell servers. I have tried the
binary distribution of xen, but it doesn''t boot in my test system (a
dell poweredge 750) because a module driver problem (I get an error
message during booting saying it doesn''t load a NFS root filesystem).
So I am trying to compile a custom kernel. So I have downloaded linux
source 2.6.12. I am
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] exec-shield style vdso move.
So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work?
Reposted below.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH] exec-shield style vdso move.
So, is everyone happy with this smerge of Ingo and Gerd's work?
Reposted below.
Thanks,
Rusty.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: FW: argh]]
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
2007 Jun 06
0
[PATCH UPDATE] xen: use iret directly where possible
[ Expand, correct and clarify comments; minor code change. ]
Most of the time we can simply use the iret instruction to exit the
kernel, rather than having to use the iret hypercall - the only
exception is if we're returning into vm86 mode, or from delivering an
NMI (which we don't support yet).
When running native, iret has the behaviour of testing for a pending
interrupt atomically
2007 Jun 06
0
[PATCH UPDATE] xen: use iret directly where possible
[ Expand, correct and clarify comments; minor code change. ]
Most of the time we can simply use the iret instruction to exit the
kernel, rather than having to use the iret hypercall - the only
exception is if we're returning into vm86 mode, or from delivering an
NMI (which we don't support yet).
When running native, iret has the behaviour of testing for a pending
interrupt atomically
2005 Oct 06
3
Xen unstable/SuSE 9.3 install issue
Hi,
I have successfully installed Xen unstable binary on SuSE 9.3. I am trying
to do a source install and I got the following error. Will be glad for any
help or guidance.
In file included from include/asm-xen/asm/processor.h:18,
from include/asm/thread_info.h:17,
from include/linux/thread_info.h:21,
from include/linux/spinlock.h:12,
from include/linux/capability.h:45,
from
2007 Jun 04
1
[PATCH] xen: use iret directly where possible
xen: use iret directly where possible
Most of the time we can simply use the iret instruction to exit the
kernel, rather than having to use the iret hypercall - the only
exception is if we're returning into vm86 mode, or from delivering an
NMI (which we don't support yet).
When running native, iret has the behaviour of testing for a pending
interrupt atomically with re-enabling
2007 Jun 04
1
[PATCH] xen: use iret directly where possible
xen: use iret directly where possible
Most of the time we can simply use the iret instruction to exit the
kernel, rather than having to use the iret hypercall - the only
exception is if we're returning into vm86 mode, or from delivering an
NMI (which we don't support yet).
When running native, iret has the behaviour of testing for a pending
interrupt atomically with re-enabling