similar to: PCIe ordering and new VIRTIO packed ring format.

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > > > The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented > > by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html > > Minor changes

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > > > The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented > > by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html > > Minor changes

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > > >

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > > >

On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. >>> >>> The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented >>> by Jens at

On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented > by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html > Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. > > TODO: > - Refinements and bug

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:05:07AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > >

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 02:34:56PM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com] > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 4:22 PM > > To: Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal at mellanox.com> > > Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > > Subject: Re: packed ring

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 02:34:56PM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com] > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 4:22 PM > > To: Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal at mellanox.com> > > Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > > Subject: Re: packed ring

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:16:38AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:05:07AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On

On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:16:38AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:05:07AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:54:52AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 2018?04?23? 17:29, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 01:42:14PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > On

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Jun Koi <junkoi2004 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I found a mismatch between assembler & disassembler of X86: I assembled an > instruction, then disassembled the output, but the result is not the same > as the first original code: "add qword ptr [205163983024656], 1" vs " add > qword ptr [1985229328], 1" > >

Hi, I found a mismatch between assembler & disassembler of X86: I assembled an instruction, then disassembled the output, but the result is not the same as the first original code: "add qword ptr [205163983024656], 1" vs " add qword ptr [1985229328], 1" Anybody knows what is wrong? Thanks. $ echo "ADD QWORD PTR [0xba9876543210], 0x1"|llvm-mc -assemble

If you do this whats the point of the id? Just use descriptor offset like virtio 0 did. On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 09:05:01AM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote: > My point was that if the driver is not required to change the IDs, > it can initialized the ID's in all the descriptors when the ring is created > and never write the ID field again. > > A simple allocator for the IDs can

If you do this whats the point of the id? Just use descriptor offset like virtio 0 did. On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 09:05:01AM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote: > My point was that if the driver is not required to change the IDs, > it can initialized the ID's in all the descriptors when the ring is created > and never write the ID field again. > > A simple allocator for the IDs can

On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 06:16:44AM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org > > > [mailto:virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf > > > Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > > > > > This is an update from v2 version. > >> ... > > >

On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 06:16:44AM +0000, Ilya Lesokhin wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org > > > [mailto:virtualization-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf > > > Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > > > > > This is an update from v2 version. > >> ... > > >

> > > >>>>> On 10/16/2016 11:16 PM, Pierre Jaury wrote: > > > >>>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I am using a dict proxy for my sieve extdata plugin to access some > > > >>>>>> fields from an SQLite database (autoreply text and other > > >

Hello, I am using a dict proxy for my sieve extdata plugin to access some fields from an SQLite database (autoreply text and other database-configured items). All tests are performed against version 2.2.25. $ dovecot --version 2.2.25 (7be1766) My configuration looks like: dict { sieve = sqlite:/etc/dovecot/pigeonhole-sieve.dict } [...] sieve_extdata_dict_uri = proxy::sieve I

Hi! This does sound like a bug, we'll have look. Aki On 17.10.2016 01:26, Pierre Jaury wrote: > I dived a little bit further into the rabbit hole, up to the point where > debugging has become unpracticle but I still haven't found the root > cause for sure. > > I read most of the code for "p_strdup" based on datastack memory pools > (which are used for