similar to: [PATCH] virtio/s390: fixup for implement PM operations for virtio_ccw

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[PATCH] virtio/s390: fixup for implement PM operations for virtio_ccw"

2018 Feb 12
2
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
Michael, Conny, it seems that this patch did not make it into 4.16-rc1. On 12/18/2017 05:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> > > Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire > up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding > the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that > has to be done
2018 Feb 12
2
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
Michael, Conny, it seems that this patch did not make it into 4.16-rc1. On 12/18/2017 05:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> > > Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire > up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding > the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that > has to be done
2017 Dec 18
2
[PULL v2 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit 20677394b78ed4c4baa09c9a1bcfdf24d2b09fe4: Merge branch 'vhost' into vhost-next (2017-12-18 08:21:38 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171218-v2 for you to fetch changes up to 352d303fa99330e5d197afcc28b5270734e5c541: virtio/s390: implement PM
2017 Dec 18
2
[PULL v2 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit 20677394b78ed4c4baa09c9a1bcfdf24d2b09fe4: Merge branch 'vhost' into vhost-next (2017-12-18 08:21:38 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171218-v2 for you to fetch changes up to 352d303fa99330e5d197afcc28b5270734e5c541: virtio/s390: implement PM
2020 May 26
3
[PATCH] s390/virtio: remove unused pm callbacks
Support for hibernation on s390 has been recently been removed with commit 394216275c7d ("s390: remove broken hibernate / power management support"), no need to keep unused code around. Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> --- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 26 -------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-) diff --git
2020 May 26
3
[PATCH] s390/virtio: remove unused pm callbacks
Support for hibernation on s390 has been recently been removed with commit 394216275c7d ("s390: remove broken hibernate / power management support"), no need to keep unused code around. Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> --- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 26 -------------------------- 1 file changed, 26 deletions(-) diff --git
2017 Dec 18
0
[PATCH] virtio/s390: fixup for implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
On 18.12.2017 09:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > We need to disable the pm callbacks if CONFIG_PM is not set. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> > --- > Cornelia, you might want to squash this into the original commit. > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git
2017 Dec 07
3
[PATCH 0/1] suspend/resume for virtio_ccw
With this patch I can suspend/resume a KVM guest. [root at test ~]# cd /sys/power/ [root at test power]# echo test_resume > disk [root at test power]# lscss Device Subchan. DevType CU Type Use PIM PAM POM CHPIDs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0.0003 0.0.0000 0000/00 3832/03 yes 80 80 ff 00000000 00000000 0.0.0000 0.0.0001
2017 Dec 07
3
[PATCH 0/1] suspend/resume for virtio_ccw
With this patch I can suspend/resume a KVM guest. [root at test ~]# cd /sys/power/ [root at test power]# echo test_resume > disk [root at test power]# lscss Device Subchan. DevType CU Type Use PIM PAM POM CHPIDs ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0.0003 0.0.0000 0000/00 3832/03 yes 80 80 ff 00000000 00000000 0.0.0000 0.0.0001
2017 Dec 14
2
[PULL 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit e073f74a5a39c6dc45f28a5006c21aa94490d9b8: Merge branch 'this' into vhost (2017-12-07 18:39:24 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171214 for you to fetch changes up to 619b4b0ba832144d4be899640a2047f9675df849: virtio/s390: implement PM operations for
2017 Dec 14
2
[PULL 0/1] s390/virtio update
The following changes since commit e073f74a5a39c6dc45f28a5006c21aa94490d9b8: Merge branch 'this' into vhost (2017-12-07 18:39:24 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-s390-20171214 for you to fetch changes up to 619b4b0ba832144d4be899640a2047f9675df849: virtio/s390: implement PM operations for
2017 Dec 18
0
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that has to be done in virtio_ccw itself is to re-set the virtio revision. Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger
2018 Feb 14
0
[PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:52:00 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > Michael, Conny, > it seems that this patch did not make it into 4.16-rc1. Michael, please let me know what you plan to do with the virtio-s390-20171218-v2 pull request. > > > > On 12/18/2017 05:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger
2017 Dec 07
0
[PATCH 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
Suspend/Resume to/from disk currently fails. Let us wire up the necessary callbacks. This is mostly just forwarding the requests to the virtio drivers. The only thing that has to be done in virtio_ccw itself is to re-set the virtio revision. Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> ---
2020 Jun 04
0
[PATCH] s390/virtio: remove unused pm callbacks
On Tue, 26 May 2020 11:36:29 +0200 Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > Support for hibernation on s390 has been recently been removed with > commit 394216275c7d ("s390: remove broken hibernate / power management > support"), no need to keep unused code around. > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic
2020 Jun 05
1
[PATCH] s390/virtio: remove unused pm callbacks
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 23:44:21 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2020 11:36:29 +0200 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > Support for hibernation on s390 has been recently been removed with s/been recently been removed/recently been removed/ > > commit 394216275c7d ("s390: remove broken hibernate / power
2019 May 27
3
[PATCH v2 8/8] virtio/s390: make airq summary indicators DMA
On Thu, 23 May 2019 18:22:09 +0200 Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > > Hypervisor needs to interact with the summary indicators, so these > need to be DMA memory as well (at least for protected virtualization > guests). > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > --- >
2019 May 27
3
[PATCH v2 8/8] virtio/s390: make airq summary indicators DMA
On Thu, 23 May 2019 18:22:09 +0200 Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > > Hypervisor needs to interact with the summary indicators, so these > need to be DMA memory as well (at least for protected virtualization > guests). > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > --- >
2019 Jun 03
2
[PATCH v3 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:52 +0200 Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > > As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area > for any communication with the hypervisor. "we need to use the dma area within the common I/O layer for any communication with the hypervisor. Note that we do not
2019 Jun 03
2
[PATCH v3 3/8] s390/cio: add basic protected virtualization support
On Wed, 29 May 2019 14:26:52 +0200 Michael Mueller <mimu at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > From: Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> > > As virtio-ccw devices are channel devices, we need to use the dma area > for any communication with the hypervisor. "we need to use the dma area within the common I/O layer for any communication with the hypervisor. Note that we do not