similar to: [PATCHv2] virtio_mmio: fix devm cleanup

Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe path balanced a devm_ioremap() with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends up corrupting the devm datastructures, and results in the following boot failure on arm64 under QEMU 2.9.0: [ 3.450397] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.453822] Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (00000000c05b4844) [ 3.460534] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1

Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe path balanced a devm_ioremap() with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends up corrupting the devm datastructures, and results in the following boot failure on arm64 under QEMU 2.9.0: [ 3.450397] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.453822] Trying to vfree() nonexistent vm area (00000000c05b4844) [ 3.460534] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:02:23PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:45:50 +0000 > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote: > > > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe/remove paths balanced a > > devm_ioremap() with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends > > up corrupting the devm datastructures, and results in the following

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:02:23PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:45:50 +0000 > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote: > > > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe/remove paths balanced a > > devm_ioremap() with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends > > up corrupting the devm datastructures, and results in the following

2017-12-12 21:45 GMT+08:00 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>: > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe/remove paths balanced a > devm_ioremap() with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends > up corrupting the devm datastructures, and results in the following > boot-time splat on arm64 under QEMU 2.9.0: > > [ 3.450397] ------------[ cut here

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:26:24PM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > 2017-12-12 21:45 GMT+08:00 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>: > Hi Mark, Hi, > thanks your patch, I dig into these three devm_xxx funciton, > all of them represented by a struct devres as following, > > struct devres_node { > struct list_head entry; > dr_release_t

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:26:24PM +0800, weiping zhang wrote: > 2017-12-12 21:45 GMT+08:00 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>: > Hi Mark, Hi, > thanks your patch, I dig into these three devm_xxx funciton, > all of them represented by a struct devres as following, > > struct devres_node { > struct list_head entry; > dr_release_t

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:53:02 +0000 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote: > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe path balanced a devm_ioremap() > with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends up corrupting > the devm datastructures, and results in the following boot failure on > arm64 under QEMU 2.9.0: > > [ 3.450397] ------------[ cut here

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:09:52PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:53:02 +0000 > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote: > > > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe path balanced a devm_ioremap() > > with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends up corrupting > > the devm datastructures, and results in the following boot

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 02:09:52PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 12:53:02 +0000 > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote: > > > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe path balanced a devm_ioremap() > > with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends up corrupting > > the devm datastructures, and results in the following boot

On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 02:34:14PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:02:23PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:45:50 +0000 > > Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote: > > > > > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe/remove paths balanced a > > > devm_ioremap() with an iounmap() rather than its devm

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:45:50 +0000 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com> wrote: > Recent rework of the virtio_mmio probe/remove paths balanced a > devm_ioremap() with an iounmap() rather than its devm variant. This ends > up corrupting the devm datastructures, and results in the following > boot-time splat on arm64 under QEMU 2.9.0: > > [ 3.450397] ------------[ cut

cleanup all resource allocated by virtio_mmio_probe. Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c index 74dc717..3fd0e66 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c +++

cleanup all resource allocated by virtio_mmio_probe. Signed-off-by: weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c index 74dc717..3fd0e66 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c +++

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 19:57:10 +0800 weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> wrote: > As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > /* > * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the > * reference initialized in this function instead. > */ > > Normal we do cleanup for

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 19:57:10 +0800 weiping zhang <zhangweiping at didichuxing.com> wrote: > As mentioned at drivers/base/core.c: > /* > * NOTE: _Never_ directly free @dev after calling this function, even > * if it returned an error! Always use put_device() to give up the > * reference initialized in this function instead. > */ > > Normal we do cleanup for

I think not. In virtio_pci_common, vp_dev is allocated by kzalloc so a kfree is needed. Here vm_dev is allocated by devm_kmalloc which is "automatically freed on driver detach" from the comment (drivers/base/devres.c:769). On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2016?11?24? 08:31, Yuan Liu wrote: > >> From: Yuan Liu

I think not. In virtio_pci_common, vp_dev is allocated by kzalloc so a kfree is needed. Here vm_dev is allocated by devm_kmalloc which is "automatically freed on driver detach" from the comment (drivers/base/devres.c:769). On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On 2016?11?24? 08:31, Yuan Liu wrote: > >> From: Yuan Liu

From: Yuan Liu <liuyuan at google.com> Fix a warning thrown from virtio_mmio_remove(): Device 'virtio0' does not have a release() function The fix is according to virtio_pci_probe() of drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c Signed-off-by: Yuan Liu <liuyuan at google.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git

From: Yuan Liu <liuyuan at google.com> Fix a warning thrown from virtio_mmio_remove(): Device 'virtio0' does not have a release() function The fix is according to virtio_pci_probe() of drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c Signed-off-by: Yuan Liu <liuyuan at google.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git