similar to: [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/xen: support booting PVH guest via standard boot path

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:27:36PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > The x86_hyper pointer is only used for checking whether a virtual > device is supporting the hypervisor the system is running on. > > Use an enum for that purpose instead and drop the x86_hyper pointer. > > Cc: kys at microsoft.com > Cc: haiyangz at microsoft.com > Cc: sthemmin at microsoft.com > Cc:

On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 02:27:36PM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > The x86_hyper pointer is only used for checking whether a virtual > device is supporting the hypervisor the system is running on. > > Use an enum for that purpose instead and drop the x86_hyper pointer. > > Cc: kys at microsoft.com > Cc: haiyangz at microsoft.com > Cc: sthemmin at microsoft.com > Cc:

Please consider this patch to allow x2apic without IR support when running on VMware platform. Tested on top of 3.8-rc3. Thanks, Alok -- Allow x2apic without IR on VMware platform. From: Alok N Kataria <akataria at vmware.com> This patch updates x2apic initializaition code to allow x2apic on VMware platform even without interrupt remapping support. The hypervisor_x2apic_available hook

Please consider this patch to allow x2apic without IR support when running on VMware platform. Tested on top of 3.8-rc3. Thanks, Alok -- Allow x2apic without IR on VMware platform. From: Alok N Kataria <akataria at vmware.com> This patch updates x2apic initializaition code to allow x2apic on VMware platform even without interrupt remapping support. The hypervisor_x2apic_available hook

The x86_hyper pointer is only used for checking whether a virtual device is supporting the hypervisor the system is running on. Use an enum for that purpose instead and drop the x86_hyper pointer. Cc: kys at microsoft.com Cc: haiyangz at microsoft.com Cc: sthemmin at microsoft.com Cc: akataria at vmware.com Cc: pbonzini at redhat.com Cc: rkrcmar at redhat.com Cc: boris.ostrovsky at oracle.com

4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> commit 03b2a320b19f1424e9ac9c21696be9c60b6d0d93 upstream. The x86_hyper pointer is only used for checking whether a virtual device is supporting the hypervisor the system is running on. Use an enum for that purpose instead and drop the x86_hyper

4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com> commit f72e38e8ec8869ac0ba5a75d7d2f897d98a1454e upstream. Instead of x86_hyper being either NULL on bare metal or a pointer to a struct hypervisor_x86 in case of the kernel running as a guest merge the struct into x86_platform and x86_init. This will

We try to handle the hypervisor compatibility mode by detecting hypervisor through a specific order. This is not robust, since hypervisors may implement each others features. This patch tries to handle this situation by always choosing the last one in the CPUID leaves. This is done by letting .detect() returns a priority instead of true/false and just re-using the CPUID leaf where the signature

We try to handle the hypervisor compatibility mode by detecting hypervisor through a specific order. This is not robust, since hypervisors may implement each others features. This patch tries to handle this situation by always choosing the last one in the CPUID leaves. This is done by letting .detect() returns a priority instead of true/false and just re-using the CPUID leaf where the signature

We try to handle the hypervisor compatibility mode by detecting hypervisor through a specific order. This is not robust, since hypervisors may implement each others features. This patch tries to handle this situation by always choosing the last one in the CPUID leaves. This is done by letting .detect() returns a priority instead of true/false and just re-using the CPUID leaf where the signature

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a

Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling decisions. This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily pin a (virtual) cpu to a