similar to: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: copy virtio on balloon_compaction.c

On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 03:42:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Changes to mm/balloon_compaction.c can easily break virtio, and virtio > is the only user of that interface. Add a line to MAINTAINERS so > whoever changes that file remembers to copy us. > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1

Jason doesn't really have the time to review blk/scsi patches. Paolo and Setfan agreed to help out. Thanks guys! Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 95a5ebecd04f..8326d19c1681 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -16247,7 +16247,7 @@ F: drivers/char/virtio_console.c F: include/linux/virtio_console.h F:

Jason doesn't really have the time to review blk/scsi patches. Paolo and Setfan agreed to help out. Thanks guys! Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 95a5ebecd04f..8326d19c1681 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -16247,7 +16247,7 @@ F: drivers/char/virtio_console.c F: include/linux/virtio_console.h F:

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:45 AM, Gonglei (Arei) Wrote: < > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c < > b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c < > > new file mode 100644 < > > index 0000000..c0854a1 < > > --- /dev/null < > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c < > > @@ -0,0 +1,474 @@ < >

On Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:45 AM, Gonglei (Arei) Wrote: < > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c < > b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c < > > new file mode 100644 < > > index 0000000..c0854a1 < > > --- /dev/null < > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c < > > @@ -0,0 +1,474 @@ < >

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:56:04AM +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for your feedback firstly! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 11:33 AM > > To: Gonglei (Arei) > >

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:56:04AM +0000, Gonglei (Arei) wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for your feedback firstly! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2016 11:33 AM > > To: Gonglei (Arei) > >

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 01:37:44 +0000 "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:08:23 +0800 > > Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > +static int virtcrypto_update_status(struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto) > > > +{ > > > + u32 status; > > > + int err; > > > + >

On Tue, 29 Nov 2016 01:37:44 +0000 "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:08:23 +0800 > > Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> wrote: > > > > > +static int virtcrypto_update_status(struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto) > > > +{ > > > + u32 status; > > > + int err; > > > + >

I found some warnings reported by sparse in the virtio code when I checked virtio-crypto's driver stuff. Let's fix them. Gonglei (2): virtio_pci_modern: fix complaint by sparse virtio_ring: fix complaint by sparse drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1

I found some warnings reported by sparse in the virtio code when I checked virtio-crypto's driver stuff. Let's fix them. Gonglei (2): virtio_pci_modern: fix complaint by sparse virtio_ring: fix complaint by sparse drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.1

Hi Gonglei. On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:37:08PM +0800, Gonglei wrote: > >> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h:44:44: > error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_data' > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).proc_id) > ^ > Let's include

Hi Gonglei. On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 12:37:08PM +0800, Gonglei wrote: > >> arch/sparc/include/asm/topology_64.h:44:44: > error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_data' > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > #define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).proc_id) > ^ > Let's include

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:08:23 +0800 Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> wrote: > +static int virtcrypto_update_status(struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto) > +{ > + u32 status; > + int err; > + > + virtio_cread(vcrypto->vdev, > + struct virtio_crypto_config, status, &status); > + > + /* Ignore unknown (future) status bits */ > + status &=

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 20:08:23 +0800 Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> wrote: > +static int virtcrypto_update_status(struct virtio_crypto *vcrypto) > +{ > + u32 status; > + int err; > + > + virtio_cread(vcrypto->vdev, > + struct virtio_crypto_config, status, &status); > + > + /* Ignore unknown (future) status bits */ > + status &=

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 04:10:22PM +0800, Gonglei wrote: > Virtio modern devices are always little edian, let's introduce > the LE functions for read/write configuration space for > virtio modern devices, which avoid complaint by Sparse when > we use the virtio_creaed/virtio_cwrite in VIRTIO_1 devices. > > Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> > ---

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 04:10:22PM +0800, Gonglei wrote: > Virtio modern devices are always little edian, let's introduce > the LE functions for read/write configuration space for > virtio modern devices, which avoid complaint by Sparse when > we use the virtio_creaed/virtio_cwrite in VIRTIO_1 devices. > > Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> > ---

Some hardware accelerators (like intel aseni or the s390 cpacf functions) have lower priorities than virtio crypto, and those drivers are faster than the same in the host via virtio. So let's lower the priority of virtio-crypto's algorithm, make it's higher than sofeware implimentations but lower than the hardware ones. Suggested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at

Some hardware accelerators (like intel aseni or the s390 cpacf functions) have lower priorities than virtio crypto, and those drivers are faster than the same in the host via virtio. So let's lower the priority of virtio-crypto's algorithm, make it's higher than sofeware implimentations but lower than the hardware ones. Suggested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at

From: Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> In order to support to assign a boot order for vhost-scsi device, we should get the tpgt for user level (such as Qemu). and at present, we only support the minimum tpgt can boot. Signed-off-by: Gonglei <arei.gonglei at huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Bo Su <subo7 at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 41