similar to: [PATCH 3/6] virtio: allow extra context per descriptor

This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 8 +- 2 files changed, 546 insertions(+), 263 deletions(-)

This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 8 +- 2 files changed, 546 insertions(+), 263 deletions(-)

On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented > by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html > Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. > > TODO: > - Refinements and bug

On 2018?04?01? 22:12, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Hello everyone, > > This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. > > The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented > by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html > Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. > > TODO: > - Refinements and bug

Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 699 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 8 +- 2 files changed, 618 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index eb30f3e09a47..393778a2f809 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:03:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On 2018?02?23? 19:18, Tiwei Bie wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 699 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > > include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 8 +- > > 2 files changed, 618 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) > >

On 2018?05?22? 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >

On 2018?05?22? 16:16, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 801 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> I'd rather have a patch just renaming split functions, then add all packed stuff

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 10:27:08AM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: > This commit introduces the support for creating packed ring. > All split ring specific functions are added _split suffix. > Some necessary stubs for packed ring are also added. > > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> I'd rather have a patch just renaming split functions, then add all packed stuff

On 2018?02?23? 19:18, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 699 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 8 +- > 2 files changed, 618 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > index

On 2018?02?23? 19:18, Tiwei Bie wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie at intel.com> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 699 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > include/linux/virtio_ring.h | 8 +- > 2 files changed, 618 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > index

virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't always the case. For example, this never works on Xen guests, and it is likely to fail if a physical "virtio" device ever ends up behind an IOMMU or swiotlb. The immediate use case for me is

Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. TODO: - Refinements and bug fixes; - Split into small patches; - Test indirect descriptor support; - Test/fix event

Hello everyone, This RFC implements packed ring support for virtio driver. The code was tested with DPDK vhost (testpmd/vhost-PMD) implemented by Jens at http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-January/089417.html Minor changes are needed for the vhost code, e.g. to kick the guest. TODO: - Refinements and bug fixes; - Split into small patches; - Test indirect descriptor support; - Test/fix event

virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't always the case. For example, this never works on Xen guests, and it is likely to fail if a physical "virtio" device ever ends up behind an IOMMU or swiotlb. The immediate use case for me is

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:46:36PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) > physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA > addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't > always the case. For example, this never works on Xen guests, and > it is likely to fail if a physical

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:46:36PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) > physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA > addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't > always the case. For example, this never works on Xen guests, and > it is likely to fail if a physical

On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 14:43:42 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 7:59?PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > virtqueue_add_split() only supports virtual addresses, dma is completed > > in virtqueue_add_split(). > > > > In some scenarios (such as the AF_XDP scenario), the memory is allocated >

virtio_ring currently sends the device (usually a hypervisor) physical addresses of its I/O buffers. This is okay when DMA addresses and physical addresses are the same thing, but this isn't always the case. For example, this never works on Xen guests, and it is likely to fail if a physical "virtio" device ever ends up behind an IOMMU or swiotlb. The immediate use case for me is