similar to: panic in virtio console startup in v4.11-rc1

Hi Ben, A kernel bug report was opened against Ubuntu [0]. After a kernel bisect, it was found that reverting the following commit resolved this bug: commit da2ba564a6dcf46df4f828624ff55531ff11d5b0 Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Date: Thu Apr 6 10:35:26 2017 +1000 drm/nouveau: initial support (display-only) for GP107 The regression was introduced as of v4.11-rc7. I

Hi Aurélien, is there some documentation around where I can read about that? Where can I find the information, that I need Kernel 4.11 or above to get DFS with SMB2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0 and above working? Regards, Christian Am 12.06.2017 um 12:46 schrieb Aurélien Aptel: > Hi Christian, > > Christian Garling via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >> a few days ago we

Hi, The HP ZBook 15 G3 laptop builtin display (eDP-1) does not work correctly with v4.11-11413-g2868b25. When booting the laptop, the resolution seems to be limited to 1024x768, and gnome-session segfaults. Up to 4.11 the display works just fine in 1920x1080 mode. I'm seeing this in the kernel logs: nouveau 0000:01:00.0: eDP-1: EDID is invalid: [00] BAD 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 ff

Hello, My team is in search of a way to mount SMB3/CIFS shares from a Linux client with encryption enabled (and with reasonable performance). After some research, it appears that the kernel CIFS client (mount.cifs) lacks encryption support, while the Samba client library (libsmbclient) doesn't offer mount functionality. Looking at the recent commit "examples: Add smb2mount"

On 05/15/2017 01:10 AM, Tommi Rantala wrote: > Hi, Hey Tommi, Thanks for bisecting this. It's rather unexpected that you should be seeing problems here, but, the commit makes sense for it at least. Are you able to get me new kernel logs of both before and after this patch with "log_buf_len=8M drm.debug=0x14 nouveau.debug=disp=trace,i2c=trace,bios=trace" please? Thanks, Ben.

On 21/07/19 2:59 AM, Ren? Schmidt via samba wrote: > Adding CN = SAD, CN = Servers, CN = Default First Site Name, CN = Sites, CN = Configuration, DC = mydom, DC = local > Adding CN = NTDS Settings, CN = SAD, CN = Servers, CN = Default First Site Name, CN = Sites, CN = Configuration, DC = mydom, DC = local > DsAddEntry failed with status WERR_ACCESS_DENIED info (8363,

Hi, I'm making tests to migrate our actual 4.4.5 to a latest versions and add a second dc. I have added a second dc with 4.10.7 and seems to work fine, now I have 4.4.5 with fsmo roles and a second dn with 4.10.7, but reading wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Upgrading_a_Samba_AD_DC seems that since latest days some changes about steps to upgrade, now seems that is recommended to us

On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 07:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > >> > > >> > Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for GM20x+ boards. If it's not > >>

On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > > > Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for GM20x+ boards. If it's not > > too much trouble, a bisect would be pretty useful. > > Bisection seemingly went fine, but the result is odd. > > e98c58e55f68f8785aebfab1f8c9a03d8de0afe1 is the

Hello, I have in production one big ups of 30 kVA (MAS-MC 330). I bought recently one Netvision SNMP card and NUT is working with snmp-ups driver: battery.charge: 100.0 battery.runtime: -60.0 battery.voltage: 483.8 driver.name: snmp-ups driver.parameter.mibs: netvision driver.parameter.port: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx driver.version: 2.0.2 driver.version.internal: 0.41 input.voltage: 219.0 output.current:

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> > >> > Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for GM20x+ boards. If it's not >> > too much trouble, a bisect would be pretty useful. >> >> Bisection

On 7/12/17 7:19 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 07:37 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:25 AM, Mike Galbraith <efault at gmx.de> wrote: >>> On Wed, 2017-07-12 at 11:55 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>>>> Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for

On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 14:22 -0400, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > Some display stuff did change for 4.13 for GM20x+ boards. If it's not > too much trouble, a bisect would be pretty useful. Bisection seemingly went fine, but the result is odd. e98c58e55f68f8785aebfab1f8c9a03d8de0afe1 is the first bad commit -Mike

Hi Rowland, Recently I have upgraded a single server 4.4.5 to 4.10.7 with in-place method and all seems to works fine. Can you give detail what are this advantages to upgrade with rejoins about database, performance (index recreated?), stability, dbcheck... what are the realadvantages and disadvantages to evaluate in our case what is the best method To rejoin I think with this steps: - fsmo

Hi, Bisected this to: commit df8dc97cd17269474344d73cc02739532c468d04 Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Date: Wed Mar 1 09:42:04 2017 +1000 drm/nouveau/kms/nv50: use drm core i2c-over-aux algorithm I'm not entirely sure NVKM needs to support this now, but I haven't removed it as of yet just in case it's needed from DEVINIT scripts where DRM isn't

Probably should have cc'd virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org too. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:08:39AM -0400, bfields at fieldses.org wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 08:23:34AM -0400, bfields at fieldses.org wrote: > > Unfortunately I can't get anything through testing. It's not your > > patches, it's something in -rc1. My server VM stops responding to

Probably should have cc'd virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org too. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:08:39AM -0400, bfields at fieldses.org wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 08:23:34AM -0400, bfields at fieldses.org wrote: > > Unfortunately I can't get anything through testing. It's not your > > patches, it's something in -rc1. My server VM stops responding to

Hello everybody, Thank you very much for your continued support. Unfortunately, I think that I will not get on with Samba in the situation. It is tried a lot and I come from one problem to the next. That's why I commissioned the Finazellen funds for Windows licenses for all sites today. Thus, I will run the Complete AD future on a pure Windows basis. Thank you for your help Best wishes

2017-05-15 3:03 GMT+03:00 Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com>: > On 05/15/2017 01:10 AM, Tommi Rantala wrote: >> >> Hi, > > Hey Tommi, > > Thanks for bisecting this. It's rather unexpected that you should be seeing > problems here, but, the commit makes sense for it at least. > > Are you able to get me new kernel logs of both before and after this

* Frame-packing modes add an extra vtotal raster lines to each frame above and beyond what the basic mode description calls for. Account for this during scaler configuration (possibly a bit of a hack), during CRTC configuration (clearly not a hack), and when checking that a mode is vaild for a given connector (cribbed from the i915 driver). Signed-off-by: Alastair Bridgewater