similar to: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:02:29AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > * Descriptor ring: > > > > > > Guest adds descriptors with unique index values and DESC_HW set in flags. > > > Host overwrites used descriptors with correct len, index, and DESC_HW > > > clear. Flags are always set/cleared last. > > > > May I know what's the

On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 11:57:15AM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 03:02:29AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > * Descriptor ring: > > > > > > > > Guest adds descriptors with unique index values and DESC_HW set in flags. > > > > Host overwrites used descriptors with correct len, index, and DESC_HW > > > >

When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, it will merge big packet into rx vq. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git

When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, it will merge big packet into rx vq. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git

When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, it will merge big packet into rx vq. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git

When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, it will merge big packet into rx vq. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 5 ++ 3 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git

On 2018/12/12 23:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >> When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, >> it will merge big packet into rx vq. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> > > I feel this approach jumps into making interface changes for > optimizations too

On 2018/12/12 23:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:29:31PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >> When vhost support VIRTIO_VSOCK_F_MRG_RXBUF feature, >> it will merge big packet into rx vq. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> > > I feel this approach jumps into making interface changes for > optimizations too

Guest receive mergeable rx buffer, it can merge scatter rx buffer into a big buffer and then copy to user space. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 9 ++++ net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed,

Guest receive mergeable rx buffer, it can merge scatter rx buffer into a big buffer and then copy to user space. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 9 ++++ net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++---- 3 files changed,

> -----Original Message----- > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 5:20 AM > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2 > > This is an update from v1

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:23 PM > To: Lior Narkis <liorn at mellanox.com> > Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2 > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:23 PM > To: Lior Narkis <liorn at mellanox.com> > Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2 > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis

Guest receive mergeable rx buffer, it can merge scatter rx buffer into a big buffer and then copy to user space. In addition, it also use iovec to replace buf in struct virtio_vsock_pkt, keep tx and rx consistency. The only difference is now tx still uses a segment of continuous physical memory to implement. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c

Guest receive mergeable rx buffer, it can merge scatter rx buffer into a big buffer and then copy to user space. In addition, it also use iovec to replace buf in struct virtio_vsock_pkt, keep tx and rx consistency. The only difference is now tx still uses a segment of continuous physical memory to implement. Signed-off-by: Yiwen Jiang <jiangyiwen at huawei.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:42:58AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi all, I wanted to raise the question of similarities between virtio > and new zero copy af_packet interfaces. > > First I would like to mention that virtio device development isn't spec > limited - spec is there to help interoperability and add peace of mind > for people worried about IPR. > > So

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 05:42:58AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Hi all, I wanted to raise the question of similarities between virtio > and new zero copy af_packet interfaces. > > First I would like to mention that virtio device development isn't spec > limited - spec is there to help interoperability and add peace of mind > for people worried about IPR. > > So

This is an update from v1 version. Changes: - update event suppression mechanism - separate options for indirect and direct s/g - lots of new features --- Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation. The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure, replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor buffer. * Descriptor ring: Guest adds descriptors with

This is an update from v1 version. Changes: - update event suppression mechanism - separate options for indirect and direct s/g - lots of new features --- Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation. The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure, replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor buffer. * Descriptor ring: Guest adds descriptors with

Hi Michael, On 2018/12/12 23:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 05:31:39PM +0800, jiangyiwen wrote: >> Guest receive mergeable rx buffer, it can merge >> scatter rx buffer into a big buffer and then copy >> to user space. >> >> In addition, it also use iovec to replace buf in struct >> virtio_vsock_pkt, keep tx and rx consistency. The