similar to: [PATCH] average: change to declare precision, not factor

__bitwise__ used to mean "yes, please enable sparse checks unconditionally", but now that we dropped __CHECK_ENDIAN__ __bitwise is exactly the same. There aren't many users, replace it by __bitwise everywhere. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-cache-block-types.h | 6

Sorry, forgot to Cc Michael and the virt list - patch reproduced below in full. johannes >From 22500fbcf722748fe3471b2e4c6156db47aade15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:25:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] virtio_net: use DECLARE_EWMA Instead of using the out-of-line EWMA calculation, use DECLARE_EWMA() to create static

Sorry, forgot to Cc Michael and the virt list - patch reproduced below in full. johannes >From 22500fbcf722748fe3471b2e4c6156db47aade15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg at intel.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 09:25:18 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] virtio_net: use DECLARE_EWMA Instead of using the out-of-line EWMA calculation, use DECLARE_EWMA() to create static

On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 10:23 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Perhaps these are simpler as > > #define __inline__ inline > #define __inline inline Currently, there are these uses of inline variants in the kernel $ git grep -w inline | wc -l 68410 $ git grep -w __inline__ | wc -l 503 $ git grep -w __inline | wc -l 57 So it seems it's also reasonable to sed all uses of __inline to

Hi everyone, My PC don't have an integrated WLAN card, so I bought an USB WIFI device which use the MediaTek MT7601U chip(image 'dongle.jpg'). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ My PC specification- OS = CentOS 7.8.2003. Processor = AMD Ryzen 5 1600. Mother-Board = GA-Gigabyte A320M-S2H

hi list members, my goal is to make one of my DomU''s act as a wireless accesspoint... So, i need it to have access to the pcmcia wlan card attached to dom0. But how ? when i give the pci=[] option to the domU config file its shows up with lspci but i cant use it... (on debian with module-assistent get rt2x00 in de DomU) Is it possible or would it be better to use a more direct interface

This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere. I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise. Michael S. Tsirkin (8): linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__

This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere. I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise. Michael S. Tsirkin (8): linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to

On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 12:50 -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:14 PM Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 10:23 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > Perhaps these are simpler as > > > > > > #define __inline__ inline > > > #define __inline inline > > > > Currently,

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:55:48AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:41:39 -0800 > "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > > > On 12/19/2017 7:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I'll need to look at this more, in particular the feature > > > bit is missing here. For now one question: > >

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:55:48AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 09:41:39 -0800 > "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala at intel.com> wrote: > > > On 12/19/2017 7:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > I'll need to look at this more, in particular the feature > > > bit is missing here. For now one question: > >

On 12/19/2017 7:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I'll need to look at this more, in particular the feature > bit is missing here. For now one question: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:40:36PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >> @@ -56,6 +58,8 @@ module_param(napi_tx, bool, 0644); >> */ >> DECLARE_EWMA(pkt_len, 0, 64) >> >> +#define

On 12/19/2017 7:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > I'll need to look at this more, in particular the feature > bit is missing here. For now one question: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:40:36PM -0800, Sridhar Samudrala wrote: >> @@ -56,6 +58,8 @@ module_param(napi_tx, bool, 0644); >> */ >> DECLARE_EWMA(pkt_len, 0, 64) >> >> +#define

Hello, Does anybody knows if the rt61 driver from rt2x00.serialmonkey.com works under centos 5? And if so, what is the recommended command to build this driver from sources, 'make install' or 'make install-fedora'? Thanks a lot! I need this driver for my ralink wlan card on my notebook. I also could build this driver under a fresh centos 5 installation, but it freezes my notebook

Hello, Maybe someone will run into the same problem, so here is how it works for me. I could not get work my wlan card (ralink rt61) with the driver from rt2x00.serialmonkey.com under CentOS 5 (2.6.18-8.1.1.el5). All drivers (beta and daily cvs) from this site freezes my system. So I get the driver from the Ralink support at http://www.ralinktech.com/ralink/Home/Support/Linux.html