similar to: FW: Question about /patch/9251925/

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches similar to: "FW: Question about /patch/9251925/"

2006 Mar 24
2
[PATCH] qemu pcnet emulation fixes
The attached patch to the qemu emulation of the pcnet hardware fixes several problems. It will now only read and write a transmit or receive descriptor once. It will correctly handle transmitting frames with more than two fragments. It will discard oversize frames instead of corrupting memory. I have tested all the changes I have made and even seen an improvement in receive performance from
2007 Nov 26
0
[PATCH] [Mini-OS] Make gnttab allocation/free safe
Add a semaphore to protect gnttab_list from exhaustion, and disable callbacks during allocation/free. Fix the network frontend accordingly. Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@citrix.com> diff -r bb961bda7eff extras/mini-os/gnttab.c --- a/extras/mini-os/gnttab.c Sun Nov 25 21:24:48 2007 +0000 +++ b/extras/mini-os/gnttab.c Mon Nov 26 11:50:31 2007 +0000 @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
2010 Oct 01
2
trouble building 4.0.1
I finally decided to build 4.0.1 on my OpenSuSE box. I''ve been plodding along and resolving issues/dependencies as needed but now I''m stumped. While building I get the following message: cc1: warnings being treated as errors netfront.c:41:32: error: variably modified ‘tx_freelist’ at file scope netfront.c:44:34: error: variably modified ‘rx_buffers’ at file scope
2012 Nov 20
52
[PATCH RFC] stubdom: Change vTPM shared page ABI
Since the vTPM implementations are being incorproated into Xen and possibly upstream Linux, I would like to see if this protocol change could be added before we have significant legacy implementations. If not, I still think it would be useful as either a v2 or negotiated protocol change. The current vTPM protocol is a copy of the network protocol. This was likely done for ease of implementation,
2007 Sep 23
9
Confused about start of day setup
Hi, I hope I''m right here. If not then please point me in the right direction. My problem in short: I have problems using (pinning, mmu_update) physical pages from 0x900000 to 0xB1000 usualy. I''m writing my own little amd64 64bit toy kernel (based on Mini-OS as starting point) for xen and I run into problems with the way the start of day sets up the physical pages. My kernel
2006 Jul 06
12
kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1133!
Looks like the GSO is involved? I got this while running Dom0 only (no guests), with a BOINC/Rosetta@home application running on all 4 cores. changeset: 10649:8e55c5c11475 Build: x86_32p (pae). ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1133! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 EIP: 0061:[<c04dceb0>] Not tainted VLI EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.16.13-xen