similar to: automatic IRQ affinity for virtio V3

Hi Michael, hi Jason, This patches applies a few cleanups to the virtio PCI interrupt handling code, and then converts the virtio PCI code to use the automatic MSI-X vectors spreading, as well as using the information in virtio-blk and virtio-scsi to automatically align the blk-mq queues to the MSI-X vectors. Changes since V1: - dropped the patches already merged for 4.10-rc - new patch to

Hi Michael, hi Jason, This patches applies a few cleanups to the virtio PCI interrupt handling code, and then converts the virtio PCI code to use the automatic MSI-X vectors spreading, as well as using the information in virtio-blk and virtio-scsi to automatically align the blk-mq queues to the MSI-X vectors. Changes since V1: - dropped the patches already merged for 4.10-rc - new patch to

On 2017?02?06? 01:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >

On 2017?02?06? 01:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We don't really need struct virtio_pci_vq_info, as most field in there > are redundant: > > - the vq backpointer is not strictly neede to start with > - the entry in the vqs list is not needed - the generic virtqueue already > has list, we only need to check if it has a callback to get the same > semantics >

Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper. All these are in preparation of taking advantage of the new PCI layer / core IRQ interrupt affinity handling, for which I will send out a series once this and some core interrupt handling changes are in.

Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper. All these are in preparation of taking advantage of the new PCI layer / core IRQ interrupt affinity handling, for which I will send out a series once this and some core interrupt handling changes are in.

Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper, and support for automatic affinity by the PCI layer if the consumers ask for it. It then converts over virtio_blk to use this functionality so that it's blk-mq queues are aligned to the MSI-X vector routing. I have a similar patch in the

Hi Michael, this series contains a couple cleanups for the virtio_pci interrupt handling code, including a switch to the new pci_irq_alloc_vectors helper, and support for automatic affinity by the PCI layer if the consumers ask for it. It then converts over virtio_blk to use this functionality so that it's blk-mq queues are aligned to the MSI-X vector routing. I have a similar patch in the

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:13:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >From 312859b596e83a2164a8430343d31fce2a5ad808 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:07:16 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] virtio_pci: fix out of bound access for msix_names > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> I tested this, and it

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 01:13:50PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >From 312859b596e83a2164a8430343d31fce2a5ad808 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:07:16 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] virtio_pci: fix out of bound access for msix_names > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> I tested this, and it

Hi all: This series try to share MSIX irq for each tx/rx queue pair. This is done through: - introducing virtio pci channel which are group of virtqueues that sharing a single MSIX irq (Patch 1) - expose channel setting to virtio core api (Patch 2) - try to use channel setting in virtio-net (Patch 3) For the transport that does not support channel, channel paramters were simply ignored. For

Hi all: This series try to share MSIX irq for each tx/rx queue pair. This is done through: - introducing virtio pci channel which are group of virtqueues that sharing a single MSIX irq (Patch 1) - expose channel setting to virtio core api (Patch 2) - try to use channel setting in virtio-net (Patch 3) For the transport that does not support channel, channel paramters were simply ignored. For

I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range

I've renewed this again, with some comments from HPA. I've tried to keep the new patches separate, so you can see the changes since we last discussed this (and so it's easy to back it out if we decide it's insane). I haven't even looked at the QEMU side so this is completely untested. Comments gratefully received! Rusty. Michael S Tsirkin (1): pci: add pci_iomap_range

Hi, Fedora has received multiple reports of crashes when running 4.11 as a guest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430297 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434462 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194911 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433899 The crashes are not always consistent but they are generally some flavor of oops or GPF in virtio related

Hi, Fedora has received multiple reports of crashes when running 4.11 as a guest https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430297 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434462 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194911 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433899 The crashes are not always consistent but they are generally some flavor of oops or GPF in virtio related

Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.

Here's the patch series I ended up with. I haven't coded up the QEMU side yet, so no idea if the new driver works. Questions: (1) Do we win from separating ISR, NOTIFY and COMMON? (2) I used a "u8 bar"; should I use a bir and pack it instead? BIR seems a little obscure (noone else in the kernel source seems to refer to it). Cheers, Rusty.

One VM only has 128 msix interrupt, virtio-config interrupt has less workload. This patch shares one normal interrupt for configuration between virtio devices. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c

One VM only has 128 msix interrupt, virtio-config interrupt has less workload. This patch shares one normal interrupt for configuration between virtio devices. Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong at redhat.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c