similar to: [PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups"

2016 Dec 15
6
[PATCH 0/8] enable endian checks for all sparse builds
This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere. I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise. Michael S. Tsirkin (8): linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__
2016 Dec 15
6
[PATCH 0/8] enable endian checks for all sparse builds
This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere. I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise. Michael S. Tsirkin (8): linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__
2016 Dec 15
0
[PATCH 5/8] linux: drop __bitwise__ everywhere
__bitwise__ used to mean "yes, please enable sparse checks unconditionally", but now that we dropped __CHECK_ENDIAN__ __bitwise is exactly the same. There aren't many users, replace it by __bitwise everywhere. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> --- arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h | 2 +- drivers/md/dm-cache-block-types.h | 6
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series... Joe Perches (44): arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series... Joe Perches (44): arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series... Joe Perches (44): arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series... Joe Perches (44): arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2016 Dec 16
1
[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:20:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus > > Pulled, but I wonder... > > > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/sparse.txt | 7 +- > >
2016 Dec 16
1
[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:20:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus > > Pulled, but I wonder... > > > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/sparse.txt | 7 +- > >
2016 Dec 16
0
[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus Pulled, but I wonder... > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/sparse.txt | 7 +- > arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h | 2 +- > drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_common.h | 128 +++++
2018 Feb 12
5
[PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_* that don't already #include it. Also remove <linux/kmemleak.h> from source files that do not use it. This is
2018 Feb 12
5
[PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org> Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_* that don't already #include it. Also remove <linux/kmemleak.h> from source files that do not use it. This is
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough to the next case label block. See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use") These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Oct 17
1
[Cocci] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by
2020 Oct 17
1
[Cocci] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote: > > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> > > > > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. > > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or > > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by
2020 Oct 17
10
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com> This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide. I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting early acks. clang has a number of useful, new warnings see