Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups"
2016 Dec 15
6
[PATCH 0/8] enable endian checks for all sparse builds
This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition
of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere.
I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise.
Michael S. Tsirkin (8):
linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__
2016 Dec 15
6
[PATCH 0/8] enable endian checks for all sparse builds
This is just a reposting of the patch that enables endian checks, with addition
of trivial patches that drop __bitwise__ and __CHECK_ENDIAN__ everywhere.
I plan to include this in my pull request unless I hear otherwise.
Michael S. Tsirkin (8):
linux/types.h: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
tools: enable endian checks for all sparse builds
Documentation/sparse: drop __bitwise__
2016 Dec 15
0
[PATCH 5/8] linux: drop __bitwise__ everywhere
__bitwise__ used to mean "yes, please enable sparse checks
unconditionally", but now that we dropped __CHECK_ENDIAN__
__bitwise is exactly the same.
There aren't many users, replace it by __bitwise everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h | 2 +-
drivers/md/dm-cache-block-types.h | 6
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series...
Joe Perches (44):
arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series...
Joe Perches (44):
arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series...
Joe Perches (44):
arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2010 Nov 15
2
[PATCH 00/44] remove unnecessary semicolons
ya trivial series...
Joe Perches (44):
arch/arm: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/microblaze: Remove unnecessary semicolons
arch/um: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/cpufreq: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/gpio: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/i2c: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/isdn: Remove unnecessary semicolons
drivers/leds: Remove unnecessary
2016 Dec 16
1
[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:20:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus
>
> Pulled, but I wonder...
>
> > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/sparse.txt | 7 +-
> >
2016 Dec 16
1
[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:20:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus
>
> Pulled, but I wonder...
>
> > Documentation/translations/zh_CN/sparse.txt | 7 +-
> >
2016 Dec 16
0
[PULL] virtio, vhost: new device, fixes, speedups
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus
Pulled, but I wonder...
> Documentation/translations/zh_CN/sparse.txt | 7 +-
> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/gpio-cfg.h | 2 +-
> drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_common.h | 128 +++++
2018 Feb 12
5
[PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious
reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h
from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_*
that don't already #include it.
Also remove <linux/kmemleak.h> from source files that do not use it.
This is
2018 Feb 12
5
[PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap at infradead.org>
Currently <linux/slab.h> #includes <linux/kmemleak.h> for no obvious
reason. It looks like it's only a convenience, so remove kmemleak.h
from slab.h and add <linux/kmemleak.h> to any users of kmemleak_*
that don't already #include it.
Also remove <linux/kmemleak.h> from source files that do not use it.
This is
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used
to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are
used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough
to the next case label block.
See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough'
pseudo keyword for switch/case use")
These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used
to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are
used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough
to the next case label block.
See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough'
pseudo keyword for switch/case use")
These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used
to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are
used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough
to the next case label block.
See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough'
pseudo keyword for switch/case use")
These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used
to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are
used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough
to the next case label block.
See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough'
pseudo keyword for switch/case use")
These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Mar 11
0
[PATCH -next 000/491] treewide: use fallthrough;
There is a new fallthrough pseudo-keyword macro that can be used
to replace the various /* fallthrough */ style comments that are
used to indicate a case label code block is intended to fallthrough
to the next case label block.
See commit 294f69e662d1 ("compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough'
pseudo keyword for switch/case use")
These patches are intended to allow clang to
2020 Oct 17
1
[Cocci] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
> >
> > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by
2020 Oct 17
1
[Cocci] [RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
On Sat, 17 Oct 2020, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-10-17 at 09:09 -0700, trix at redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
> >
> > This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
> > I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
> > normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by
2020 Oct 17
10
[RFC] treewide: cleanup unreachable breaks
From: Tom Rix <trix at redhat.com>
This is a upcoming change to clean up a new warning treewide.
I am wondering if the change could be one mega patch (see below) or
normal patch per file about 100 patches or somewhere half way by collecting
early acks.
clang has a number of useful, new warnings see