similar to: [PATCH v4 0/4] vsock: cancel connect packets when failing to connect

Hi David, These patchsets were sent before and reviewed by Stefan and Jorgen [https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg142367.html]. If there is any blocker, please do tell and I'll see to it. Thanks! Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent

Hi David, These patchsets were sent before and reviewed by Stefan and Jorgen [https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg142367.html]. If there is any blocker, please do tell and I'll see to it. Thanks! Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

To allow canceling all packets of a connection. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf at gmail.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index a504e2e0..fef8808 100644 ---

To allow canceling all packets of a connection. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf at gmail.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index a504e2e0..fef8808 100644 ---

To allow canceling all packets of a connection. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf at gmail.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index a504e2e0..db64d51 100644 ---

To allow canceling all packets of a connection. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf at gmail.com> --- drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/net/af_vsock.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c index a504e2e0..db64d51 100644 ---

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Currently, if a connect call fails on a signal or timeout (e.g., guest is still in the process of starting up), we'll just return to caller and leave the connect packet queued and they are sent even though the connection is considered a failure, which can confuse applications with unwanted false connect attempt. The patchset enables vsock (both host and guest) to cancel queued packets when a

Most of the patches are reviewed by Dexuan, Stefan, and Jorgen. The following patches need reviews: - [11/15] vsock: add multi-transports support - [12/15] vsock/vmci: register vmci_transport only when VMCI guest/host are active - [15/15] vhost/vsock: refuse CID assigned to the guest->host transport RFC: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1168442/ v1:

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in

Hi, now that we have multi-transport upstream, I started to take a look to support network namespace (netns) in vsock. As we partially discussed in the multi-transport proposal [1], it could be nice to support network namespace in vsock to reach the following goals: - isolate host applications from guest applications using the same ports with CID_ANY - assign the same CID of VMs running in

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

Hi all, this series adds the multi-transports support to vsock, following this proposal: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg575792.html With the multi-transports support, we can use vsock with nested VMs (using also different hypervisors) loading both guest->host and host->guest transports at the same time. Before this series, vmci-transport supported this behavior but only using

This series is based on v4.7. This RFC is the implementation for the new VIRTIO Socket device. It is developed in parallel with the VIRTIO device specification and proves the design. Once the specification has been accepted I will send a non-RFC version of this patch series. v6: * Add VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING ioctl to start/stop vhost cleanly * Add graceful shutdown to avoid port reuse while