similar to: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/spinlock: Provide vcpu_is_preempted

this implements the s390 backend for commit "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface" by reworking the existing smp_vcpu_scheduled into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. We can then also get rid of the local cpu_is_preempted function by moving the CIF_ENABLED_WAIT test into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> ---

this implements the s390 backend for commit "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface" by reworking the existing smp_vcpu_scheduled into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. We can then also get rid of the local cpu_is_preempted function by moving the CIF_ENABLED_WAIT test into arch_vcpu_is_preempted. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> ---

change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc,

change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code change, fix typos, update some comments change from v1: a simplier definition of default vcpu_is_preempted skip mahcine type check on ppc,

change from v6: fix typos and remove uncessary comments. change from v5: spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part. introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached. fix some typos. rebase patch onto 4.9.2 change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3:

change from v6: fix typos and remove uncessary comments. change from v5: spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part. introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached. fix some typos. rebase patch onto 4.9.2 change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3:

change from v5: spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part. introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached. fix some typos. rebase patch onto 4.9.2 change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code

change from v5: spilt x86/kvm patch into guest/host part. introduce kvm_write_guest_offset_cached. fix some typos. rebase patch onto 4.9.2 change from v4: spilt x86 kvm vcpu preempted check into two patches. add documentation patch. add x86 vcpu preempted check patch under xen add s390 vcpu preempted check patch change from v3: add x86 vcpu preempted check patch change from v2: no code

On 09/30/2016 08:35 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote: > > > ? 2016/9/30 13:52, Boqun Feng ??: >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:49:52PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: >>> >>> >>> ? 2016/9/29 23:51, Christian Borntraeger ??: >>>> this implements the s390 backend for commit >>>> "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface"

On 09/30/2016 08:35 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote: > > > ? 2016/9/30 13:52, Boqun Feng ??: >> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:49:52PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: >>> >>> >>> ? 2016/9/29 23:51, Christian Borntraeger ??: >>>> this implements the s390 backend for commit >>>> "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface"

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 08:56:36AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 09/29/2016 05:51 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > this implements the s390 backend for commit > > "kernel/sched: introduce vcpu preempted check interface" > > by reworking the existing smp_vcpu_scheduled into > > arch_vcpu_is_preempted. We can then also get rid of the > >

On 28.12.2018 03:26, Wei Wang wrote: > Some vqs don't need to be allocated when the related feature bits are > disabled. Callers notice the vq allocation layer by setting the related > names[i] to be NULL. > > This patch series fixes the find_vqs implementations to handle this case. So the random crashes during boot are gone. What still does not work is actually using the

Some vqs don't need to be allocated when the related feature bits are disabled. Callers notice the vq allocation layer by setting the related names[i] to be NULL. This patch series fixes the find_vqs implementations to handle this case. Wei Wang (2): virtio_pci: use queue idx instead of array idx to set up the vq virtio: don't allocate vqs when names[i] = NULL

Some vqs don't need to be allocated when the related feature bits are disabled. Callers notice the vq allocation layer by setting the related names[i] to be NULL. This patch series fixes the find_vqs implementations to handle this case. Wei Wang (2): virtio_pci: use queue idx instead of array idx to set up the vq virtio: don't allocate vqs when names[i] = NULL