similar to: [PATCH] drivers: virtio_blk: notify blk-core when hw-queue number changes

On 06/19/2016 06:10 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 13/06/2016 11:58, Bob Liu wrote: >> A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the >> blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> >> --- >> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c |

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

Hi, These patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance on virtio-blk device can get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq and

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:08:46AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > Firstly this patch supports more than one virtual queues for virtio-blk > device. > > Secondly this patch maps the virtual queue to blk-mq's hardware queue. > > With this approach, both scalability and performance can be improved. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at canonical.com> > --- >

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:08:46AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > Firstly this patch supports more than one virtual queues for virtio-blk > device. > > Secondly this patch maps the virtual queue to blk-mq's hardware queue. > > With this approach, both scalability and performance can be improved. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at canonical.com> > --- >

A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 42758b5..c169238 100644 ---

A guest might be migrated to other hosts with different num_queues, the blk-core should aware of that else the reference of &vblk->vqs[qid] may be wrong. Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu at oracle.com> --- drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c index 42758b5..c169238 100644 ---

Hi, This patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance problems on virtio-blk device get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq

Hi, This patches try to support multi virtual queues(multi-vq) in one virtio-blk device, and maps each virtual queue(vq) to blk-mq's hardware queue. With this approach, both scalability and performance problems on virtio-blk device get improved. For verifying the improvement, I implements virtio-blk multi-vq over qemu's dataplane feature, and both handling host notification from each vq

When tag_set->nr_maps is 1, the block layer limits the number of hw queues by nr_cpu_ids. No matter how many hw queues are use by virtio-blk/virtio-scsi, as they both have (tag_set->nr_maps == 1), they can use at most nr_cpu_ids hw queues. In addition, specifically for pci scenario, when the 'num-queues' specified by qemu is more than maxcpus, virtio-blk/virtio-scsi would not be

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:29:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > Firstly this patch supports more than one virtual queues for virtio-blk > device. > > Secondly this patch maps the virtual queue to blk-mq's hardware queue. > > With this approach, both scalability and performance can be improved. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at canonical.com> > --- >

On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:29:40PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > Firstly this patch supports more than one virtual queues for virtio-blk > device. > > Secondly this patch maps the virtual queue to blk-mq's hardware queue. > > With this approach, both scalability and performance can be improved. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei at canonical.com> > --- >

On 3/13/19 5:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:26:04 +0800 > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > >> On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) >>> Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I observed that there is one msix vector for

On 3/13/19 5:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 11:26:04 +0800 > Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: > >> On 3/13/19 1:33 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) >>> Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang at oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I observed that there is one msix vector for

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:25:27AM +0800, John Garry wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > > Add a new field 'nr_reserved_cmds' to the SCSI host template to > instruct the block layer to set aside a tag space for reserved > commands. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 + >

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 12:25:27AM +0800, John Garry wrote: > From: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > > Add a new field 'nr_reserved_cmds' to the SCSI host template to > instruct the block layer to set aside a tag space for reserved > commands. > > Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare at suse.com> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 + >