Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v5 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu"
2016 Apr 05
10
[PATCH v4 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Apr 05
10
[PATCH v4 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Aug 29
6
[PATCH v6 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Aug 29
6
[PATCH v6 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Apr 01
8
[PATCH v3 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Apr 01
8
[PATCH v3 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Mar 21
8
[PATCH v2 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Mar 21
8
[PATCH v2 0/6] Support calling functions on dedicated physical cpu
Some hardware (e.g. Dell Studio laptops) require special functions to
be called on physical cpu 0 in order to avoid occasional hangs. When
running as dom0 under Xen this could be achieved only via special boot
parameters (vcpu pinning) limiting the hypervisor in it's scheduling
decisions.
This patch series is adding a generic function to be able to temporarily
pin a (virtual) cpu to a
2016 Apr 21
2
[PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
On Thursday 21 April 2016 15:12:52 Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 21/04/16 12:57, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>>> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management
>
2016 Apr 21
2
[PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
On Thursday 21 April 2016 15:12:52 Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 21/04/16 12:57, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >>>> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management
>
2016 Apr 21
2
[PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management
> > > mode on cpu 0.
> > > Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend
> > > resume
2016 Apr 21
2
[PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
On Tuesday 05 April 2016 21:31:52 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:54:14 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> > > Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management
> > > mode on cpu 0.
> > > Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend
> > > resume
2016 Apr 05
2
[PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management
> mode on cpu 0.
> Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend
> resume cycles in between.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
> ---
> V4: add call to get_online_cpus()
Pali, any chance to test this ?
2016 Apr 05
2
[PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 07:10:07AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management
> mode on cpu 0.
> Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend
> resume cycles in between.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
> ---
> V4: add call to get_online_cpus()
Pali, any chance to test this ?
2016 Apr 06
0
[PATCH v5 5/6] dcdbas: make use of smp_call_on_cpu()
Use smp_call_on_cpu() to raise SMI on cpu 0.
Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend
resume cycles in between.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
---
V4: add call to get_online_cpus()
---
drivers/firmware/dcdbas.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 5/6] virt, sched: add cpu pinning to smp_call_sync_on_phys_cpu()
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:28:46AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 01/04/16 09:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:14:33AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/smp.h>
> >> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> >> #include
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 5/6] virt, sched: add cpu pinning to smp_call_sync_on_phys_cpu()
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:28:46AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 01/04/16 09:43, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:14:33AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> >> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> >> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/smp.h>
> >> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> >> #include
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 5/6] virt, sched: add cpu pinning to smp_call_sync_on_phys_cpu()
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:14:33AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/hypervisor.h>
>
> #include "smpboot.h"
>
> @@ -758,9 +759,14 @@ struct smp_sync_call_struct {
>
2016 Apr 01
2
[PATCH v3 5/6] virt, sched: add cpu pinning to smp_call_sync_on_phys_cpu()
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 09:14:33AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/hypervisor.h>
>
> #include "smpboot.h"
>
> @@ -758,9 +759,14 @@ struct smp_sync_call_struct {
>
2016 Apr 05
0
[PATCH v4 6/6] hwmon: use smp_call_on_cpu() for dell-smm i8k
Use the smp_call_on_cpu() function to call system management
mode on cpu 0.
Make call secure by adding get_online_cpus() to avoid e.g. suspend
resume cycles in between.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross at suse.com>
---
V4: add call to get_online_cpus()
---
drivers/hwmon/dell-smm-hwmon.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff