similar to: [PATCH] VSOCK: Detach QP check should filter out non matching QPs.

In the vsock vmci_transport driver, sock_put wasn't safe to call in interrupt context, since that may call the vsock destructor which in turn calls several functions that should only be called from process context. This change defers the callling of these functions to a worker thread. All these functions were deallocation of resources related to the transport itself. Furthermore, an unused

In the vsock vmci_transport driver, sock_put wasn't safe to call in interrupt context, since that may call the vsock destructor which in turn calls several functions that should only be called from process context. This change defers the callling of these functions to a worker thread. All these functions were deallocation of resources related to the transport itself. Furthermore, an unused

If skb_recv_datagram returns an skb, we should ignore the err value returned. Otherwise, datagram receives will return EAGAIN when they have to wait for a datagram. Acked-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr at vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 7 ++----- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git

If skb_recv_datagram returns an skb, we should ignore the err value returned. Otherwise, datagram receives will return EAGAIN when they have to wait for a datagram. Acked-by: Adit Ranadive <aditr at vmware.com> Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen at vmware.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c | 7 ++----- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git

The VMCI handle array has an integer overflow in vmci_handle_arr_append_entry when it tries to expand the array. This can be triggered from a guest, since the doorbell link hypercall doesn't impose a limit on the number of doorbell handles that a VM can create in the hypervisor, and these handles are stored in a handle array. In this change, we introduce a mandatory max capacity for handle

When using the host personality, VMCI will grab a mutex for any queue pair access. In the detach callback for the vmci vsock transport, we call vsock_stream_has_data while holding a spinlock, and vsock_stream_has_data will access a queue pair. To avoid this, we can simply omit calling vsock_stream_has_data for host side queue pairs, since the QPs are empty per default when the guest has detached.

When using the host personality, VMCI will grab a mutex for any queue pair access. In the detach callback for the vmci vsock transport, we call vsock_stream_has_data while holding a spinlock, and vsock_stream_has_data will access a queue pair. To avoid this, we can simply omit calling vsock_stream_has_data for host side queue pairs, since the QPs are empty per default when the guest has detached.

When using the host personality, VMCI will grab a mutex for any queue pair access. In the detach callback for the vmci vsock transport, we call vsock_stream_has_data while holding a spinlock, and vsock_stream_has_data will access a queue pair. To avoid this, we can simply omit calling vsock_stream_has_data for host side queue pairs, since the QPs are empty per default when the guest has detached.

When using the host personality, VMCI will grab a mutex for any queue pair access. In the detach callback for the vmci vsock transport, we call vsock_stream_has_data while holding a spinlock, and vsock_stream_has_data will access a queue pair. To avoid this, we can simply omit calling vsock_stream_has_data for host side queue pairs, since the QPs are empty per default when the guest has detached.

virtio_transport and vmci_transport handle the buffer_size sockopts in a very similar way. In order to support multiple transports, this patch moves this handling in the core to allow the user to change the options also if the socket is not yet assigned to any transport. This patch also adds the '.notify_buffer_size' callback in the 'struct virtio_transport' in order to inform

virtio_transport and vmci_transport handle the buffer_size sockopts in a very similar way. In order to support multiple transports, this patch moves this handling in the core to allow the user to change the options also if the socket is not yet assigned to any transport. This patch also adds the '.notify_buffer_size' callback in the 'struct virtio_transport' in order to inform

From: Andy King <acking at vmware.com> ** Introduce VM Sockets *** In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the VM Sockets (VSOCK, formerly VMCI Sockets) (vmw_vsock) kernel module for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module. Unlike previous

From: Andy King <acking at vmware.com> ** Introduce VM Sockets *** In an effort to improve the out-of-the-box experience with Linux kernels for VMware users, VMware is working on readying the VM Sockets (VSOCK, formerly VMCI Sockets) (vmw_vsock) kernel module for inclusion in the Linux kernel. The purpose of this post is to acquire feedback on the vmw_vsock kernel module. Unlike previous

> From: Stefano Garzarella [mailto:sgarzare at redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 11:56 AM > Subject: [PATCH net-next 07/14] vsock: handle buffer_size sockopts in the > core > > virtio_transport and vmci_transport handle the buffer_size sockopts in a > very similar way. > > In order to support multiple transports, this patch moves this handling in the >

* * * This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments. Summary of changes: - Rebase our linux kernel tree from v3.5 to v3.7. - Fix all checkpatch warnings and errors. Fix some checkpatch with -strict errors. This addresses Greg's comment: On 15 Nov 2012

* * * This series of VSOCK linux upstreaming patches include latest udpate from VMware to address Greg's and all other's code review comments. Summary of changes: - Rebase our linux kernel tree from v3.5 to v3.7. - Fix all checkpatch warnings and errors. Fix some checkpatch with -strict errors. This addresses Greg's comment: On 15 Nov 2012

Dear R Users , As a beginner in QP, I'm trying to solve a Support Vector Machine problem by a QP. In particulare I am using the quadprog package. My questions are here: 1- In the document for the package (The quadprog Package), the inequality constraint is mentioned with >= , however in a standard QP, this usaully is written with <= . This constraint should be multiplied by a

Hi I'm having problems getting the "factorized" argument in solve.QP (part of the quadprog library) to work as expected. The helpfile states that when the factorized argument is set to TRUE, then the function requires the inverse of a square-root factor of the Hessian instead of the Hessian itself. That is, when factorized=TRUE, the Dmat argument should be a matrix R^(-1), such

Dear R users, I'm trying to run the Support Vector Regression by a general quadratic programming function like ipop ( ) in kernlab or solve.QP ( ) in quadprog packages. Since they are general, their application in Support Vector Regression can lead to misunderstanding, particularly when constructing matrices. Even their examples are general and applied in Support Vector

I was thinking about my solve.qp problem on my way home tonight and I think I can fix it by making Dmat the identity matrix. I'll check this weekend to make sure but my thinking is that doing this will make all the "variances" the same so that they shouldn't come into play during the evaluation of the objective function. Thanks though for any confirmation of this or other