Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH v3 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers"
2016 Jan 11
6
[PATCH v4 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the pull request including
the series.
changes from v3:
rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems
as suggested by Julian Calaby.
add (?: ... ) around a
2016 Jan 11
6
[PATCH v4 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This replaces the checkpatch patches in my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the pull request including
the series.
changes from v3:
rename smp_barrier_stems to barrier_stems
as suggested by Julian Calaby.
add (?: ... ) around a
2016 Jan 10
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> presence of a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 10
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> presence of a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 11
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > > presence of a comment.
> []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 11
2
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > > presence of a comment.
> []
> > > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
2016 Jan 10
5
[PATCH v2 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This applies on top of my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the next version of the series.
Changes from v2:
catch optional\s* before () in barriers
rewrite using qr{} instead of map
Michael S. Tsirkin (3):
checkpatch.pl: add
2016 Jan 10
5
[PATCH v2 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This applies on top of my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the next version of the series.
Changes from v2:
catch optional\s* before () in barriers
rewrite using qr{} instead of map
Michael S. Tsirkin (3):
checkpatch.pl: add
2016 Jan 04
5
[PATCH 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This applies on top of my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the next version of the series.
Michael S. Tsirkin (3):
checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h
checkpatch: add virt
2016 Jan 04
5
[PATCH 0/3] checkpatch: handling of memory barriers
As part of memory barrier cleanup, this patchset
extends checkpatch to make it easier to stop
incorrect memory barrier usage.
This applies on top of my series
arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
and will be included in the next version of the series.
Michael S. Tsirkin (3):
checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
checkpatch: check for __smp outside barrier.h
checkpatch: add virt
2016 Jan 10
3
[PATCH v2 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 13:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> SMP-only barriers were missing in checkpatch.pl
>
> Refactor code slightly to make adding more variants easier.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -5116,7 +5116,25 @@ sub process {
> ? }
> ? }
> ?# check for memory barriers without a comment.
> - if ($line =~
2016 Jan 10
3
[PATCH v2 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 13:56 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> SMP-only barriers were missing in checkpatch.pl
>
> Refactor code slightly to make adding more variants easier.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -5116,7 +5116,25 @@ sub process {
> ? }
> ? }
> ?# check for memory barriers without a comment.
> - if ($line =~
2016 Jan 11
0
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 09:40:18PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at
2016 Jan 11
0
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
Hi Michael,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 02:52:16PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
2016 Jan 10
0
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 09:13 +1100, Julian Calaby wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
> > presence of a comment.
[]
> > diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> > @@ -5133,7 +5133,8 @@ sub process {
> > ????????????????}x;
>
2016 Jan 10
0
[PATCH v3 3/3] checkpatch: add virt barriers
Add virt_ barriers to list of barriers to check for
presence of a comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 15cfca4..4466579 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -5133,7 +5133,8 @@ sub process {
2016 Jan 04
4
[PATCH 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 13:36 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> SMP-only barriers were missing in checkpatch.pl
>
> Refactor code slightly to make adding more variants easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> ?scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 ++++++++-
> ?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
2016 Jan 04
4
[PATCH 1/3] checkpatch.pl: add missing memory barriers
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 13:36 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> SMP-only barriers were missing in checkpatch.pl
>
> Refactor code slightly to make adding more variants easier.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com>
> ---
> ?scripts/checkpatch.pl | 9 ++++++++-
> ?1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
2016 Jan 04
4
[PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:12:44AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:24:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > My only concern is that it gives people an additional handle onto a
> > "new" set of barriers - just because they're prefixed with __*
> > unfortunately doesn't stop anyone from using it (been there with
>
2016 Jan 04
4
[PATCH v2 17/32] arm: define __smp_xxx
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 11:12:44AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 11:24:38AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > My only concern is that it gives people an additional handle onto a
> > "new" set of barriers - just because they're prefixed with __*
> > unfortunately doesn't stop anyone from using it (been there with
>