similar to: [PATCH net-next 3/3] vhost_net: basic polling support

On 12/01/2015 10:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:17:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive >>>>> queue for a while at the end of

On 12/01/2015 10:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:17:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>>> This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive >>>>> queue for a while at the end of

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 01:04:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 12/01/2015 10:43 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:17:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > >> On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>>>> This patch tries to

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:17:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 11/30/2015 06:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:11:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >> > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive > >> > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time > >> > spent on

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:11:35AM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote: > On 2016/1/20 22:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive > >>queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time > >>spent on polling were specified through a new

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:11:35AM +0800, Yang Zhang wrote: > On 2016/1/20 22:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive > >>queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time > >>spent on polling were specified through a new

On 2018?07?02? 20:57, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be > used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch, > qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue. > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao at didichuxing.com> > --- >

On 2018?07?02? 20:57, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be > used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch, > qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue. > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao at didichuxing.com> > --- >

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/net.c | 72

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/net.c | 72

On 2018?06?30? 14:33, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be > used for tx path in the next patch. And with the patch, > qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue. > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <zhangtonghao at didichuxing.com> > --- >

On 2018?07?03? 13:48, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:12 AM Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> On 2018?07?02? 20:57, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: >>> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> >>> >>> Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be >>> used for in tx path in the

On 02/26/2016 09:42 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/net.c | 79

On 02/26/2016 09:42 AM, Jason Wang wrote: > This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive > queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time > spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > --- > drivers/vhost/net.c | 79

On 2018?08?01? 11:00, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be > used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch, > qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue. > > In the handle_tx, the busypoll will vhost_net_disable/enable_vq > because we

On 2018?08?01? 11:00, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > Factor out generic busy polling logic and will be > used for in tx path in the next patch. And with the patch, > qemu can set differently the busyloop_timeout for rx queue. > > In the handle_tx, the busypoll will vhost_net_disable/enable_vq > because we

On 2016/1/20 22:35, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:39:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive >> queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time >> spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at

When we decide not use zero-copy, msg.control should be set to NULL otherwise macvtap/tap may set zerocopy callbacks which may decrease the kref of ubufs wrongly. Bug were introduced by commit cedb9bdce099206290a2bdd02ce47a7b253b6a84 (vhost-net: skip head management if no outstanding). This solves the following warnings: WARNING: at include/linux/kref.h:47 handle_tx+0x477/0x4b0 [vhost_net]()

When we decide not use zero-copy, msg.control should be set to NULL otherwise macvtap/tap may set zerocopy callbacks which may decrease the kref of ubufs wrongly. Bug were introduced by commit cedb9bdce099206290a2bdd02ce47a7b253b6a84 (vhost-net: skip head management if no outstanding). This solves the following warnings: WARNING: at include/linux/kref.h:47 handle_tx+0x477/0x4b0 [vhost_net]()

This patch tries to poll for new added tx buffer or socket receive queue for a while at the end of tx/rx processing. The maximum time spent on polling were specified through a new kind of vring ioctl. Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> --- drivers/vhost/net.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 14 ++++++++