similar to: [PATCHv3 0/3] dma ops and virtio

here is the 2nd version of providing an DMA API for s390. There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well as some attempts to make virtio use the dma API (Andy). At kernel summit we concluded that we want to use the same code on all platforms, whereever possible, so having a dummy dma_op might be the easiest solution to keep virtio-ccw as similar as possible to

here is the 2nd version of providing an DMA API for s390. There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well as some attempts to make virtio use the dma API (Andy). At kernel summit we concluded that we want to use the same code on all platforms, whereever possible, so having a dummy dma_op might be the easiest solution to keep virtio-ccw as similar as possible to

Andy, to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861: Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee: s390/dma: Allow

Andy, to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861: Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee: s390/dma: Allow

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:54:39 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. > Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices > now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use > the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without

On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:54:39 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. > Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices > now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use > the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without

As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without PCI support we also have to enable the DMA api with virtio. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at

As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without PCI support we also have to enable the DMA api with virtio. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at

As virtio-ccw will have dma ops, we can no longer default to the zPCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that does not specify a device specific one. To compile without PCI support we will enable HAS_DMA all the time, via the default config in lib/Kconfig.

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw will have dma ops, we can no longer default to the zPCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that does not specify a device specific one. To compile without PCI support we will

Hi all, this patch series enables xen-swiotlb on arm and arm64. It has been heavily reworked compared to the previous versions in order to achieve better performances and to address review comments. We are not using dma_mark_clean to ensure coherency anymore. We call the platform implementation of map_page and unmap_page. We assume that dom0 has been mapped 1:1 (physical address == machine

Hi, This is third approach (complete this time) for replacing struct dma_attrs with unsigned long. The main patch (2/45) doing the change is split into many subpatches for easier review (3-43). They should be squashed together when applying. *Important:* Patchset is *only* build tested on allyesconfigs: ARM, ARM64, i386, x86_64 and powerpc. Please provide reviewes and tests for other

Hi, This is fifth approach for replacing struct dma_attrs with unsigned long. The main patch (1/44) doing the change is split into many subpatches for easier review (2-42). They should be squashed together when applying. Rebased on v4.7-rc5. For easier testing the patchset is available here: repo: https://github.com/krzk/linux branch: for-next/dma-attrs-const-v5 Changes since v4

Hi all, Here''s a work in progress series whcih does a partial revert of the previous swiotlb changes, and does a partial replacement with Becky Bruce''s series. The most important difference is Becky''s use of phys_addr_t rather than page+offset to represent arbitrary pages. This turns out to be simpler. I didn''t replicate the map_single_page changes, since