similar to: [PATCHv2 0/3] dma ops and virtio

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "[PATCHv2 0/3] dma ops and virtio"

2015 Nov 05
5
[GIT PULL v4 0/3] dma and virtio prep patches
Andy, to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861: Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee: s390/dma: Allow
2015 Nov 05
5
[GIT PULL v4 0/3] dma and virtio prep patches
Andy, to make it obvious which version is the latest, here is a branch The following changes since commit 6a13feb9c82803e2b815eca72fa7a9f5561d7861: Linux 4.3 (2015-11-01 16:05:25 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux.git dma for you to fetch changes up to fc7f9754db6ce0c12281da4055281f731d36bdee: s390/dma: Allow
2015 Nov 03
5
[PATCHv3 0/3] dma ops and virtio
Andy, this is the next and hopefully last version. Seems to work fine when replacing the previous patches in your tree. I have some reviews/acks for patch 2 and 3. patch 1 still needs one ack. Can you replace the patches in your tree and carry them along with your changes? old introduction: ----- There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well as some attempts to make virtio use
2015 Nov 03
5
[PATCHv3 0/3] dma ops and virtio
Andy, this is the next and hopefully last version. Seems to work fine when replacing the previous patches in your tree. I have some reviews/acks for patch 2 and 3. patch 1 still needs one ack. Can you replace the patches in your tree and carry them along with your changes? old introduction: ----- There are some attempts to unify the dma ops (Christoph) as well as some attempts to make virtio use
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 01
14
[PATCH v6 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Jan 29
18
[PATCH v5 00/10] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 03
14
[PATCH v7 0/9] virtio DMA API, yet again
This switches virtio to use the DMA API on Xen and if requested by module option. This fixes virtio on Xen, and it should break anything because it's off by default on everything except Xen PV on x86. To the Xen people: is this okay? If it doesn't work on other Xen variants (PVH? HVM?), can you submit follow-up patches to fix it? To everyone else: we've waffled on this for way too
2016 Feb 01
0
[PATCH v6 3/9] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> As virtio-ccw will have dma ops, we can no longer default to the zPCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that does not specify a device specific one. To compile without PCI support we will
2015 Oct 30
0
[PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without PCI support we also have to enable the DMA api with virtio. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at
2015 Nov 03
2
[PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:54:39 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. > Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices > now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use > the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without
2015 Nov 03
2
[PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:54:39 +0100 Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> wrote: > As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. > Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices > now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use > the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without
2015 Nov 03
0
[PATCH 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
As virtio-ccw now has dma ops, we can no longer default to the PCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that is not PCI. To compile without PCI support we also have to enable the DMA api with virtio. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at
2015 Nov 05
0
[GIT PULL v4 3/3] s390/dma: Allow per device dma ops
As virtio-ccw will have dma ops, we can no longer default to the zPCI ones. Make use of dev_archdata to keep the dma_ops per device. The pci devices now use that to override the default, and the default is changed to use the noop ops for everything that does not specify a device specific one. To compile without PCI support we will enable HAS_DMA all the time, via the default config in lib/Kconfig.
2013 Oct 17
42
[PATCH v8 0/19] enable swiotlb-xen on arm and arm64
Hi all, this patch series enables xen-swiotlb on arm and arm64. It has been heavily reworked compared to the previous versions in order to achieve better performances and to address review comments. We are not using dma_mark_clean to ensure coherency anymore. We call the platform implementation of map_page and unmap_page. We assume that dom0 has been mapped 1:1 (physical address == machine
2016 Jun 02
52
[RFC v3 00/45] dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs
Hi, This is third approach (complete this time) for replacing struct dma_attrs with unsigned long. The main patch (2/45) doing the change is split into many subpatches for easier review (3-43). They should be squashed together when applying. *Important:* Patchset is *only* build tested on allyesconfigs: ARM, ARM64, i386, x86_64 and powerpc. Please provide reviewes and tests for other
2014 Aug 27
1
virtio DMA API?
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 20:40 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > This has long been a source of contention. virtio assumes that > the hypervisor can decode guest-physical addresses. > > PowerPC, in particular, doesn't want to pay the cost of IOMMU > manipulations, and all arguments presented so far for using an IOMMU for > a virtio device are
2014 Aug 27
1
virtio DMA API?
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 20:40 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote: > Hi Andy, > > This has long been a source of contention. virtio assumes that > the hypervisor can decode guest-physical addresses. > > PowerPC, in particular, doesn't want to pay the cost of IOMMU > manipulations, and all arguments presented so far for using an IOMMU for > a virtio device are