similar to: [RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme"

2015 Sep 10
5
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > As title said, request for your comments. > > > > Play it in Qemu with: > > -drive
2015 Sep 10
5
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > As title said, request for your comments. > > > > Play it in Qemu with: > > -drive
2015 Sep 11
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:48 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > >> > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > >> > basically
2015 Sep 11
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:48 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > >> > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > >> > basically
2015 Sep 17
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > >
2015 Sep 17
2
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > >
2015 Sep 17
1
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, Hi Nic, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >> > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to
2015 Sep 17
1
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab at linux-iscsi.org> wrote: > Hi Ming & Co, Hi Nic, > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: >> On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >> > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to
2010 Jun 08
3
Matrix to "database" -- best practices/efficiency?
I have a matrix of, say, M and N dimensions: my_matrix=matrix(c(1:60),nrow=6,ncol=10) I have two "id" vectors corresponding to the rows and columns, e.g.: id_m=seq(10,60,by=10) id_n=seq(100,1000,by=100) I would like to create a "proper" database (let's say a data.frame for this example -- i'm going to be loading these into an SQLite database, but we'll leave
2015 Nov 18
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] Google extension to improve qemu-nvme performance
Hi Rob & Mihai, I wrote vhost-nvme patches on top of Christoph's NVMe target. vhost-nvme still uses mmio. So the guest OS can run unmodified NVMe driver. But the tests I have done didn't show competitive performance compared to virtio-blk/virtio-scsi. The bottleneck is in mmio. Your nvme vendor extension patches reduces greatly the number of MMIO writes. So I'd like to push it
2015 Nov 18
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] Google extension to improve qemu-nvme performance
Hi Rob & Mihai, I wrote vhost-nvme patches on top of Christoph's NVMe target. vhost-nvme still uses mmio. So the guest OS can run unmodified NVMe driver. But the tests I have done didn't show competitive performance compared to virtio-blk/virtio-scsi. The bottleneck is in mmio. Your nvme vendor extension patches reduces greatly the number of MMIO writes. So I'd like to push it
2008 Jul 06
2
lattice question
I'm creating a lattice barchart based off a pretty complicated data structure. The barchart comes out quite nice ( thanks to lattice ) but the problem is that the horizontal axis comes out all scrunched because the barchart doesn't know that the intervals of Var.1 are really "associated" with the conditioning variable Var.2. Therefore, all the intervals of Var.1 are put on
2007 Jul 27
1
Is FUSE enabled in centos5 ?
Hello, I noticed FUSE is not there by default disabled on centos 5. Is there a separate RPM that includes FUSE module for the same kernel as of centos 5 ?. I have installed the latest centos 5 update, don't see FUSE enabled . [root at xx]# pwd /lib/modules/2.6.18-8.1.8.el5/source [root at xx]# grep FUSE .config # CONFIG_FUSE_FS is not set [root at xx]# I checked both addons and
2007 Jul 27
0
centos5: NFS panic during unmount
Hello, Just noticed a NFS panic on centos5 (no updates applied yet). I don't have the serial console attached yet to get the exact stack. However, here is the stack: shrink_dcache_for_umount generic_shutdown_super kill_anon_super nfs_kill_super deactivate_super mntput_no_expire do_exit sys_exit_group
2015 Sep 10
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > As title said, request for your comments. > > Play it in Qemu with: > -drive file=disk.img,format=raw,if=none,id=D22 \ > -device virtio-nvme-pci,drive=D22,serial=1234,num_queues=4 >
2015 Sep 11
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >> > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, >> > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. >> > >> > As title said,
2015 Sep 11
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 08:48 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >> > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: >>
2015 Sep 18
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Hi Ming & Co, > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > >
2015 Sep 17
0
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
Hi Ming & Co, On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin at kernel.org> wrote: > > > These 2 patches added virtio-nvme to kernel and qemu, > > > basically modified from virtio-blk and nvme code. > > > > > > As title said,
2015 Sep 18
3
[RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio nvme
On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 17:55 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 16:31 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 23:10 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > > Hi Ming & Co, > > > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 10:28 -0700, Ming Lin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:38 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > >