similar to: VIRTIO v1.0 15-day public review - ends July 2nd

----- Forwarded message from Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> ----- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:54:16 -0400 From: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> To: tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org, members at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-comment at lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [members] 15-day Public Review for Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO)

----- Forwarded message from Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> ----- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:54:16 -0400 From: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> To: tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org, members at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-comment at lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [members] 15-day Public Review for Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO)

OASIS members and other interested parties, The OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC members [1] have produced an updated Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 15-day public review: Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) Version 1.0 Committee Specification Draft 05 / Public Review Draft 05 29 October 2015 Specification Overview: This document describes the

OASIS members and other interested parties, The OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC members [1] have produced an updated Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 15-day public review: Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) Version 1.0 Committee Specification Draft 05 / Public Review Draft 05 29 October 2015 Specification Overview: This document describes the

Season's greetings all: The OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC [1] members have recently approved a Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 30-day(*) public review: Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) Version 1.0 Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01 03 December 2013 Specification Overview: This document describes the specifications of the

Season's greetings all: The OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC [1] members have recently approved a Committee Specification Draft (CSD) and submitted this specification for 30-day(*) public review: Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) Version 1.0 Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01 03 December 2013 Specification Overview: This document describes the specifications of the

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:37:57PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 02/08/2017 04:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > [...] > > * Prototype > > > > A partial prototype can be found under > > tools/virtio/ringtest/ring.c > > > > Test run: > > [mst at tuck ringtest]$ time ./ring > > real 0m0.399s > > user 0m0.791s > >

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:37:57PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 02/08/2017 04:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > [...] > > * Prototype > > > > A partial prototype can be found under > > tools/virtio/ringtest/ring.c > > > > Test run: > > [mst at tuck ringtest]$ time ./ring > > real 0m0.399s > > user 0m0.791s > >

Hi Michael, > -----Original Message----- > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v3 > [...] > *

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtualization at

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:11:57AM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: > Hi Michael, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2017 1:06 PM > > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtualization at

Michael, Would you please give an example or two how these two flags DESC_DRIVER and DESC_WRAP are used together? Like others, I am confused by the description and still don?t quite grok it. Steven On 9/25/17, 3:24 PM, "virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Michael S. Tsirkin" <virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of mst at redhat.com> wrote: On Wed, Sep

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 17:29:55 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:54:39AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 13:37:39 +0900 > > Namhyung Kim <namhyung at kernel.org> wrote: > > > +#define VIRT_PSTORE_ORDER 2 > > > +#define VIRT_PSTORE_BUFSIZE (4096 << VIRT_PSTORE_ORDER) > >

On 02/08/2017 04:20 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: [...] > * Prototype > > A partial prototype can be found under > tools/virtio/ringtest/ring.c > > Test run: > [mst at tuck ringtest]$ time ./ring > real 0m0.399s > user 0m0.791s > sys 0m0.000s > [mst at tuck ringtest]$ time ./virtio_ring_0_9 > real 0m0.503s > user 0m0.999s > sys

On 2017?09?10? 13:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This is an update from v2 version. > Changes: > - update event suppression mechanism > - add wrap counter: DESC_WRAP flag in addition to > DESC_DRIVER flag used for validity so device does not have to > write out all used descriptors. Do we have benchmark result to show the advantage of DESC_DRIVER over e.g avail/used

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:08:24AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > This is v2 of the virtio-pstore work. In this patchset I addressed > most of feedbacks from previous version. Limiting disk size is not > implemented yet. For some reason, only parts of the patchset were received. Pls post all patches to all lists. If you are changing the virtio interface with host, like

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:44:26PM +0800, Liang Li wrote: > Extend the virtio balloon device to support a new feature, this > new feature can help to get guest's free pages information, which > can be used for live migration optimzation. > > Signed-off-by: Liang Li <liang.z.li at intel.com> I don't understand why we need a new interface. Balloon already sends free

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:59:03PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:24:34AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:57:14AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > In commit 1a937693993f ("virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk"), > > > you added a new feature bit

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:59:03PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 07:24:34AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:57:14AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > In commit 1a937693993f ("virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk"), > > > you added a new feature bit

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:57:14AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Michael, > > In commit 1a937693993f ("virtio: new feature to detect IOMMU device quirk"), > you added a new feature bit (VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM) to describe whether > or not a given virtio device requires physical address or bus addresses. > > Is there a plan to get this incorporated into the virtio