Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "current state of pxelinux for UEFI..."
2019 Nov 08
1
current state of pxelinux for UEFI...
On 8 Nov 2019 at 0:42, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
> As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same
> platform (bios/ia32/x64).
>
I keep versions strictly separated. Both the build directories under
/usr/src/syslinux-<VERSION>, and under
/tftpboot/pxelinux/<VERSION>/efi64/<my data>
and I flip the "filename" and
2019 Nov 14
2
current state of pxelinux for UEFI...
If they are useful, then one should note where they can be found
and how to extract them for anyone not using a Debian-based distro.
Saying just that they are in the Debian Testing repo, doesn't mean
much to a non-Debian-er...
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 09:50:40PM +0000, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> > Do note that not everyone is running a Debian based system,
> > so "the
2019 Jun 08
2
PXELINUX gets stuck when receiving non-PXE traffic
On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
>> the PXELINUX log line is
>> printed (PXELINUX 6.04 lwIP 6.04-pre3 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 H. Peter
>> Anvin et al),
>
> (snip)
>
> FWIW, the official binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 are not good
> for troubleshooting.
>
> Is the same behavior present when testing with other versions? I would
2019 Oct 01
4
syslinux.efi and vendor-class-identifier
We've been successfully installing Linux using pxelinux to bootstrap our
Linux (CentOS) installs for many years, but we are about to take
delivery of hardware that doesn't have legacy BIOS boot support for
internal drives - so I'm making my first foray into the world of EFI -
and can _almost_ get it all to work, but hit an issue that I'm not sure
how to 'fix' ...
2019 Oct 07
5
syslinux.efi and vendor-class-identifier
Gene Cumm wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:47 AM James Pearson via Syslinux
> <syslinux at syslinux.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>>>
>>>> We're using a CentOS 6 server running its native (ISC) dhcpd (v4.1.1)
>>>> and tftpd (v 0.49). I've installed syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64 from the
>>>>
2019 Oct 04
2
syslinux.efi and vendor-class-identifier
Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
>> We're using a CentOS 6 server running its native (ISC) dhcpd (v4.1.1)
>> and tftpd (v 0.49). I've installed syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64 from the
>> syslinux-6.04-pre2 distro alongside the existing pxelinux.0
>
>
> Please avoid the official binaries from Syslinux 6.04-pre2 and
> 6.04-pre3. Additionally, the current git
2024 Jan 21
1
Running VMware ESXi network installer via syslinux/menu
On 1/20/2024 1:29 AM, Ralph Ronnquist via Syslinux wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:21:37AM +0100, marki via Syslinux wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> So I'm running syslinux.efi
>> Which loads menu.c32
>> Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi
>>
>> But that gives
>>
>> """
>> Loading mboot.efi... ok
2019 Nov 14
2
current state of pxelinux for UEFI...
Do note that not everyone is running a Debian based system,
so "the current Debian Testing binary packages" are worthless to us.
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:42:45AM +0000, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
> > Any response would be welcome :-)
>
>
> As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same
> platform (bios/ia32/x64).
>
> Currently,
2019 Nov 08
1
current state of pxelinux for UEFI...
Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
> As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same
> platform (bios/ia32/x64).
>
> Currently, the Syslinux-related binary packages in Debian are:
>
> _ extlinux
> _ isolinux
> _ pxelinux
> _ syslinux
> _ syslinux-common
> _ syslinux-efi
> _ syslinux-utils
>
> The list of packages and their
2024 Jan 20
1
Running VMware ESXi network installer via syslinux/menu
On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:21:37AM +0100, marki via Syslinux wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So I'm running syslinux.efi
> Which loads menu.c32
> Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi
>
> But that gives
>
> """
> Loading mboot.efi... ok
> Invalid Boot signature 0x2, bailing out
> Booting kernel failed: Bad file number
>
2020 Jun 22
4
Boot Loop in efi
Thanks for the hints - I have NOT CONFIG_EFI enabled - do I need this actually?
I do not know which variables I need to boot... The kernel APPEND parameters are
sufficient for me...
And the relocatable config is set already.
.. I enabled the EFI kernel config parts - no change... the console prints:
Booting System...
Loading linux... ok
Loading iramfs.gz...ok
[then reboot]
My syslinux.cfg is
2019 Sep 27
2
Syslinux and EFI
Hi good day, can anybody please assist me to get PXE booting with
syslinux, and EFI systems. PXE EFI Architecture-7 (64bit)?
What I have tried:
1) Syslinux 6.03 -> Looks like a bug -> does not work because
syslinux.efi tries to download ldlinux.e64 but from the DHCP server, in
stead of the PXE boot server (the server that provided "option 60" and
the boot file
2018 Dec 03
2
fixing debian's hd-media image
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:02 AM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote:
>
> > Now it is just dd, mkfs and copy in the files we need.
> > One less thing to worry about keeping versions consistent.
>
>
> > > > I just noticed those 2 files that were added by
> > > > syslinux -i boot.img
> > > > (right?)
> > >
>
2019 Sep 19
2
isolinux 6.04-pre3-3-g05ac953 - failed to load ldlinux.c32
Hi,
We have been using isolinux 3.75 for a while now, to support pxelinux
and UEFI we were going to update to 6.03, but seeing 6.04 has but
fixes, decided to go with 6.04-pre3. First, is that about read for a
"make official' ? Second, I did have to modify
gnu-efi/inc/efilinks.h for the build to complete (had to remove the
(intptr_t) which doesn't belong in EFI/EDK).
So I've
2024 Jan 19
2
Running VMware ESXi network installer via syslinux/menu
Hello,
So I'm running syslinux.efi
Which loads menu.c32
Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi
But that gives
"""
Loading mboot.efi... ok
Invalid Boot signature 0x2, bailing out
Booting kernel failed: Bad file number
"""
Secure boot is disabled.
Thoughts?
The reason why it would be nice using PXE and syslinux here is because
we have
2014 Dec 15
1
Using of pxelinux configfiles for both BIOS and UEFI boot
>>According to prior pcap reports, syslinux.efi searches for syslinux.cfg (too), while (l)pxelinux.0 will be searching for "default". >This means that using something *similar* to:
>> pxelinux.cfg/default:
>> PATH bios
>> CONFIG common-config.cfg ::bios
>> # the bios modules should be located in the bios subdir
>>
>>and
>>
2014 Dec 11
2
Using of pxelinux configfiles for both BIOS and UEFI boot
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Leenders, Peter
> <Peter.Leenders at computacenter.com> wrote:
>
> > This look promising, if I could separate the config files for the different
> > boot architectures Bios and UEFI. I have 2 different boot files in 2
> > different locations, but after startup they both refer to the
> > tftproot/pxlinux.cfg/default config
2019 Jun 06
2
PXELINUX gets stuck when receiving non-PXE traffic
Hey,
I am running a custom-built router (based on a PCengines apu2c4 board, see
https://github.com/rtr7/router7 for details) on which I am using PXE boot
for recovery purposes, i.e. reverting to an older version of the
software/configuration. In this scenario, my workstation acts as the DHCP,
TFTP and HTTP server, and my router PXE boots into a recovery program.
I have noticed a couple of times
2014 Dec 12
0
Using of pxelinux configfiles for both BIOS and UEFI boot
>I could be wrong about this, but... I think that it could still be possible to get multiple architectures / firmwares mixed together >while using c32 modules, without dhcp options, and perhaps even without applying pxelinux-options.
>
>If I understood correctly, this tftp server can choose between 2 boot files, depending on BIOS/UEFI client, and the problem is >choosing a
2019 Oct 07
3
syslinux.efi and vendor-class-identifier
Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote:
>
>> However, I have just tested the exact same boot procedure using a Dell
>> laptop (Latitude 7480) - and it all worked without a problem - that is,
>> syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64 were downloaded without a problem - and
>> from a tcpdump, there was *no* DHCP transaction between downloading
>> syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64
>>