similar to: Latest Testing Version

hi i'm about to upgrade systems. yesterday i got https://www.zytor.com/pub/syslinux/Testing/6.04/syslinux-6.04-pre3.tar.xz in order to upgrade 6.04-pre1 version. i first was upgrading a usb-disk which was booting smootly with a simple configuration. i changed the EFI installation in /EFI/BOOT: efi64/efi/syslinux.efi (UEFI bootloader for EFI X64 (x86_64) firmware) ?

Hi hpa, Ady, hpa at zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) writes: > On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> >>> the PXELINUX log line is >>> printed (PXELINUX 6.04 lwIP 6.04-pre3 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 H. Peter >>> Anvin et al), >> >> (snip) >> >> FWIW, the official binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 are not good >> for

Hi,, I wud just like to inform that the previous issue of memdisk not booting compressed images still persists !! The release 2.05 that was supposed to fix this issue dint yet solve the problem !! Please, let me know if more info on the problem is required !! Bye, Jassi >From: syslinux-request at zytor.com >Reply-To: syslinux at zytor.com >To: syslinux at zytor.com >Subject:

Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same > platform (bios/ia32/x64). > > Currently, the Syslinux-related binary packages in Debian are: > > _ extlinux > _ isolinux > _ pxelinux > _ syslinux > _ syslinux-common > _ syslinux-efi > _ syslinux-utils > > The list of packages and their

Okay, thanks. I just tried 6.01-pre1, downloading the .xz file. But that won't build because the gnu-efi directory is empty. ?? On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 9:29 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at syslinux.org> wrote: > > > fixes, decided to go with 6.04-pre3. First, is that about read for a > > > Please try either 6.04-pre1, or the current (binary) packages from

On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> the PXELINUX log line is >> printed (PXELINUX 6.04 lwIP 6.04-pre3 Copyright (C) 1994-2015 H. Peter >> Anvin et al), > > (snip) > > FWIW, the official binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3 are not good > for troubleshooting. > > Is the same behavior present when testing with other versions? I would

I've been working with Matt Burgess here on this problem, and have found the following: syslinux 3.08-pre10 ? broken >>> config.inc:max_cmd_len=255 syslinux 3.08-pre11 ? works >>> config.inc:max_cmd_len=1023 syslinux 3.08 ? works >>> config.inc:max_cmd_len=1023 syslinux 3.09-pre1 ? works >>> config.inc:max_cmd_len=1023 syslinux 3.09-pre2 ? broken

On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 04:26:19PM +0000, Patrick Welche via Syslinux wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 04:15:48PM +0000, Patrick Welche via Syslinux wrote: > > I just idly git cloned head and roughly compiled it on a stock ubuntu 18 box. > > Using the generated pxelinux.0 and ldlinux.c32, I see > > > > "Failed to load ldlinux.c32" > > > > If I

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 11:16 AM, <mikezb at softhome.net> wrote: > Gene Cumm: > ______________________________________________________________________ >> >> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 9:30 AM, <mikezb at softhome.net> wrote: >>> >>> Gene Cumm: >>>> Please use reply all. OP is a non-subscriber. >>>>

On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 9:30 AM, <mikezb at softhome.net> wrote: > Gene Cumm: >> >> Please use reply all. OP is a non-subscriber. >> ______________________________________________________________________ >> Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 3:26 AM, mikezb (via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com>) >> wrote: >>> >>> I recommend someone verify that

On 07/05/2013 01:01 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Hello > > With 4.06 this works fine all times. But with versions 5.1x-preX and > 6.0x-preX, 6.01) does not work, random errors or nothing shows > (netconn_write error -5), random behaviour. Only few times works > (1/50...). Note that retriving files via TFTP works perfect in all cases. > > This happens using

> Do note that not everyone is running a Debian based system, > so "the current Debian Testing binary packages" are worthless to us. Debian's packages can be downloaded and used by anyone, even without having Debian as OS. Even Windows' users can do it. That's similar to downloading and using the upstream archive of Syslinux, whichever OS you are using. The

I have released a SYSLINUX 2.06-pre3. This includes modifications to ppmtolss16 so that it should now be completely compliant with all modes of the PNM specification, raw/plain, PBM/PGM/PPM, with comment lines or without. ftp://ftp.zytor.com/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/Testing/ Please test it out ASAP if at all possible. Since the fixes for -pre1 and -pre2 were pretty essential, I'd like

> 2) Syslinux? 6.04-pre3 -> Works better but still I get stuck as follows... Please avoid official upstream binaries from 6.04-pre2 and 6.04-pre3. Please try with official 6.04-pre1, or (even better) Debian Sid's Syslinux-related binary packages. Please avoid mixing versions of binaries; when using syslinux.efi 6.04-pre1, use also the same version for the corresponding modules

> I built development version of syslinux from git 6.04-pre3-3-(sometag) > and I am trying to boot a slackware-current system with it. I do not > use a separated partition for `/boot`. It's just `/dev/sda1` here for > `/` and `/boot` is just a folder. I simply use `mbr.bin` against a DOS > partition table and the first partition having the bootable flag. > > With this

Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > >> We're using a CentOS 6 server running its native (ISC) dhcpd (v4.1.1) >> and tftpd (v 0.49). I've installed syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64 from the >> syslinux-6.04-pre2 distro alongside the existing pxelinux.0 > > > Please avoid the official binaries from Syslinux 6.04-pre2 and > 6.04-pre3. Additionally, the current git

Do note that not everyone is running a Debian based system, so "the current Debian Testing binary packages" are worthless to us. On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 12:42:45AM +0000, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > Any response would be welcome :-) > > > As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same > platform (bios/ia32/x64). > > Currently,

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:29 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > > _ target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG > > > > I don't think that exists? (see list below) > > > In our "first test" (simple boot prompt), we created > "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG". In our "second test" we _added_ >

Folks, I've just released the first prelease for the 5.10 series. The intention is to leave 5.02-pre3 where it is and move to 5.10-pre1. The only difference between 5.02-pre3 and 5.10-pre1 is the merge of the lwip branch (and a single commit to fixup the -DDEBUG=2 build), which warranted a bump in the version minor number. See the shortlog below for details of the differences between

On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 7:47 AM James Pearson via Syslinux <syslinux at syslinux.org> wrote: > > Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > > >> We're using a CentOS 6 server running its native (ISC) dhcpd (v4.1.1) > >> and tftpd (v 0.49). I've installed syslinux.efi and ldlinux.e64 from the > >> syslinux-6.04-pre2 distro alongside the existing pxelinux.0