similar to: New UEFI restrictions?

When a USBstiked-syslinux starts, it's the PC's firmare that's reading the USB ? But once the USBsyslinux takes over, has IT also got a USB driver? Since my MotherBoard & 2009 Slackware built USBstik syslinux booter were stolen I bought a <WinTel> laptop and USBextender to access my old IDE & SATA disks. With WinTel's new arrangement of not allowing the tail of the

> I don't think that syslinux be in concern here. If I understand well > Slackware is installed on a hard disk partition that you want to access > through the USB-adaptor to IDE/SATA. No. I'm not married to Slak. It's important to distinguish between verbatim/pasteable and what the old-writer merely thinks/remembers. I want to be able to boot ANY installation/partition as I

On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 7:45 AM, eas lab via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: >>Do you mean boot SYSLINUX from stik-A but then load files like a >>kernel/initrd from stikB:partition5? It's possible but only from a >>development version of Syslinux that has the multifs patch merged. > > Yes: before my x86MotherBoard & <syslinux>USBstik were stolen,

Yes this is the SAME question, that I can't get an answer from a month ago! I have the files, from a USBstik [now stolen] which I previously could edit at boot time, to boot any of my IDE or SATA partitions. Now, with a laptop, I want to boot the same IDE or SATA via a USB-adaptor to IDE/SATA. And also I want to boot a Toshiba 500GB USB disk. The obvious question is: why [if] the old system

I've been using linux:TC from a USBstik in order to not break the M$ capability, as previously always happened. Since TC runs in RAM, it has many extra problems; like reinstalling all the apps and your private settings at each boot. The sample isolinux.cfg which I've been emailed by the oficianado is very unfamiliar and worrying. Where is the official syntax ? -- Without knowing if/how

When a USBstiked-syslinux starts, it's the PC's firmare that's reading the USB ?. But once the USBsyslinux takes over, has IT also got a USB driver? So that USBsyslinux can install a different USBstik/partition? Ie. boot with stikA to install & run stikB:partition5 ? ------------ Is the following sound logic? > Do zero out the partition table first so you don't

>Do you mean boot SYSLINUX from stik-A but then load files like a >kernel/initrd from stikB:partition5? It's possible but only from a >development version of Syslinux that has the multifs patch merged. Yes: before my x86MotherBoard & <syslinux>USBstik were stolen, I could edit the <syslinux prompt> to boot to different partitions of the attatched IDE & SATA. Now

I want to be able to make a USBbootStik for my laptop, as I repeatedly did for the now stolen PC. I've got a copy of the required 2009, Slackware13 partition, saved to a USBdisk. And I've located the 175-line: <make bootStik script> . Of course just "chroot"ing Slak13, won't allow <make bootStik>. But why can't someone here, provide the info to make an

AIM: from <isolinux> on USBstikA, boot Debian7 installation on USBstikB. EXISTING STATE: USBstikA is TinyCore64bit booter, with:- /boot/isolinux/* 61312 Oct 26 2016 menu.c32 24576 Oct 26 2016 isolinux.bin 2069 Nov 22 01:24 isolinux.cfg ... USBstikB-partition3: Currently boots a 32bit installation, via GRUB using the entry:----- menuentry 'Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux

I am trying to install R-2.3.0 on a 64bit linux box and encounter several error during the make step. I'd appreciate any help. Error messages follow: [root at calculon R-2.3.0]# make make[4]: Entering directory `/state/partition1/apps/packages/R-2.3.0/src/modules/lapack' gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o libRlapack.so dlamc.o dlapack0.o dlapack1.o dlapack2.o dlapack3.o cmplx.o

My previous question: "can syslinux on a USBstik also boot installations on other USB devices ?" got no proper reply, so I'm now including more background detail. The new problem is that my 32bit partition of ETHOberon, only gives a proper font-size under Debian7:DVDinstaller:rescueMode, since I'm forced to use a laptop, after my previous systems were stolen. Neither gnome nor

--- tests/functions.sh.in | 17 ++++++++++++++++- tests/test-memory-largest.sh | 8 ++------ tests/test-partition1.sh | 22 ++++------------------ tests/test-partition2.sh | 6 +----- tests/test-pattern-largest.sh | 8 ++------ 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/functions.sh.in b/tests/functions.sh.in index 35647f7..97afbbf 100644 ---

On 8 Nov 2019 at 0:42, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > As usual, builds/versions should not be mixed, at least within the same > platform (bios/ia32/x64). > I keep versions strictly separated. Both the build directories under /usr/src/syslinux-<VERSION>, and under /tftpboot/pxelinux/<VERSION>/efi64/<my data> and I flip the "filename" and

Test the partition filter against real life partition tables created by sfdisk. --- tests/test-partition.c | 101 ------------------------ README | 2 + tests/Makefile.am | 7 +- tests/test-partition1.sh | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/test-partition.c b/tests/test-partition.c

Dear all, I wrote a function test1 in test1.R. Right, I am writing another function test2 on test2.R and trying to use test1 function. How can I do? Is there any similar way like including test1.R in test2.R file? Thank You Very Much. Jia-Ming ============================ $BD%2HLC(B Jia-Ming Chang PhD Student Comparative Bioinformatics Group Bioinformatics and Genomics Programme Centre

Hello, I have a lot of domains in a mail server, so I make a balanced allocation of mailboxes in the storage disks. That improves performance of access to records. Therefore, I want to overwrite 'mail_location' directive for each user. But I also want to use the modifier 'H' to spray the mailboxes of the same partition in a hash. Then, each user has your own

Hi, we are operating the IT of a small non-profit organization with a Samba server (2.2.5) and roughly 15 Win2k workstations. Everything works fine so far but one single issue: Printing messages from Outlook Express: only the header of the mail is printed, no single line of the body. All the domain users are standard-users (I'm not sure about the correct English wording, may be someone

I think this is likely a bug with either mount or glusterfs: [root at vm-container-0-0 ~]# cat /etc/fstab LABEL=/ / ext3 defaults 1 1 LABEL=/state/partition /state/partition1 ext3 defaults 1 2 LABEL=/var /var ext3 defaults 1 2 tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs defaults

I have 4 systems and each one of them has a partition I'd like to be remotely accessible on the other 3 systems. In other words System1 has Partition1. Systems 2,3,4 should be able to remotely mount Partition1 from System1. Also System2 has Partition2. Then systems 1,3,4 should be able to remotely mount Partition2 from System2 and so on. I tried NFS and it works but only in the ideal

I want to write a function to plot a picture for each inputting file like the following example. plot_test <- function(f1,f2) { } However, -- Jia-Ming ============================ $BD%2HLC(B Jia-Ming Chang PhD Student Comparative Bioinformatics Group Bioinformatics and Genomics Programme Centre de Regulacio Genomica (CRG) Dr. Aiguader, 88 08003 Barcelona Spain E-Mail: