similar to: [PATCH 1/2] Add fabs() implementation

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[PATCH 1/2] Add fabs() implementation"

2016 Oct 19
4
[PATCH] Fix for crash with certain EFIs
Hi Ady, Would it work if we removed "ifdef EFI_BUILD" condition and just add -mno-red-zone for all x86_64 builds? If not, do you have any ideas how to pass this flag? This could work, because the patch is adding the -mno-red-zone flag only for x86_64 builds, which are only used in the form of the efi64 target. The efi32 and bios targets are both 32-bit. BTW. I also tried 6.04-pre1 and
2015 Nov 27
8
[PATCH 0/2] Do not use the "red zone" on EFI
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> The System V ABI for x86-64 specify that a "red zone" is an area of 128 bytes above the current stack frame. This area can be used by a called function in order to avoid the overhead of modifying the stack pointer. The direct effect is that interrupt/event/signal handlers must not write to this area. In the UEFI calling convention,
2011 Apr 16
6
[PATCH 0/6] Makefile cleanups
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at linux.intel.com> This series includes a patch (PATCH 1/6) that I sent previously but I thought it was worth sending it again since the rest of the series depends on it, and it also gives a bit of context. These cleanups make it simpler to do the big switchover to ELF modules on the elflink branch because the libraries in $LIBS are now contained in one
2020 Jul 28
1
[PATCH] mk/efi: add -znoseparate-code to LD_FLAGS for EFI builds
More recent versions of the GNU linker (>= 2.31) create a separate code "PT_LOAD" segment by default (as of https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=f6aec96dce1ddbd8961a3aa8a2925db2021719bb). Building syslinux EFI images with this -zseparate-code enabled creates broken EFI images, since efi/wrapper.c only copies the first PT_LOAD segment to the EFI. This patch adds
2015 Feb 20
6
[PATCH 0/1] EFI image booting capabilities
This patch adds to the core EFI image booting capabilities. It was tested on VMware EFI clients and HP Elitebook EFI notebooks, only on PXE environments but it should work on non-PXE scenarios as well. Feedback appreciated. Best, Patrick Signed-off-by: Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> --- diff -uprN a/com32/elflink/ldlinux/execute.c b/com32/elflink/ldlinux/execute.c ---
2015 Sep 14
11
[PATCH 0/4] efi: Makefile improvement
From: Sylvain Gault <sylvain.gault at gmail.com> These few patches contain a few improvement about the Makefiles for EFI. Mainly, to rebuild the files when needed, and only when needed. The three shell scripts efi/{check,build,clean}-gnu-efi.sh disappeared and are now integrated as makefile recipes. You'll notice an argument ARFLAGS=rvU to the recursive make calls to gnu-efi. This is
2016 Oct 20
0
[PATCH] Fix for crash with certain EFIs
Thank you all. It looks like -mno-red-zone flag is already in master branch since commit 7d70885d, but it seems it is applied to all EFI builds. IIUC, the problem only affects efi64 builds. So here's the modification of my patch to only apply -mno-red-zone flag to efi64 target. The patch is against master. I verified that it builds correctly in master. Please feel free to accept or reject
2016 Oct 17
1
[PATCH] Fix for crash with certain EFIs
Hello syslinux maintainers, I came across the issue of syslinux crashing with some EFIs in the UEFI boot mode. Upon closer investigation it turned out that most object files which go into syslinux efi64 are compiled with the so-called red zone. Some EFIs follow Windows ABI more strictly and cause syslinux to crash due to stack overwrite. Looking at mk/efi.mk there was a previous attempt to fix
2015 Mar 14
0
[PATCH 0/1] EFI access from Com32 modules
This patch adds to Com32 modules the capabilities of accessing the EFI environment The idea is simple, the EFI parameters "image" and "table" received by syslinux.efi's efi_main() are stored in the "firmware" structure, next they are retrieved from the Com32 module which is linked against the gnu-efi static library. The Com32 module can use the EFI
2014 May 12
2
compile error about 6.0.2
It's x86 arch.The reason of compiling pxelinux only is that i want to add tcp support, not http and ftp. ? 2014-05-08 18:09:15?"Gene Cumm" <gene.cumm at gmail.com> ??? On May 7, 2014 11:54 PM, "??" <muliu92 at 163.com> wrote: > make[4]: Entering directory `/mlsyslinux/bios/com32/libupload' > gcc -Wp,-MT,cpio.o,-MD,./.cpio.o.d -std=gnu99 -m32
2008 Sep 26
3
SYSLINUX 3.72 released
Well, it has to happen at some point, so I have officially pushed out SYSLINUX 3.72. The big news in this release is of course the ISOLINUX hybrid mode support (a single image which can be booted either from a CD-ROM or from a hard disk/USB stick), but there are plenty of more goodies in here, including the label listing (not technically completion) on the Tab key. As usual, huge thanks to
2011 May 25
1
[GIT PULL] elflink ldlinux
Hi, These patches contain support for some features that are already in Syslinux 4 but weren't working properly on the elflink branch. It's another step closer to feature parity with Syslinux 4. Having to jump through the comboot API for localboot support is less than ideal and I'll eventually fix that, probably when we move a big chunk of code from asm to C. Also, there's a
2014 May 08
2
compile error about 6.0.2
make -r -C /mlsyslinux -f /mlsyslinux/Makefile SRC="/mlsyslinux" \ OBJ=/mlsyslinux objdir=/mlsyslinux bios make[1]: Entering directory `/mlsyslinux' make -r -C /mlsyslinux/bios -f /mlsyslinux/Makefile SRC="/mlsyslinux" \ objdir=/mlsyslinux/bios OBJ=/mlsyslinux/bios HAVE_FIRMWARE=1 \ ARCH=i386 LDLINUX=ldlinux.c32 all make[2]:
2011 Apr 16
20
[PATCH 00/20] Switch to ELF modules
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at linux.intel.com> This series fixes some bugs and switches the elflink branch to be entirely ELF modules. It applies on top of, http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2011-April/016369.html The deletions in the diff stat below are mainly from deleting com32/elflink/modules (finally!). Now there should be no duplicate code because we don't need COM32 and
2008 Oct 14
2
SYSLINUX 3.73-pre3
I just pushed out SYSLINUX 3.73-pre3. The only significant difference over -pre2 was changing MEMDISK to use "safeint" by default. -hpa
2013 Aug 21
5
Build problems: klibc with Linux 3.10.7
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:44:39AM +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > > > Find attached two patches I have in order to build klibc 2.0.2 > against kernel 3.8.13 > We had to introduce those patches when going from kernel 3.6 to kernel 3.7 > Hope it helps. > those patches are wrong and again very brittle. just use the way it is described in `make help': A) cd ~/src/linux
2012 Mar 23
19
[PATCH 00/19][elflink] Improve compatibility with 4.x
From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming at intel.com> The following patch series is available at, git://git.zytor.com/users/mfleming/syslinux.git elflink All patches are against the 'elflink' branch. This series fixes a few serious bugs and some behavioural incompatibilities with the 4.x series. Matt Fleming (19): ldlinux: Initialise 'p' before using it. ldlinux: Parse
2006 Nov 20
1
compilation bug
Hello When i try to make world (any) from xen-3.0.2 to xen-unstable-src I gat following error : gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -m64 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix include -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe -I/home/test1/xen-unstable/xen/include
2020 Mar 27
2
[PATCH v2 1/5] Kbuild: add support for clang builds
From: Michael Davidson <md at google.com> Add cc-name to klibc/scripts/Kbuild.include. Make optimization flags not supported by clang conditional on cc-name. Don't use -nostdinc when building klibc. While klibc doesn't (shouldn't) use the standard header files supplied by the toolchain, it does still need to be able to find the compiler-specific header file
2013 Aug 21
3
Build problems: klibc with Linux 3.10.7
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:48:08PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:03:41PM +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > > > > Note that step B is working well. > > It is step C, the 'make install', which fails. > > right, it is the toplevel Makefile one needs to poke for the target. > see belows proper patch: >From