similar to: [PATCH] syslinux/com32: Fix the printing of left zero padded hexadecimals with a leading '0x'.

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:01:21AM +0000, Brett Walker via Syslinux wrote: > From: Brett Walker <brett.walker at geometry.com.au> > > When printing hexadecimal numbers to a fixed width, padded with leading zeros, > and also having a leading '0x'; the resultant string can be shortened by up to > two characters if any leading zero padding character required is. >

Dear R-help members, I'm processing a large amount of MODIS data where quality assessment information is stored as an integer value for each pixel. I have to converted this number to an 8 digit binary flag to get access to the stored quality code (e.g. in2bin(165,8) = 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1). Unfortunately, I did not manage to find a package providing a fast function to do so. I need to run

(RFC := Request For Comments) >>>>> "Tim" == Tim Keighley <Tim.Keighley@csiro.au> >>>>> on Thu, 23 Oct 2003 11:45:22 +1000 writes: Tim> Hi Martin, Tim> In October 2000 you wrote to r-help: >>> which reminds me that I've had a desire for something like >>> the old S function [from the blue book, and

Hi, I would like to convert a decimal into a binary number, for instance : 2->(1,0) Any one knows how to do that ? Thanks a lot paul --- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote: > 2 questions: > - Do you see this with the fresh llvm trunk? > - Can you prepare a minimized example? Pretty recent, I updated a couple days ago. I tried to minimize the attached but at the same time I didn't want to lose too many unions and casts in case it didn't trigger any more. $ clang

It would be really nice if nlm took a set of "..." optional arguments that were passed through to the objective function. This level of hacking is probably slightly beyond me: is there a reason it would be technically difficult/inefficient? (I have a vague memory that it used to work this way either in S-PLUS or in some previous version of R, but I could easily be wrong.) Here's

FYI, looks like support for Racoon is ending. Does anyone have any experience with the version in ipsec-tools ? ---Mike >Racoon users, > >This is the announcement that the kame project will quit providing >a key management daemon, the racoon, and that "ipsec-tools" will become >the formal team to release the racoon. >The final release of the racoon in the

Gracias a todos por las recomendaciones. Ya me he puesto en contacto con el autor y le explicado donde esta el error. Es tan fácil como que han cambiado la estructura de los objetos tipos lmer desde la versión 2.15.3 con lo que su paquete dejo de funcionar. Por suerte la nueva estructura conserva por lo menos la parte necesaria para hacer sus funciones. Se localizar el fallo y como arreglarlo, lo

Hi, Is there a function in R that lets one represent an integer in binary format for a given number of bits? So an example would be.... > binary.function(num=5, num.of.bits=8) > "00000101" Or, is this something I have to write myself? Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, Sam.

Hace unos meses os escribir para comunicaros que había un fallo en esta función. Como os prometí os comento la respuesta por si alguno está interesado en utilizar el paquete LMERconvenientsfucntions Dear Javier, The package has been updated and should work for you fine now. Note that function mcp.fnc does not return the fourth plot (dffits) anymore. We still have to figure out a way to compute

Javier, Creo que aquí aplica la ley de Linus que dice: "Dado un número suficientemente elevado de ojos, todos los errores se convierten en obvios". La persona que revisa y encuentra un error no necesariamente tiene que ser la misma que la que lo escribe. Una motivación muy importante al compartir un código es la de recibir los beneficios del control de calidad por parte de tus pares.

I am trying to view the source code of the function nlm in the stats package of R 2.4.1. I downloaded the source from CRAN and opened nlm.R, and it calls a .Internal function: .Internal(nlm(function(x) f(x, ...), p, hessian, typsize, fscale, msg, ndigit, gradtol, stepmax, steptol, iterlim)) This is the same thing I saw when entering the function name at the R command

I'm struggling to explain an ASAN report I'm now getting that I didn't get previously on the same code. In fact the report only happens with -O2 and not when I remove the -O flags which makes it hard to debug and makes me suspect it's dependent on exactly which instructions the code generation decides to access the bytes involved. Afaict the C code shouldn't be accessing the

Hi, first of all - I''m relatively unexpierienced with GUI programming in general and with FXRuby in particular. I''ve managed to write a little FXRuby app that animates some data I''ve collected. I made really good progress for a while, but now I''m stuck with the following problem. My data is read from file and can have a varying number of elements, depending on

Hi everyone. I have a problem that I have been unable to determine either the best way to proceed and why the methods I'm trying to use sometimes fail. I'm using the pf() function in an optimization function to find a noncentrality parameter that leads to a specific value at a specified quantile. My goal is to have a general function that returns the noncentrality parameter that

As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or

As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or

As said by Linus: A symmetric naming is only helpful if it implies symmetries in use. Otherwise it's actively misleading. In "kzalloc()", the z is meaningful and an important part of what the caller wants. In "kzfree()", the z is actively detrimental, because maybe in the future we really _might_ want to use that "memfill(0xdeadbeef)" or

Hello everyone, please I need your help. To reproduce my problem I created simple pass for backends (TestPass.cpp in attached files). That pass I call from Mips backend in this way (MipsTargetMachine.cpp): bool MipsPassConfig::addPreRegAlloc() { addPass(createTestPass()); return false; } The problem becomes, when I am trying compile file ldtoa.ll (in attached files). Compiling

v5: - Break the btrfs patch out as a separate patch to be processed independently. - Update the commit log of patch 1 to make it less scary. - Add a kzfree backward compatibility macro in patch 2. v4: - Break out the memzero_explicit() change as suggested by Dan Carpenter so that it can be backported to stable. - Drop the "crypto: Remove unnecessary